Posted on Jun 22, 2017
The 2016 Election and the Demise of Journalistic Standards
998
14
9
3
3
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 4
There was a time when you needed three independent sources to print a controversial story, now major newspapers will happily print rumors and opinion as fact. This is not the fault of "bad reporters" because it would not and could not happen if the editors did not allow it. I recently read (and independently verified) that the Washington Post had printed 128 retractions in a two week period. "Journalism" as we once knew it is all but dead. It has been replaced by its much more profitable cousin "Public Relations". The majority of news outlets" have become completely subsumed by major corporations and are only being kept open for their public relations value. The days of news outlets being ran as a public service are long over. If the owners and editors did not want poor journalism, we would not have it. The real question is why have the standards been allowed to fall so low?
(2)
(0)
Can Journalism be fixed? Seems a bit like drug addiction, first you have to admit and recognize the problem.. The smug jerks pouty faced over Ossoff's loss demonstrate we have a long way to go! Those journalists are still in denial!
(2)
(0)
Captain Jack - I just posted the same article (was on vacation last half of June and went off the grid, so I didn't see yours.) Will cross-post back to your link from mine....
BTW - it is nice to see others here that read the Imprimis!
BTW - it is nice to see others here that read the Imprimis!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next