Posted on Sep 29, 2016
Endorsement: Libertarian Gary Johnson for president
5.5K
49
42
6
6
0
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 10
After his last gaff, I'm not so sure any more. If you can't name a single world leader and don't know what Aleppo is, I am forced to question your foreign policy chops.
(7)
(0)
SFC Adam Potter
Hell, I can't name any living world leader I look up to. I can name plenty of Infamous world leaders!
(1)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
His VP pick appears to be far more knowledgeable on the issues and world leaders then him
(0)
(0)
PFC Jim Wheeler
LTC (Join to see) - On some level that's probably how it should be.
You pick a running mate who strengthens your weaknesses to provide the most well rounded ticket you can.
You pick a running mate who strengthens your weaknesses to provide the most well rounded ticket you can.
(0)
(0)
Historically a vote for the third party candidate is a vote against the republican nomoniee for president.
(3)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - Yes you are correct Nader took votes from Gore, I did not say always I said historically. So I see your Gore and raise you:
Roosevelt denied Taft the election, Wallace screwed Humphrey, that gave us Nixon and we all know how that turned out. Then, of course, there was Perot’s undermining of Bush that gave us the famous quote “that depends on what your definition of is is”
So a vote for Johnson almost guarantees that all the injustice that is going on now will be cemented in time once HC is elected. We will never learn the whole truth on the emails nor see anyone prosecuted for that crime. The Clinton Foundation will see a windfall of funds followed by presidential favors. Kill someone you will only need a cool billion to the foundation and shazam a presidential pardon. I could go on and on.
Roosevelt denied Taft the election, Wallace screwed Humphrey, that gave us Nixon and we all know how that turned out. Then, of course, there was Perot’s undermining of Bush that gave us the famous quote “that depends on what your definition of is is”
So a vote for Johnson almost guarantees that all the injustice that is going on now will be cemented in time once HC is elected. We will never learn the whole truth on the emails nor see anyone prosecuted for that crime. The Clinton Foundation will see a windfall of funds followed by presidential favors. Kill someone you will only need a cool billion to the foundation and shazam a presidential pardon. I could go on and on.
(0)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
LCDR (Join to see) - Johnson appears to be pulling about equally from Trump and Clinton, while Stein is pulling only from Clinton.
Anyway, My sincere hope is that Clinton wins. I am a social liberal and a fiscal moderate, and see Trump as the most dangerously incompetent candidate of our entire history.
Even with a "good" Republican (I donated to both Graham and Bush in the same maximum amount I did to Clinton), I would still vote for Clinton because my biggest issue this cycle is the Supreme Court, and I absolutely do NOT want a religious conservative majority protecting a fundamentalist Christian's right to discriminate, undoing marriage equality or taking away a woman's right to choose.
Anyway, My sincere hope is that Clinton wins. I am a social liberal and a fiscal moderate, and see Trump as the most dangerously incompetent candidate of our entire history.
Even with a "good" Republican (I donated to both Graham and Bush in the same maximum amount I did to Clinton), I would still vote for Clinton because my biggest issue this cycle is the Supreme Court, and I absolutely do NOT want a religious conservative majority protecting a fundamentalist Christian's right to discriminate, undoing marriage equality or taking away a woman's right to choose.
(1)
(0)
LCDR (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - Well those are at least clear reasons to support your candidate.
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
Read This Next