Avatar feed
Responses: 5
CPT Jack Durish
9
9
0
Edited 7 y ago
Attacks on the 2nd Amendment and all the rest are the result of poor citizenship. We have replaced education with indoctrination in our schools, and the "citizens" they produce spring forth ready to support and vote for candidates of a certain ideology. As we old farts are dying off, they are becoming the dominate voting block. All of these issues can be traced to the simple fact that most of us who watch this with trepidation, never particularly cared about politics and government. We were raised in a time when government was hardly a blip on our radar. We laughed at political campaign shenanigans like we did when fellow students vied for the social distinction of being class president. We lived our lives with little regard for government. We didn't ask much of it and didn't care about it until they began taxing us too much and devaluing our money by spending more than they took in. Can we turn it around? I don't know...
(9)
Comment
(0)
SFC Wade W.
SFC Wade W.
7 y
MSgt Steve Sweeney - There is no "right" to operate an automobile. There is a God Given Right, as that is what the Bill of Rights affirms, to keep and bear arms. That is the flaw I see in your plan for gun control. Sorry, this patriot will never register nor allow any agency anywhere to attempt to control my rights. These are not rights granted by the government but are rights that the government is supposed to protect for every citizen of our nation. I would encourage you to take a few courses or at least read some of their papers at Hillsdale College. A very excellent clarification of our Constitution and Bill of Rights and the role of our Federal Government can be found there.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
7 y
MSgt Steve Sweeney - There's definitely a problem but I don't think it's as big as the media makes it out to be. The number of gun deaths in the U.S. is minuscule when compared to deaths from other causes. I really think the downside of having a national firearms registry far outweighs any good that would come of it. The kind of registration you are talking about just makes confiscation much easier for the government to accomplish.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
7 y
MSgt Steve Sweeney - No, my approach is based on the reality of what has actually happened throughout history when some tyrant decided they could more easily control an unarmed populace. Many in our government would like nothing better than to confiscate all privately owned firearms. And if the police and/or military are ordered to confiscate firearms, they will obey the order because that's what they've been trained to do. Most service members, just like most civilians in our society, don't have a clue about what our Constitution says, don't care, or aren't going to risk loss of a job or prison for disobeying an order. To believe otherwise is just not realistic.

I didn't join our armed forces to support our government. I joined to support and defend our Constitution. Remember that oath you took?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
7 y
MSgt Steve Sweeney - If it's fear, as long as it's rational fear, I don't see a problem. We have an entire insurance industry based on such rational fear.

The difference between swearing an oath to the Constitution versus government is that if those in power in our government step too far over the line in violating our Constitution to the point of tyranny, you and I didn't swear an oath to support and defend them or their government.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Psychological Operations Officer
2
2
0
489637f9
Here's a graph of violent crime in the US (from National Review). The peak was around 1992-3, then a significant downward turn happened, especially steep from around 1994-2004. Oh yeah, that happens to correspond to the years the assault rifle ban was in effect. So if you want to throw around a correlation between violent crime and access to weapons, this chart would show that the turnaround in violent crime directly correlated with the assault rifle ban. And as you said, things seemed to be fine for the last few decades. That includes the decade that assault rifles were banned. So clearly banning assault rifles didn't lead to any increase in violent crime. In fact, it correlates with turning around a decades long rise in crime.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Chris Wagoner
SGT Chris Wagoner
7 y
LTC (Join to see) - Really? Please show me where I said any correlation was... "we have seen a reduction in all types of violent crime. Why is that? I am sure there are many reasons. " SOunds to me like plain English. Then again I could be wrong.
(0)
Reply
(0)
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
7 y
Any chance Mike Durish could be allowed to comment? Apparently he is blocked? Sandy
SPC Les Darbison
SPC Les Darbison
7 y
Assult rifle ban? ( A made up Democrat term when applied to AR15s and AR 10s) First of all assault rifles have select fire full auto, Simi auto. Second of all long guns including AR 10s and AR 15s are the smallest % of firearms shootings and always have been. Check your facts. It has been decades seen the citizens could own a full AUTO firearm without a class 3 license. It is illegal to convert any weapon to full auto. Is there any state in the union that doesn't require a Background check before buying a firearm. Maybe Alaska? And if your a veteran per some Democrat elected officials your to angery or too patriotic to own or be trusted a FIREARM.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SPC Les Darbison
SPC Les Darbison
7 y
One more thing that effects the above chart it was affected by a HUGE firearms ownership Upswing and some states relaxing firearm regulations! Make some states open carry and other states also relaxed Concealed carry laws. When the law abiding citizen is armed crime stats consistently go down!
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Stan Hutchison
2
2
0
This article repeats the same old line,,, if guns are not available, cars or such will be used to kill,, and Chicago. He needs to get some new rallying cries.

I do not support the taking away of our firearms. But, I do support stronger background checks, including mental health issues, and the limitation on certain types of firearms, including any modification to make the weapon fully automatic.
Would these steps have stopped the Vegas shooting? Who knows. But they may stop the next one.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
7 y
MSG Stan Hutchison SSG (Join to see) There already are severe restrictions under federal law on fully automatic weapons and modifications that allow a weapon to fire fully automatic. I know because I just went through the same process to purchase a short-barrel rifle and it took 13 months for ATF to sign off on the transfer. During those 13 months, the rifle that I already paid a lot of money for sat in my gun dealer's safe. Do you think having to wait 13 months to take possession of something you have purchased is reasonable?
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
Cpl Mark McMiller - No, 13 months does not seem reasonable. However, I see no justification in any civilian possessing any form of automatic weapon.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Mark McMiller
Cpl Mark McMiller
7 y
MSG Stan Hutchison - Fortunately for us, under our Constitution, a citizen does not have a burden to justify owning anything. Under our Constitution it is the government that has the burden of justifying banning something.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MSG Stan Hutchison
MSG Stan Hutchison
7 y
Banning automatics is simply a matter of public safety.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close