Avatar feed
Responses: 6
SSG Michael Hartsfield
5
5
0
Look. Did Bergdahl abandon his post? Yes. Did he misbehave in front of the enemy? Yes. Would a military court-martial come to that conclusion on its own? More than likely, yes. So Trump didn't have to say anything but because he chose to do so, or what many old school military members would call "provided undue command influence", Bergdahl may skate because of it.
(5)
Comment
(0)
MSgt Daryl Seward
MSgt Daryl Seward
7 y
He was NOT Commander in Chief at the time of the comments. Bergdahl is traitor who plead guilty... Sentence him appropriately and appropriately does not give credit for a 5 year vacation with our enemies!
(1)
Reply
(0)
SSG Environmental Specialist
SSG (Join to see)
7 y
This is not a jury trial, where public opinion can sway what possible jurors may or may not think. This is a military trial, and why would he dismiss said case since he has entered a plea. Some one from JAG clarify please.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
SFC Kelly Fuerhoff
7 y
MSgt Daryl Seward - But he was asked about Bergdahl again in the last week and he said "I stand by my comments that he's a traitor." So he DID say it WHILE President.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT James Murphy
SGT James Murphy
4 y
I'm with you SSG!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Phyllis Maynard
3
3
0
You know what sometimes public opinion can talk too much. Witnesses to 911 mysteriously died, White Water witnesses mysteriously died, Kennedy assassination witnesses mysteriously died. We are in the age of cyber spying extends to anyone talking crap about the government that includes me. Sometimes it is better to stop talking while you are ahead (that is, not dead).
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
2
2
0
Sounds like possible fake news to me.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close