3
3
0
The United States has become far too locked in a defensive isolationist mindset to effectively address the threats rising in the world today, specifically in the fields of technologically advanced transnational terrorist organizations; cyberespionage, cyber warfare, and international cyber law with regards to the Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC) (or the lack thereof); robotics, including nanotechnologies, A.I., and weapon applications; and even global economics, and the major impact that the growing human population is having on the resources available on Earth – which bleeds over into the realm of space exploration and planetary resource harvesting. The United States is not leading in any of these, and as the world’s greatest hope for a future where Humanity is free, this is a problem.
With a primarily defensive strategy to combat transnational terrorists, the United States will remain perpetually in a reactive state of terror, unable to ever bring the conflict to a conclusion. At the same time, a heavily military offensive strategy to combat terrorism, without addressing the root problems that are bringing younger generations into the terrorist ideologies, will only exacerbate the problem even further, and result in more widespread terrorism, a higher rate of recruitment, and more advanced allies and partners to help them achieve their objective of destroying America and the West.
Maintaining the same defensive posture with regards to international cyber law has a direct correlation to transnational terrorism as well, since the international laws that do exist regulate the United States in warfare, but do not regulate terrorist organizations. As these organizations become technologically adept, they spread, and gain more knowledge and more technologies along the way, giving them many of the cyber capabilities of a first world Nation, while they remain unaffected by the few international cyber regulations that hinder American cyber operations targeting them.
Japan and China are leading the robotics industry, and they have been for some time. This gives them and whoever they deal with a potentially game-changing combat advantage against American forces. Robotics are advancing weapon systems in remarkable ways, from automation, to guidance systems, and even approaching science fiction type cyborg assemblies that may result in robots replacing boots on the ground. Nanoscience has been adapted for medical purposes to infiltrate the human body, and replicate symptoms, which undoubtedly will transfer into military uses that include biological and chemical warfare on a nano scale. Robotics and nanoscience have also merged to create nanobots, which can be remote controlled, and can kill. Computer science is another field that has been advanced by nanoscience and nanobots, creating Artificial Intelligence based on a series of nanobots working together as a simulated brain. What can America do if faced with a technologically advanced enemy that has robotic, nano, and A.I. superiority, especially if those superiorities have been applied to weapon systems?
With a defensive economic stance in the world, several nations, particularly India, China, and Saudi Arabia, are greatly benefitting from enhanced resource availability in their countries, while the United States economy is nearly shrinking on an annual basis. Farmland in the U.S. is at nearly full capacity for harvesting because of land deterioration problems that arise without crop rotations. There are no underground watersheds in the United States, so non-imported American drinking water is reliant on mountain streams and other small sources of freshwater, with Canada being in control of the largest watershed in North America. Rare earth metals are quickly becoming scarce in the United States, to the point where the international space race to claim the Moon and Mars has become a top priority not just for control over them, but for the resources that are to be mined from within. Uranium, and the volatile radon gas that comes with it, are actually on the economic radar as a good idea for boosting the American economy, instead of remaining too dangerous to mine and not worth the health risks and environmental hazards – a resource that is in abundance on the Moon.
In order to change this course, the United States needs to shift into a primarily offensive mindset in every category, from economics to robotics to transnational terrorism. Offensive trade agreements can reverse the downward economic trend in America, and eventually lead to a united global economic system where food and water become global resources, and prevent Humans from dying of starvation or thirst. Global Federalism in the realm of economics, specifically for Human needs, not wants, can work, much like Federalism in the United States works and prevents one State from starving while another has more food than they need. Offensive international cyber regulations have the capacity to deter and prevent the majority of negative cyber activities that take place, but it would require the United States to also cease those activities, and comply with international cyber laws. Offensive aggressive scientific research and funding in the fields mentioned above, including free market competitiveness and Federal research grants, can unbind the hands of American scientists, and perhaps America can catch up to Japan and China's technologies.
Technological advances are directly related to the international space race as well. The importance of a free nation, not an authoritarian nation, leading the world in space efforts, can provide the opportunity of a peaceful entrance into space – an opportunity that surely will degrade into space warfare if Russia or China gains space superiority first, especially a Lunar base or a Mars colony. And finally, an Aggressive Strategic Offensive Counterintelligence (ASOCI) strategy and mindset for intelligence and military operations, specifically to combat transnational terrorism, is the only way that this rising global conflict can be addressed and brought to conclusion.
The United States Intelligence Community must know their enemy in order to defeat them, and in knowing them, the facts must be acknowledged, and problems addressed – problems like infrastructure, food shortages, water shortages, education, knowledge, and justice. By addressing these problems, and through addressing them, leading a whole people towards freedom, transnational terrorism will lose its foundation. It will lose its generational re-enforcements, and the elements that already exist can be destroyed through overwhelming military force and a global targeted killing coalition, enhanced by improvements to international laws governing targeted killings, in order to end this never-ending war and usher in a free and prosperous Human future.
America needs to shift from Defense to Offense, or freedom will be lost forever.
With a primarily defensive strategy to combat transnational terrorists, the United States will remain perpetually in a reactive state of terror, unable to ever bring the conflict to a conclusion. At the same time, a heavily military offensive strategy to combat terrorism, without addressing the root problems that are bringing younger generations into the terrorist ideologies, will only exacerbate the problem even further, and result in more widespread terrorism, a higher rate of recruitment, and more advanced allies and partners to help them achieve their objective of destroying America and the West.
Maintaining the same defensive posture with regards to international cyber law has a direct correlation to transnational terrorism as well, since the international laws that do exist regulate the United States in warfare, but do not regulate terrorist organizations. As these organizations become technologically adept, they spread, and gain more knowledge and more technologies along the way, giving them many of the cyber capabilities of a first world Nation, while they remain unaffected by the few international cyber regulations that hinder American cyber operations targeting them.
Japan and China are leading the robotics industry, and they have been for some time. This gives them and whoever they deal with a potentially game-changing combat advantage against American forces. Robotics are advancing weapon systems in remarkable ways, from automation, to guidance systems, and even approaching science fiction type cyborg assemblies that may result in robots replacing boots on the ground. Nanoscience has been adapted for medical purposes to infiltrate the human body, and replicate symptoms, which undoubtedly will transfer into military uses that include biological and chemical warfare on a nano scale. Robotics and nanoscience have also merged to create nanobots, which can be remote controlled, and can kill. Computer science is another field that has been advanced by nanoscience and nanobots, creating Artificial Intelligence based on a series of nanobots working together as a simulated brain. What can America do if faced with a technologically advanced enemy that has robotic, nano, and A.I. superiority, especially if those superiorities have been applied to weapon systems?
With a defensive economic stance in the world, several nations, particularly India, China, and Saudi Arabia, are greatly benefitting from enhanced resource availability in their countries, while the United States economy is nearly shrinking on an annual basis. Farmland in the U.S. is at nearly full capacity for harvesting because of land deterioration problems that arise without crop rotations. There are no underground watersheds in the United States, so non-imported American drinking water is reliant on mountain streams and other small sources of freshwater, with Canada being in control of the largest watershed in North America. Rare earth metals are quickly becoming scarce in the United States, to the point where the international space race to claim the Moon and Mars has become a top priority not just for control over them, but for the resources that are to be mined from within. Uranium, and the volatile radon gas that comes with it, are actually on the economic radar as a good idea for boosting the American economy, instead of remaining too dangerous to mine and not worth the health risks and environmental hazards – a resource that is in abundance on the Moon.
In order to change this course, the United States needs to shift into a primarily offensive mindset in every category, from economics to robotics to transnational terrorism. Offensive trade agreements can reverse the downward economic trend in America, and eventually lead to a united global economic system where food and water become global resources, and prevent Humans from dying of starvation or thirst. Global Federalism in the realm of economics, specifically for Human needs, not wants, can work, much like Federalism in the United States works and prevents one State from starving while another has more food than they need. Offensive international cyber regulations have the capacity to deter and prevent the majority of negative cyber activities that take place, but it would require the United States to also cease those activities, and comply with international cyber laws. Offensive aggressive scientific research and funding in the fields mentioned above, including free market competitiveness and Federal research grants, can unbind the hands of American scientists, and perhaps America can catch up to Japan and China's technologies.
Technological advances are directly related to the international space race as well. The importance of a free nation, not an authoritarian nation, leading the world in space efforts, can provide the opportunity of a peaceful entrance into space – an opportunity that surely will degrade into space warfare if Russia or China gains space superiority first, especially a Lunar base or a Mars colony. And finally, an Aggressive Strategic Offensive Counterintelligence (ASOCI) strategy and mindset for intelligence and military operations, specifically to combat transnational terrorism, is the only way that this rising global conflict can be addressed and brought to conclusion.
The United States Intelligence Community must know their enemy in order to defeat them, and in knowing them, the facts must be acknowledged, and problems addressed – problems like infrastructure, food shortages, water shortages, education, knowledge, and justice. By addressing these problems, and through addressing them, leading a whole people towards freedom, transnational terrorism will lose its foundation. It will lose its generational re-enforcements, and the elements that already exist can be destroyed through overwhelming military force and a global targeted killing coalition, enhanced by improvements to international laws governing targeted killings, in order to end this never-ending war and usher in a free and prosperous Human future.
America needs to shift from Defense to Offense, or freedom will be lost forever.
SASC_Unclassified_2016_ATA_SFR_FINAL.pdf
Posted from dni.gov
Foreign Policy
Economics
Terrorism
Technology
Strategy
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
1
1
0
True. But the politician of today cares NOT for the American Public. (S)He cares only for "how can this benefit me?" As long as we have "Career Politicians" we will continue to have a Government that is "Of the Politician, for the Politician, and enriching the Politician"
We allowed our tech firms to move offshore to save them taxes, (not pay them to US). We sell weapon systems to countries with unstable governments only to have to fight against the weapons with our youth.
Citizens are giving up the dream. They have no faith in Government (except faith that they will raise taxes and prosecute us little people if we step out of line). That guy from the FBI asking Americans to "please have faith in the FBI" reminds me of an old joke: A man asks a woman if she will sleep with him for $1M. She says yes. He says "how about $100?" She says "what kind of woman do you think I am?" He replies "I thought we settled that, now we are dickering price!" When the FBI decided NOT to prosecute HRC, they set the initial price. Now the Americans want to know how much dickering there is in the price.
We allowed our tech firms to move offshore to save them taxes, (not pay them to US). We sell weapon systems to countries with unstable governments only to have to fight against the weapons with our youth.
Citizens are giving up the dream. They have no faith in Government (except faith that they will raise taxes and prosecute us little people if we step out of line). That guy from the FBI asking Americans to "please have faith in the FBI" reminds me of an old joke: A man asks a woman if she will sleep with him for $1M. She says yes. He says "how about $100?" She says "what kind of woman do you think I am?" He replies "I thought we settled that, now we are dickering price!" When the FBI decided NOT to prosecute HRC, they set the initial price. Now the Americans want to know how much dickering there is in the price.
(1)
(0)
SGT (Join to see)
The Simple Flat Tax Plan Summary | Ted Cruz for Senate
The Simple Flat Tax Plan Summary “Imagine 4.9 million new jobs. Instead of Obama’s income stagnation, imagine average wages rising 12.2 percent over the next decade. Capital investment rising 43.9 percent. And every income-level seeing double-digit increases in after-tax income. Imagine exports and manufacturing jobs booming. Our trade deficit falling as the tax bias against American made goods is eliminated. …
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
I guess if its not Kim Kardashian or other stupid people getting fat and stupid, some people here are not interested.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google