Responses: 9
Wow. "If compromise is the key to healthy politics, how does one respond when compromise descends into complicity? To preserve a sense of our personal moral accountability we must each define boundaries. For those boundaries to have meaning we must have the courage to protect them, even when the cost is high."
This is something I've been trying to articulate to my friends on both side of the D/R aisle. At some point, enough has to be enough.
This is something I've been trying to articulate to my friends on both side of the D/R aisle. At some point, enough has to be enough.
(5)
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Inaccurate. It implies that we have a binary system. We don't as we also have the potential of "Null" votes, making it at least "three party system" with one choice being "None of the Above."
You can vote against BOTH current candidates, either by withholding your vote (to them) or by abstaining completely. The beauty of our system is that by not voting for either of these candidates, you are not complicit with either of their "platter of goods." Choosing to vote for a Lesser of Evils is still voting for EVIL. It doesn't matter which side that happens to be.
You can vote against BOTH current candidates, either by withholding your vote (to them) or by abstaining completely. The beauty of our system is that by not voting for either of these candidates, you are not complicit with either of their "platter of goods." Choosing to vote for a Lesser of Evils is still voting for EVIL. It doesn't matter which side that happens to be.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next