Avatar feed
Responses: 25
SGT Tony Clifford
42
42
0
This owner has the right to ban whomever he wants from patronizing his business. Financially speaking it doesn't seem wise to limit your clientele, but in a free country he should be allowed that freedom. Is he an asshole? Yes. Is it his right to be one? Yes.
(42)
Comment
(0)
SGT Charles Ludwigsen
SGT Charles Ludwigsen
>1 y
SGT Clifford, I agree that he 'should' be able to ban whomever he chooses and face the financial repercussions. However, according to the judicial climate of the last several years he cannot. Don't want to bake a cake for someone? Lose your business in fines. Don't want to perform a ceremony or rent out your event space? Face discrimination charges. Actually, I guess you are right SGT. As a veteran and an active LEO, I am aware that our choice of service comes with no protection against discrimination by the population we protect. The baker, event coordinator, restaurant owner, or whatever should have the right to make dumb business choices and face the consequences. But the courts are saying otherwise... in select cases.
(4)
Reply
(0)
SGT Tony Clifford
SGT Tony Clifford
>1 y
You're right about the double standard. My position is coming from the standpoint of classical liberalism which places the rights of the individual in highest esteem. That includes property rights and economic freedom. I see both situations as a limitation on freedom and also a violation of a person's right to free association. In personally not happy with a government telling anyone they have to sell a good or service. I truly feel that ultimately in a free marketplace people who choose to discriminate will be placing themselves at an economic disadvantage. If I were the business man I would make my business available to any patron. A cops money spends just as well as anybody else's. On a moral level discrimination against people based on circumstances of birth are wrong, that includes but not limited to race, gender, sexual orientation and national origin. Other types of discrimination while not necessarily immoral on its face depend on the reasoning. Discrimination based on ability isn't wrong and makes perfect sense in many instances. For example, someone who can't read shouldn't be in a position that has a read prerequisite.
(2)
Reply
(0)
CPT Patrick Dougherty
CPT Patrick Dougherty
5 y
If there is ever a “problem”, I hope the response is very slow!
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
1px xxx
Suspended Profile
I love the response from the Atlanta Police Department saying they will still respond in emergency situations. Really shows who the adults are in this situation.
1SG Criminal Investigator
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
They only have to if there is an explicit duty to act within that jurisdiction. This does not exist everywhere.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Scott Shuttleworth
6
6
0
He will be the first to cry when someone robs his place or someone gets in toruble there and he needs assistance. I would probably get lost on the way there and eventually find it...you know, don't want to cause further traffic problems by rushing in and out of traffic. Once there I would say I can't come in, you won't allow me in the building so when you throw whoever out I will take it from there but you don't want us, we will wait right here.
(6)
Comment
(0)
LT Ed Skiba
LT Ed Skiba
>1 y
Just puts the cops down on his level Colonel. At least they take their responsibilities seriously
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close