Posted on Oct 28, 2016
New Emails in Clinton Case Came From Devices Once Used by Anthony Weiner
3.09K
36
20
5
5
0
It's hard not to question what did the FBI find in another technology device to reopen the case. Remember this is 11 days before the POTUS election. Does the lack of protection for confidential documents sent to the Secretary of State provide any doubt of competency? Not knowing what the "C" signifies in classified documents? After being the first lady for state. and country, Senator, Presidential candidate for 8 years and Secretary of State.
New Emails in Clinton Case Came From Devices Once Used by Anthony Weiner
Posted from nytimes.com
Office of the President (POTUS)
Election 2016
Elections
Integrity
Honor
Edited 8 y ago
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 6
7
7
0
There are people who are voting for Hillary in spite of her criminal negligence in the handling of the nation's secrets. Some don't believe it's true. Some don't care if it's true or not. One can only hope that they are in a minority. Trump is no winner, but Hillary is absolutely a loser.
(7)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
So many of these people SHOULD KNOW better. I totally agree. And as far as Trump goes, he certainly is not a winner. I believe my cat is a better candidate than Hillary. My kitty certainly is a lot more intelligent and HONEST.
(1)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
TSgt Frank Shirley - We already have a way of vetting candidates. It's called a campaign. Much like a military campaign, voters need to collect intelligence and make rational decisions. Once upon a time they had journalists helping them in this process. Sadly, journalists now work for the Left. They're propagandists spinning facts or hiding them to favor one candidate over the other. Thus, voters must work harder to find sources of intelligence that they can trust and verity.
(5)
(0)
CPT Jack Durish
PVT James Strait - Gave up on perfection long ago. However, I cannot, will not tolerate criminality. Hillary is a criminal. The FBI Director laid out a prima facie case earlier but chose not to recommend indictment (most likely for political reasons) and it blew up in his face (as it should have). New evidence has given him an excuse/opportunity to redeem himself and he's taking political heat for it. That is the long and short of it. However, you are correct. The interconnectivity of the Cybersphere has given us the opportunity to participate in the process like never before. Witnesses and experts can congregate in flash mobs around every issue. It's fascinating to watch and exciting to participate. It may just signal a new birth of democratic participation in political processes.
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
I read some of these WikiLeaked emails. There was only one that had (C). The rest were (S) or (TS). Most had release instructions such as (S/REL GB, etc.). That whole (C) thing was a way to excuse themselves by claiming the alphabet markers of paragraphs, and the media ran with it to confuse the public. Most of the emails I read looked just like they always look to any of us that have ever used SIPRNET or JWICS to transmit anything.
(3)
(0)
2
2
0
Depending on the classification level of the material in question, we may never know specifically what caused the red flag.
(2)
(0)
(0)
(1)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
MCPO Roger Collins - Are you pretending to know what the e-mails were about, who sent them, who read them and whether they contained classified. ? If so please seek professional help.
(0)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
PO2 William Allen Crowder - There has been a couple of those types pop up, never understood why privileges are given to Post if we can't be sure it's a fellow vet.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google