3
3
0
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/04/election-trump-clinton-secure-wins-northeast [login to see] 57930.html
There are other links that say the same thing, but I picked this one to keep all those people who believe in fairy tales and "just know" that anything that is published in al-Jazeera is a total lie happy.
There are other links that say the same thing, but I picked this one to keep all those people who believe in fairy tales and "just know" that anything that is published in al-Jazeera is a total lie happy.
US election: Trump and Clinton win in Northeast poll
Posted from aljazeera.com
Election 2016
Republicans
Democrats
Politics
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
3
3
0
It's time for Hillary and Donald to assemble their teams and let us look at those. We the People seem to dislike both and, except for a few zealots, are basing are votes on the one we don't want. If there is to be any hope of sanity in November, we need to see the team that we will be electing to guide the next Administration. Voting for either of these clowns is just to painful to contemplate.
(3)
(0)
SPC Randy Torgerson
COL Ted Mc - I stand corrected. But I will add that what I was thinking was that a President elect wins on about 28% of all Americans. Though that was even wrong because in 2012 Obama won with 66 million votes. If you take all the people in America (not just eligible voters) who are effected by our President, in 2012 Obama won with 21% of America behind him. Granted its a low number no matter who is elected. But I am just explaining what was in my head when I said what I said. But thank you for detailing that information.
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
SPC Randy Torgerson - Spec; Your argument that we shouldn't limit our consideration to simply "eligible voters" since the action of the President of the United States of America affects ALL Americans is a good one.
On the other hand, the actions of the President of the United States of America affects everyone in the whole world so if we are going to expand the "population" being considered there is no logical reason for stopping with just the population of the US. This means that President Obama received a minuscule 0.94% "of the vote" if we take your original proposition to its logical extreme.
On the other hand, the actions of the President of the United States of America affects everyone in the whole world so if we are going to expand the "population" being considered there is no logical reason for stopping with just the population of the US. This means that President Obama received a minuscule 0.94% "of the vote" if we take your original proposition to its logical extreme.
(0)
(0)
SPC Randy Torgerson
COL Ted Mc - I know, its a crazy view but I wish more people got involved. And I really mean more adults...... We need more people then just the school age, unemployed and unions members to get involved. Idk, its such an arbitrary discussion. Thank you though for your comments. I hate it when the facts don't back up what I say hahaha.
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
SPC Randy Torgerson - Spec; There are already people beyond "... the school age, unemployed and unions members ..." who are involved. They are the people who fund PACs.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Yeeeeeee Haaaaaaaw!!!!! A Redneck with a Turkey Neck and an insane Yankee Businessman! Sweet! I swore to never vote for anything that came outa Arkansas. I swore to never vote for another Clinton ever again too. Plus, Rednecks and I don't get along well.
The K&C guys are both knuckle draggers and that Socialists (that likes people knowing he's a socialist) scares the heck out of me. I think my Latina wife is right about this election cycle. Maybe we need an insane businessman at the helm of our country for 4 years. This would allow us to gauge if the politicians are willing to work for their money or just continue to lie to us about all the things they "Accomplish."
The K&C guys are both knuckle draggers and that Socialists (that likes people knowing he's a socialist) scares the heck out of me. I think my Latina wife is right about this election cycle. Maybe we need an insane businessman at the helm of our country for 4 years. This would allow us to gauge if the politicians are willing to work for their money or just continue to lie to us about all the things they "Accomplish."
(1)
(0)
Sgt Tom Vaughn
I never met " red necks " as you say that I did.nit like , but then again most city people I meet are so far out of touch with reality is sad , but I do agree with your wife , it's time to not vote for politicians , and never a socialist or drmocrat pig like Hillary the butcher if Benghazi
By the way. Those red necks you talk about , I'm not sure what or who you reffer to as red necks , but the young people who have grown up on the cattle ranch's and farms around me have 95% of the kids are collage educated with at least a 4 year degree
I don't know of any city that can make that claim , and most are home schooled ??
Maybe we should have more farm raised teachers in city schools ???
Tell your wife she had my vote
By the way. Those red necks you talk about , I'm not sure what or who you reffer to as red necks , but the young people who have grown up on the cattle ranch's and farms around me have 95% of the kids are collage educated with at least a 4 year degree
I don't know of any city that can make that claim , and most are home schooled ??
Maybe we should have more farm raised teachers in city schools ???
Tell your wife she had my vote
(0)
(0)
MSgt (Join to see)
Being from the South, I have a different view of what a true Red Neck is. Being Country is not being a Red Neck. I am country. MY children are slightly country, my wife is becoming country. None of us are Red Necks. Most of my family are Creoles and Coon Asses.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Like it or not, there two will almost certainly be our two general election nominees. Choose wisely.
(0)
(0)
COL Ted Mc
LT (Join to see) - Lieutenant; Why do I feel like saying "Gee Mr. Bear, should I hit the beehive with a stick or should I kick it?"?
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google