Responses: 4
People are getting tired of the "Russian investigation" which is total BS and bias. They should also be investigate Hillary and her people for their roll in rigging the Democrat nomination, campaign contributions, Uranium One, and all the kick backs she got while Secretary of State.
(6)
(0)
Today, with the release of this memo that has the dems and the FBI's knickers in a swivet we MAY, I emphasize, MAY have better insight into what was going on at the FBI, DOJ and within the Obama administration around FISA warrants and eavesdropping.
I don't think we will like what we hear about how some of these powers were arrayed, used and leveraged against Americans.
I don't think we will like what we hear about how some of these powers were arrayed, used and leveraged against Americans.
(2)
(0)
Susan Foster
You will see an R-spun memo, and unless it happened last night or this morning, their own R committee members didn't even get to read the base document. It will make a loose connection to Hillary, even though she didn't commission the dossier. They will allege that there wasn't corroboration, yet there will be no proof. You won't see the memo the D's wrote on their spin. What you really won't get is anything definitive. The ones who believe him will continue to. The ones who didn't vote for him won't. I don't think it's going to clear up a thing. And I say this as an I.
(0)
(0)
Cpl Jeff N.
It is not even disputed that her campaign paid Steele for the dossier. You need to catch up. They big question is how was it used by the FBI, DOJ and Obama admin. It appears, based upon this document that the dossier was the primary document used for the FISA warrants and the dossier was known by the FBI and others that the dossier was a paid for political document.
Let this sink in for a second Susan. You have a democrat administration with political appointees at DOJ and FBI using known false documents to get an improper warrant to eavesdrop on their political opponent. The dossier, know to be false, was used 3 times to gain a FISA warrant. It also sound like the FISA judge was not told of the origins and nature of the dossier. It was presented as an intelligence document not a political opposition research hit job. BTW, the dossier is still uncorroborated. There is no proof any of it is true to this day.
You should be very concerned about this but you seem very dismissive of the government using the intelligence apparatus, law enforcement and the FISA courts of this country against political opponents.
Let this sink in for a second Susan. You have a democrat administration with political appointees at DOJ and FBI using known false documents to get an improper warrant to eavesdrop on their political opponent. The dossier, know to be false, was used 3 times to gain a FISA warrant. It also sound like the FISA judge was not told of the origins and nature of the dossier. It was presented as an intelligence document not a political opposition research hit job. BTW, the dossier is still uncorroborated. There is no proof any of it is true to this day.
You should be very concerned about this but you seem very dismissive of the government using the intelligence apparatus, law enforcement and the FISA courts of this country against political opponents.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next