Posted on Feb 17, 2018
Does Mueller Indictment Mean Clinton Campaign Can Be Indicted for Chris Steele?
1.45K
20
13
7
7
0
This should cause some consternation in the Czarina's circle of co-conspirators
Does Mueller Indictment Mean Clinton Campaign Can Be Indicted for Chris Steele?
Posted from lawandcrime.comPosted in these groups: 
Law
Law
Posted 7 y ago
Responses: 5
3
3
0
LTC Orlando Illi
Where are the indictments for the outrageous actions of the Clinton campaign!?!
If the same set of facts applied to the GOP, there would be non-stop 24 by 7 coverage and demands for perp walks daily. Oh wait, that is the normal at MSDNC.
It is always OK for the left, they always mean well, even when they break the law and abuse people's rights.
I almost did not vote this election, I was overseas and still have no idea if my vote was actually included. Trump was my last choice, but when your other option is Hilliary, Trump became the only choice. I really became hardened when Susan Rice, Hillary and Obama just lied to military families in their face and went public with total BS on Libya. Everything after that made my distrust of the Obama / Clinton administration and the DNC grow after seeing them lie again and again about Benghazi. If you keep getting away with lies and the MSM covers for you, why not push for more.
The sad part is that our government will likely not hold the Clinton's or the DNC accountable.
The corporate shill media of the DNC will ignore and gloss it over, but these tactics if allowed now and not punished then paid for opposition research floated to third parties and reinforced by paid operatives in other countries will become the come way of doing business in the future.
I hope the Clinton's and the Democrats like the future they have created, the lack of personal and now professional ethics is the undoing of America.
Capt Gregory Prickett
Where are the indictments for the outrageous actions of the Clinton campaign!?!
If the same set of facts applied to the GOP, there would be non-stop 24 by 7 coverage and demands for perp walks daily. Oh wait, that is the normal at MSDNC.
It is always OK for the left, they always mean well, even when they break the law and abuse people's rights.
I almost did not vote this election, I was overseas and still have no idea if my vote was actually included. Trump was my last choice, but when your other option is Hilliary, Trump became the only choice. I really became hardened when Susan Rice, Hillary and Obama just lied to military families in their face and went public with total BS on Libya. Everything after that made my distrust of the Obama / Clinton administration and the DNC grow after seeing them lie again and again about Benghazi. If you keep getting away with lies and the MSM covers for you, why not push for more.
The sad part is that our government will likely not hold the Clinton's or the DNC accountable.
The corporate shill media of the DNC will ignore and gloss it over, but these tactics if allowed now and not punished then paid for opposition research floated to third parties and reinforced by paid operatives in other countries will become the come way of doing business in the future.
I hope the Clinton's and the Democrats like the future they have created, the lack of personal and now professional ethics is the undoing of America.
Capt Gregory Prickett
(3)
(0)
LTC John Shaw
LTC Orlando Illi - She is not done, the MSM will keep propping her up until she and the DNC are elected something.
(0)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
The accountability also lies with the current administration and Congress. It has been SOP for both sides of the political spectrum to let bygones be bygones, until this humiliating loss by Hillary and her supporters. Guarantee if Pelosi and Schumer become majority leaders, they will remain on the attack, unlike the Republicans.
(1)
(0)
2
2
0
Only if you don't understand why paying for opposition research from a private individual is legal and coordinating with a foreign government that is giving you dirt on a opponent isn't.
(2)
(0)
2
2
0
Logically it should, but I'm not holding my breath. To be honest with you, though, I think these indictments aren't really a serious thing. Indicting people who Mueller has no chance or prosecuting is kinda like saying, "Oh yeah? Come here and I'll teach you a lesson!" to the bully, five minutes after the bully drives away. They serve a purpose for Mueller, though, because it sends a message, "Hey, I'm doing something*."
The indictments also serve their purpose in the media, because people can put on their serious face and put the serious tone in their voice. The reality is a lot of indictments do not end in successful prosecutions. These indictments will stand indefinitely as long as there are not opposing lawyers, but how long would they stand if there was competent legal counsel opposing them? At a minimum, the opposing side would be able to get its side of the story out to the public. As it is, there are just a few people analyzing the indictments and fewer still expressing some cynicism about them.
*Seriously? Indicting foreigners for not registering as foreign agents? For buying Facebook ads?"
The indictments also serve their purpose in the media, because people can put on their serious face and put the serious tone in their voice. The reality is a lot of indictments do not end in successful prosecutions. These indictments will stand indefinitely as long as there are not opposing lawyers, but how long would they stand if there was competent legal counsel opposing them? At a minimum, the opposing side would be able to get its side of the story out to the public. As it is, there are just a few people analyzing the indictments and fewer still expressing some cynicism about them.
*Seriously? Indicting foreigners for not registering as foreign agents? For buying Facebook ads?"
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google