Posted on May 6, 2018
Supreme Court case could give public employees more freedom
1.57K
18
8
2
2
0
Supreme Court
Freedom
Justice
Elections
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
4
4
0
This is an interesting case. I think that people should not be forced to be in a union. A union should be voluntary.
(4)
(0)
2
2
0
OK,,, if an employee does not want to contribute to "fund government-union collective bargaining" then that employee should not reap the rewards of such bargaining.
(2)
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
Sgt Wayne Wood - Surprise! I agree. However, I also do not believe "organizations" are "people" (as SCOTUS ruled) and should not be allowed unfettered political donations.
(2)
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
Capt Gregory Prickett when the folks who VOTE on the passage of pay raises through taxes... and the recipients of those tax-derived funds are then forced to pay them back to the negotiators, and the negotiators then dump those monies into the campaign coffers if those they negotiated with...
Notice who’s missing from the loop? The taxpayers...
Good thing collusion in and of itself is not a crime
Notice who’s missing from the loop? The taxpayers...
Good thing collusion in and of itself is not a crime
(1)
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
MSG Stan Hutchison to some extent we agree... but if not through a convenient (and legal) construct, what protections are offered to corporate entities?
Why start businesses if they are vulnerable to unscrupulous lawyers and rapacious ‘plaintiffs’ playing the lawsuit lottery?
I think tort reform is in order...
Why start businesses if they are vulnerable to unscrupulous lawyers and rapacious ‘plaintiffs’ playing the lawsuit lottery?
I think tort reform is in order...
(0)
(0)
Sgt Wayne Wood
Capt Gregory Prickett wouldn’t that require an informed & intelligent electorate?
The same folks who get their news from Facebook & eat Tide packets? Those folks?
The same folks who get their news from Facebook & eat Tide packets? Those folks?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google