Posted on May 31, 2016
Former State Dept. watchdog debunks central Clinton email claim | Fox News
2.24K
22
9
6
6
0
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 5
PO2 Mark Saffell Everybody who has ever handled or been entrusted with classified information knows she violated the law and should be indicted, prosecuted and convicted.
What remains to bee seen is if President Obama and Attorney General Lynch put politics over the rule of law. He has certainly demonstrated, in the past, that he is not above that. If that occurs, I hope there is such an outcry that impeachment proceedings are started for AG Lynch, if not Obama.
What remains to bee seen is if President Obama and Attorney General Lynch put politics over the rule of law. He has certainly demonstrated, in the past, that he is not above that. If that occurs, I hope there is such an outcry that impeachment proceedings are started for AG Lynch, if not Obama.
(5)
(0)
In a way, it is good that the FBI director has decided to move so slowly. It has provided the time needed for bits and pieces of the truth to come together in a way that refute HRC's earlier claims. Every piece makes the case stronger against her.
(3)
(0)
Sgt Tom Cunnally
I could be completely wrong since I am not a Constitutional or National Security expert but I think the FBI is doing a thorough job with their investigation because they may just charge her with criminal wrongdoing for mishandling classified data. The fact that Hillary used an unsecure email server in her home that we now know was hacked at least twice has to be a violation of the National Security Laws for handling classified information. Also if the FBI questions Hillary and she claims the same nonsense she has been spinning lately that is called "Lying to the FBI" and is a crime. She has lied so much about her emails and server that it would be almost impossible for her to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. And I think she might well have to swear to tell the truth to the FBI . Hillary has problems telling the truth since she has been so good at lying for a lot of years.
(1)
(0)
PO2 Mark Saffell
I believe she swore under oath to a judge things that have now been proven to be a lie, like did she turn over all work related emails and she swore she did and then they found work related emails on that Sydney guys system that proves she lied under oath to a judge. Why has she already been charged with that.?? Its already proven she committed purgery.
(0)
(0)
Bottom line...she needs to be brought to trial and not allowed to run for president. I bet Obama and his administration will kill that option if only because it might open the door to increased scrutiny of Valarie Jarrod (sp?) and others.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next