Posted on Oct 21, 2016
Clinton's Debate Reference To Nuclear Response Rekindles Judgment Questions
3.22K
25
24
6
6
0
Why isn't this a BIG deal?
"Intelligence experts, including the former Navy SEAL and a former senior intelligence official told Fox News that the mere fact the response time has been reported in academic documents does not authorize government officials who hold a security clearance, or had previous access to classified information, to discuss it publicly."
She seems to be getting pass after pass, I just don't get it.
"Intelligence experts, including the former Navy SEAL and a former senior intelligence official told Fox News that the mere fact the response time has been reported in academic documents does not authorize government officials who hold a security clearance, or had previous access to classified information, to discuss it publicly."
She seems to be getting pass after pass, I just don't get it.
Clinton's Debate Reference To Nuclear Response Rekindles Judgment Questions
Posted from foxnews.com
Election 2016
Hillary Clinton
Donald Trump
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 8
5
5
0
It shows me how much she can be trusted when it comes to National Security... NOT A BIT!
(5)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
Do you think that a Navy SEAL would know more about it than you do or I do? The number has been published in official documentation multiple times and and even tours of NORAD used to quote the number that was then current. the time it takse for a depressed trajectory missile to hit DC is a matter of physics and MAD requires that we be able to react in a shorter time, it also requires that out potential enemies KNOW that we can do so. Keeping this secret would be idiotic.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr - It struck me as wrong when she said on during the debate. Not something that one would publish or broadcast.
(0)
(0)
1stSgt Nelson Kerr
Thnk about how the MAD stratagy works, having you opponent know that you can react in time is an essential part of that strategy, For It to work they must know that a decapitating nuclear Strike is rued out by the laws of physics.
(0)
(0)
4
4
0
Nor do I. It's one thing for something to be printed or said by outsiders, but when someone in government acknowledges it, then it is considered fact. I learned that long ago when first gaining a security clearance.
(4)
(0)
3
3
0
LT you would have to be a Democrat to understand it.
I guess she doesn't recall what OPSEC is either.
I guess she doesn't recall what OPSEC is either.
(3)
(0)
SGM Steve Wettstein
PO1 John Crafton - I am wondering if SEC State would be privy to that info or more than likely when she was FLOTUS?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google