Avatar feed
Responses: 6
Col Joseph Lenertz
6
6
0
Russia and Canada would be pleased if global warming would kindly speed up.
(6)
Comment
(0)
SSG Edward Tilton
SSG Edward Tilton
7 y
Not really both are experiencing melting in their permafrost. Much of Siberia may sink. whole areas are getting undermined
(1)
Reply
(0)
Col Joseph Lenertz
Col Joseph Lenertz
7 y
SSG Edward Tilton - Well, my attempt at humor failed. I guess everything sucks everywhere.
(3)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Operations Intelligence
2
2
0
Funny how these people scream about global warming and the damage we are doing to the environment, yet they live in large homes sucking up energy, use private jets that burn fuel and drive expensive gas guzzling vehicles. And they want everyone else to reduce carbon emissions. Hypocrites at their finest!
(2)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Operations Intelligence
MSgt (Join to see)
7 y
SSG Jessica Bautista - Just for starters...Hillary, Gore, Obama, .......
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Jessica Bautista
SSG Jessica Bautista
7 y
What do they drive? How big are their houses? Do they recycle??
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSgt Operations Intelligence
MSgt (Join to see)
7 y
SSG Jessica Bautista - Seriously? Typical Liberal response by asking more and more questions without accepting or researching the facts. If you really want to know try Google!
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG Jessica Bautista
SSG Jessica Bautista
7 y
I was being facetious.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPO Hospital Corpsman
2
2
0
7e80a6a1
There is a difference between weather and climate.
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
(2)
Comment
(0)
LTC David Brown
LTC David Brown
7 y
LTC David Brown - at least Al Gore’s ocean front mansion will be safe!
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPO Hospital Corpsman
CPO (Join to see)
7 y
LTC David Brown - Sir, you apparently misinterpreted your article with personally held preconceived notions that are not included in the actual text of the article. Again, there is a difference between weather and climate. You mention dropping sea levels as a counter argument to long term climate change, but the article affirms that the 2010/2011 La Nina weather cycle was a one off event and confirms both climate change and rising sea levels. How does this article support any your claims? It is also my understanding that weather will likely be more extreme; not milder.

As mentioned in your article:
"According to a U.S. study, the effect caused by the La Niña weather pattern around Australia meant global sea levels fell for 18 months during 2010 and 2011, bucking the long-term trend of rising sea levels caused by higher temperatures and melting ice sheets."

"The scientists said that as the atmospheric patterns have returned to normal, more rain is falling over the tropical oceans once more and the seas are rising again."

"Dr John Fasullo, a scientist at the National Centre for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in the U.S. said: 'It's a beautiful illustration of how complicated our climate system is.'"
(1)
Reply
(0)
LTC David Brown
LTC David Brown
7 y
I didn’t misinterpret the article.. I am just pointing out how when nature doesn’t follow the models it is one off , data gets fudged or BS abounds. If there is a warming hiatus take ship intake temps ( which are contaminated) and add them to satellite and ocean buoy temps and hiatus is gone. Even Dr Judith Curry can’t stand the BS any more. Dr Ivar Giaever Nobel prize in physics resigned from the American Physical Society because you can’t discuss global warming. Is this really science? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivar_Giaever
(0)
Reply
(0)
LTC David Brown
LTC David Brown
7 y
Then there is this that explains why some of the suppositions may be wrong. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SBjFjSZjv6w
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close