FOX's file: | PunditFact

Should I cite Inforwars or perhaps Breitbart. Would that make you feel happy and warm inside?

Cpl Tou Lee Yang - Perhaps you could cite a source that isn't known to be significantly biased. It's a very weak argument to say Fox is not credible when citing from a leftist website.

MAJ (Join to see) - A guy calling Politifact a joke, the same person who supports a liar in chief, a liar who lies about his own lies to cover up his lying? Tell me it's not true! Jaren, Politifact is more neutral than Breitbart, Inforwars, and Fox News. So I understand when a source known to be unbiased does not conform to your agenda, it must and it has to be fake.

Cpl Tou Lee Yang - Are you so hypocritical that you can't see the irony in accusing someone of discrediting news media because of their political affiliation in a post where you attempt to discredit fox because of their bias???

Thank you for that completely inaccurate portrait of my political views. Politifact is a biased source, they attempt to be more neutral than most of the other sources, yes that is very clearly evident, never did I say they were fake, just biased.

But I'll never sit and listen to a Democrat accuse the Republicans of lying, cover-ups, and corruption, not that the accusations are not true, but when the primary candidate was a Clinton you have no moral position whatsoever to accuse another candidate of lying and corruption. Hillary has lied before testimony how many times, her husband was impeached while the president for lying to congress, how many women have accused Hillary of predatory and name smearing campaigns against Bill's victims?
Uncover real facts on Trump and I'll join your cause, but so far the evidence against Trump is based on fiction, funded by the Clintons.