0
0
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 1
Trump had thousands at his rallies while Hillary had hundreds and they are still making excuses why she lost. Lol to damn funny.
(3)
(0)
SFC Chad Sowash
Just to back up SPC Steve Bright - comment - It's not just his opinion. http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx
(1)
(0)
SPC Steve Bright
The ability of a present shouldn't be measured based on his ability to intimidate the director of the FBI but how he makes the US better. So far he has introduced or supported legislation that will have, in some cases already has, damage the US long term. Militarily and diplomatically he is also a disaster.
Dont get me wrong, Clinton was bad. We need better options but until the two parties stop backing big business interests, I doubt it will happen.
Dont get me wrong, Clinton was bad. We need better options but until the two parties stop backing big business interests, I doubt it will happen.
(1)
(0)
SPC Steve Bright
Sad part is both parties are putting up terrible options and pandering to big business
(0)
(0)
PO3 Steven Sherrill
SPC Steve Bright - The party system. We no longer have a two party system. Left wing, right wing, same rotting carcass. The typical rhetoric has been lesser of two evils. Lesser of two evils is still evil. This last election they didn't even try. There was no effort to find a less bad candidate. Trump came across as a megalomaniacal bigot, and Clinton as a dishonest symbol of a broken system. It is a broken system. My personal thought is that we should do away with any pre election day voting. No primaries, no caucuses. No cutting down party candidates to right wing left wing. We should have had nearly 30 candidates on our presidential ballots last year. That would have given a far better representing of America. I am not saying it would have changed the final outcome of the election, but it would have meant that instead of campaigning against the other candidate, the candidates would have instead needed to focus on why they are worthy of being voted for. Attack adds would be limited by the number of candidates. After all attacking candidate A is fine, but that still leaves B through CC that may be a better candidate than the producer of the add. Electoral college could still be used, but the number of votes needed to win election would be a fluid number from cycle to cycle based on the number of candidates in the race.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next