Avatar feed
Responses: 24
SFC Jim Ruether
14
14
0
On July 30, 2013, Judge Lind issued her findings regarding the charges. Bradley Manning was acquitted of aiding the enemy by knowingly giving out intelligence through indirect means, and was convicted of 19 of the 21 or 22 specified charges, including theft and six counts of espionage. Is this the kind of person we want in the Senate. I don't live in Connecticut but if I did I would launch my own campaign to defeat him/her/it You can put lipstick on a traitor but he's still a traitor. Bradley/Chelsea Manning is still a traitor.
(14)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Nondestructive Inspection (NDI)
MSgt (Join to see)
7 y
But the military is NOT a democracy. When we join we agree to give up some of our rights while serving. She obviously doesn’t understand service before self. She should have gotten out then written a book.
(5)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
7 y
SSG Diane R. - I do not remember the specific number of documents Manning released. I believe it was in the 100's of thousands. Do you believe there was a qualitative analysis done by Manning. Did he (at the time, he) make any effort to ensure what was released was for some greater good, or was he an unhappy soldier, lashing out; with no concern or regard for the price that others might pay for his temper tantrum.

Of the two houses, the Senate is supposed to be the slower more deliberative body.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SSG(P) Supply Sergeant (S4)
SSG(P) (Join to see)
7 y
I say to myself sometimes, "If I was at Kent State, would I have fired?". May each of us never have to be given that order and look ourselves in the mirror, knowing we did the wrong thing. I don't know if Manning did the right thing or not. I guess we will have to wait another decade for hindsight to decide.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Diane R.
SSG Diane R.
7 y
Good points, Michelle.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SN Greg Wright
14
14
0
Why on earth would you wish him luck, knowing his history? As usual (and this isn't aimed at you SSgt), extremist liberals think he's entitled to the position simply because he's trans.
(14)
Comment
(0)
SSgt Christopher Brose
SSgt Christopher Brose
7 y
SFC Jim Ruether - A paradigm is a worldview, a way of understanding things, a set of commonly understood rules, something like that.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Maj John Bell
Maj John Bell
7 y
E655a0e4
SFC Jim Ruether - It's all in the pronunciation "pair of dig ems."
(3)
Reply
(0)
1SG Infantryman
1SG (Join to see)
7 y
Maj John Bell - Hey those will make a very comfortable dirt nap for some traitors
(2)
Reply
(0)
1SG Infantryman
1SG (Join to see)
7 y
Him. Exactly
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC George Smith
10
10
0
Considering that without the Pardon from BHO, He/she would still be in Prison... I don't think we need any More Career Criminal Politicians in DC ... we cant get rid of the ones there... and the last thing we need is a convicted Criminal in congress ... especially one who can't be trusted with Classified materials...
(10)
Comment
(0)
SSG Diane R.
SSG Diane R.
7 y
Manning was NOT pardoned.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
7 y
SSG Diane R. - Actually in this case it is a moot technicality. Most individuals that support this farce believe that the commutation (which is a form of clemency, just as a pardon is a form of it) is the same as an exonaration which actually equates quite well with what a pardon actually is compared to the commutation that was actually given. So to those individuals - Commutation equals (=) Exonarations equals (=) Pardon. It is as simple as that.
(4)
Reply
(0)
CPO Glenn Moss
CPO Glenn Moss
7 y
SSG Robert Webster - When it comes to the law, is't NOT a moot technicality and it DOES matter, regardless of what other people believe.

His sentence was commuted. He was not pardoned. If John Q. Public can't take the time to figure out the difference, then that is a separate problem indicative of the relative willful ignorance of such people.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Robert Webster
SSG Robert Webster
7 y
CPO Glenn Moss - It is a moot technicality since it does not keep that individual from running or actually holding public office at the federal level. And considering that if this individual were to be elected that the only thing that could keep them from taking that office would be Congress (whom has let other convicted criminals take their office), which if past actions are any indicator would not be a bar. So it is a moot point. It is also a moot point to most of the 'uninformed' citizenry, since they do not know the difference in the types of clemency as I stated. The saddest part of that misunderstanding - they do not know the difference between exoneration and clemency.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close