Avatar feed
Responses: 4
1SG Bn Ssa
2
2
0
But it doesn't apply to politicians.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Owner
1
1
0
Maybe the bill should include something about taking the children away from the parents and having them raised in the foster system. Break the cycle.
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO3 Business Advisement
PO3 (Join to see)
>1 y
The article at the bottom.
Franson says the punishment will be harsh, including potential loss of parental custody.
I'm thinking the children should be taken by default.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ James Woods
1
1
0
It's supposedly already a federal crime according to one of the cover stories of the incident referenced in this article. I'm surprised that current laws only apply to the medical personnel and clinic that performs the treatment but not the parents or guardians.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SGT Edward Wilcox
SGT Edward Wilcox
>1 y
It's supposed to be a religious practice(it isn't). The lawmakers went after the medical people because they didn't want to be seen as infringing on anyone's religious freedoms. The logic being that it was still legal to want it done but illegal to perform the procedure. We see how well that worked out.
(0)
Reply
(0)
MAJ James Woods
MAJ James Woods
>1 y
SGT Edward Wilcox - I understand why it's illegal. I'm just surprised the law didn't already hold adults accountable for abuse against a minor; that we need a specific law to make that distinction. Polygamy is considered one's religious freedom; that hasn't stopped lawmakers from infringing on that. Keep in mind, I'm not advocating polygamy, just using it as an example.
(1)
Reply
(0)
SGT Edward Wilcox
SGT Edward Wilcox
>1 y
MAJ James Woods - I agree. Just trying to explain why I thought they went after the providers first. Personally, any parent who would allow, much less advocate, such a thing to their own children has no business raising children.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close