4
4
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 9
The signers of Declaration of Independence were heavily influenced by the thinkers/philosophers of yesterday. After the failed Confederacy, the US Constitution and Bill of Rights declared the Natural Rights, by some, or God given rights, to others were immutable by any power on earth, person or government. Thus any person violating the Natural, or God given rights of the individual would feel justice at the hands of society. greg is no Locke, Marx maybe, but he doesn't speak for me.
“The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule”
“The natural liberty of man consists in not recognizing any sovereign power on earth, and not be subject to the will or legislative authority to anyone”
John Locke, The Second Treatise of Government
“The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule”
“The natural liberty of man consists in not recognizing any sovereign power on earth, and not be subject to the will or legislative authority to anyone”
John Locke, The Second Treatise of Government
(3)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
To be fair, Capt Gregory Prickett has never evinced that he is a Marxist. A bit over obsessed with religion, but no communist, not by any means. Beyond that, I find no fault with your comment.
(1)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
CPT Jack Durish Considering his stance on religion, he follows a Marxist doctrine fairly closely. Anyone espousing any religious dogma will be attacked by him. His first instinct is to attack anyone that doesn't think like him, I'm sick of his BS.
"Marxists stand on the basis of philosophical materialism, which rules out the existence of any supernatural entity, or anything outside or "above" nature. There is, in fact, no need for any such explanation for life and the universe - least of all today. Nature furnishes its own explanations and it furnishes them in great abundance."
http://www.marxist.com/marxism-religion-liberation-theology220701.htm
"Marxists stand on the basis of philosophical materialism, which rules out the existence of any supernatural entity, or anything outside or "above" nature. There is, in fact, no need for any such explanation for life and the universe - least of all today. Nature furnishes its own explanations and it furnishes them in great abundance."
http://www.marxist.com/marxism-religion-liberation-theology220701.htm
The attitude of Marxists to religion, relating not only to Marxism and Christianity, but also to Islam
(0)
(0)
For anyone coming late to this discussion, you will find contradictory arguments posted by Capt Gregory Prickett as well as my responses. Basically, he avoids the fundamental issue while chipping away at the edges of the presentation and my responses. You can read them for yourself. I merely want to add that it is clear from the historical evidence (writings of the Founders and others who followed) that the Declaration of Independence and Constitution reflect strong influences of Judeo-Christian morality thereby pinning the hopes of the new nation clearly on the ability of people to govern themselves, a necessary quality for them to be given individual liberties. In other words, if people cannot govern themselves and their passions, they cannot be trusted with freedom and require a paternal government to dictate their every choice and action. Capt Pickett and many others argue that the Bible/Judeo-Christian morality (and thus the Constitution) are flawed because they are used to justify slavery. However, you'll note, if you study them carefully, that none of these documents justify slavery, they merely acknowledge their existence. Slavery was a cultural issue, as were others such as women's suffrage, that had to be resolved by We the People, often through conflict, sometimes violent. However, there is no moral excuse for slavery or subjugating women in these documents. Indeed, the only thing required to legally end slavery in the US was to interpret "men" as "humankind" including both men and women, black, white and whatever race. Those were cultural decisions. Other cultural challenges remain and these two may be resolved without destroying the fundamental blueprint of a limited government as described in the Constitution. Indeed, the cancerous growth of government beyond constitutional limits, is often the enemy of those attempting to correct cultural issues in the nation.
(2)
(0)
Cpl (Join to see)
He blocked me long ago because he refused to let anyone else's opinion be subjected to individual interpretation. He is just another indoctrinated cultural Marxist who would propagandize his revision further every time he speaks. I just wish he would be openly honest with his values, they definitely aren't in line with conservatism.
(2)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Capt Gregory Prickett - You seriously need to go back and reread my posting if you are interested in understanding correctly what I wrote. I never stated what your position was. I clearly stated that slavery was not sanctioned in either the Bible or the Constitution. I did not imply, infer, or state that you believed that. Now go take a stiff shot of demon rum and relax. You've gotten yourself all worked up over nothing and I'm beginning to worry about you.
(0)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
Capt Gregory Prickett - Sorry. Your nonsensical interpretations have become boring. No response necessary. Have a good evening.
(0)
(0)
Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens."
~ Washington's Farewell Address
~ Washington's Farewell Address
(2)
(0)
Read This Next