Posted on Oct 17, 2016
CNN claims that it’s illegal for you to read Wikileaks documents without their filter
957
9
13
4
4
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 5
SGT (Join to see)
Great comment SPC Greg K.. I haven't watched CNN I so long, I remember the reason with your post.
(0)
(0)
SPC Greg K.
The arrogance, pretentiousness, and condescension of those people are disgusting. Stick with Fox News. I watch both and it's absolutely AMAZING all the news stories that Fox talks about and CNN, NBC, ABC and the rest simply don't report You will NEVER get the true story form them...it's SCARY!!! Fox News covers most aspects, they too have their downfalls but cover sooooo much more.
(0)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
Good question SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth. Maybe CNN is trying to be too big for their britches.
(0)
(0)
Not that I agree with CNN here, but for some (most) military folk, it IS a violation to possess or read Classified material on an Unclass system. I suspect that many documents in the Wikileaks folder are still, technically, Classified. Just because something has been released to the public doesn't make it Unclass - and therefore, many of those documents are still Classified and shouldn't be on Unclass systems.
I understand that it's a bit of a pickle that it puts the military (or government employees) in because, essentially, the rest of the world can see these documents, but it would be spillage for a military member to have it on their systems.
That being said, I am not a lawyer, so do what works for you!
I understand that it's a bit of a pickle that it puts the military (or government employees) in because, essentially, the rest of the world can see these documents, but it would be spillage for a military member to have it on their systems.
That being said, I am not a lawyer, so do what works for you!
(1)
(0)
SPC Greg K.
I see what you're saying here but, having an "unclassified" system is still a "classisfied" system...it's "classified" as "unclassified" or "FOUO"...which is different than info that is declassified. Personal systems are not associated with a "classification" as such and are not subject to monitoring. Nor do you have to consent to monitoring on your personal system...ie...personal laptop or smart phone. So, if someone were to Google the wikileak documents on their own system and read it, you're not violating any rules. If you were to read something that was leaked to the public and does have a "classification" marking on it, it's not a violation to the reader but to the releaser. Yes, you are correct that just because a document has a classification marking on it, and is released to the public, does not change the "classification" of the content. But that doesn't mean that CNN or any media has exclusive rights to it either. And, it doesn't mean the reader has violated anything. Correct me if if I'm wrong, but, I think what you mean is that when you hear something on the news, that you know to have a certain "classification", it doesn't mean it has been declassified (which is different than "unclassified") and should not be discussed as if it were declassified. Furthermore, the Communist News Network (CNN) has no authority to dictate what a U.S. citizen (or anyone for that matter) can and can't read on wikileak. IMHO...I'm not a lawyer either but did stay at a Holliday Inn Express.
(0)
(0)
MAJ Bryan Zeski
SPC Greg K. - And I completely understand that. However, if I put knowing Classified documents on my personal laptop, I still think that would could as spillage.
And I'm definitely not saying that any media outlet has any more right to it than the American public. But, oddly enough, the American public HAS more rights to "leaked" documents than Active military members do.
And I'm definitely not saying that any media outlet has any more right to it than the American public. But, oddly enough, the American public HAS more rights to "leaked" documents than Active military members do.
(1)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next