Posted on Mar 3, 2018
1
1
0
Imagine the Govt round up of guns with this nut in office
Trump says take guns first and worry about 'due process second' in White House gun meeting
Posted from usatoday.com
Donald Trump
Gun Control
Firearms and Guns
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 2
Clearly you need a new supply of tinfoil
“ASHINGTON — President Trump said Wednesday he favors taking guns away from people who might commit violence before going through legal due process in the courts,”
so you’d be OK with leaving three or four weapons in the hands of a man woman or child that has communicated a threat to someone else?
You’d be OK leaving weapons in the hands of a veteran who sold all of his possessions gave away other stop drop his dog off at animal control and wrote a suicide note we should just leave those weapons in his possession and worry about them after we go to court to get a psych eval
Sorry partner but you’re so blinded by hate you can read into anything he says and come up with a reason it’s wrong
People with the legal right to vote Eddie either grossly ignorant or blinded to reality because of their hate of a person are larger danger to America and American citizens then the current president is.
“ASHINGTON — President Trump said Wednesday he favors taking guns away from people who might commit violence before going through legal due process in the courts,”
so you’d be OK with leaving three or four weapons in the hands of a man woman or child that has communicated a threat to someone else?
You’d be OK leaving weapons in the hands of a veteran who sold all of his possessions gave away other stop drop his dog off at animal control and wrote a suicide note we should just leave those weapons in his possession and worry about them after we go to court to get a psych eval
Sorry partner but you’re so blinded by hate you can read into anything he says and come up with a reason it’s wrong
People with the legal right to vote Eddie either grossly ignorant or blinded to reality because of their hate of a person are larger danger to America and American citizens then the current president is.
(7)
(0)
SGT Jim Arnold
SGM Erik Marquez - What it really boils down to is there are plenty of laws on the books to fix this just the courts and LEO's to do their jobs
(1)
(0)
SGM Erik Marquez
SGT Jim Arnold - isn't that why the had involuntary commitment laws for threats of harm or injury?
Yes, that covers threats to self, and during that commitment, if warranted due process could take place and a court order sought to remove weapons from possession... But again, that is AFTER the action..
Yes, that covers threats to self, and during that commitment, if warranted due process could take place and a court order sought to remove weapons from possession... But again, that is AFTER the action..
(1)
(0)
PFC Michael Korach
Having dealt with involuntary commitment law's as a police officer their where many a time that hospitals would just release these people it was a joke and the 48-hour commitment would never happen, why once the doctor asked to do you want to hurt your self or others they would answer no. The written narrative we would send over did little to keep these people for observation if they didn't say it or presented themselves as a none threat they released them. it's not an LEO failing to do there job's its hospitals refusing to keep these people because the wards for them are full and they have no room. until being or acting crazy is a crime criminal courts have no reason to see these people most jails wont take misdemeanor arrests anymore. Probate court is not a choice law enforcement has it's not an avenue for them to take. The failure comes around because no one who can really address the issue has an actual legal way to do so there is no court system set up to deal with the number of mental health individuals walking around who should never have or own a firearm. to add to the problem wanting to kill your self alone is not illegal, and most of these people are looking to do that and take others with them. can a fix be found yes will it take some work yes could it infringe on peoples rights and then force them to prove they are not a danger? yes, it can.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
We now have definitive proof that he stopped reading the Bill of Rights at the 2nd Amendment, after skipping the 1st,
(1)
(0)
SPC Perry Gresham
Top, with all due respect. We dont have definitive proof of anything. I think some people wish so bad for President Trump to fuck up for the sole reason that their long time hate is justified.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google