3
3
0
Edited >1 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 2
"The makers of our Constitution understood the need to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness, and the protections guaranteed by this are much broader in scope, and include the right to life and an inviolate personality -- the right to be left alone -- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. The principle underlying the Fourth and Fifth Amendments is protection against invasions of the sanctities of a man's home and privacies of life. This is a recognition of the significance of man's spiritual nature, his feelings, and his intellect." -- Justice Brandeis's dissent in Olmstead v. U. S. (1928)
I ran across this quote. It was used in an academic paper discussing the occasions when the human rights of one individual or group interfere with the human rights of another individual or group. A situation that I honestly had never taken the time to consider.
I believe that the LGBTQ community is quite right to be impatient in its expectation of the extension of the entire spectrum of human rights that the cisgender community may take for granted, including life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I also believe that the cisgender community is quite right to be defensive of their entire spectrum of human rights including freedom of religion, freedom of association, and the right to privacy that they now enjoy, but feel are endangered.
It is intellectually honest to recognize the truth of each sides argument. Unfortunately, a fair and equitable solution will take a better mind than mine. For now I will do my utmost to be personally respectful of the truth of each sides position.
I ran across this quote. It was used in an academic paper discussing the occasions when the human rights of one individual or group interfere with the human rights of another individual or group. A situation that I honestly had never taken the time to consider.
I believe that the LGBTQ community is quite right to be impatient in its expectation of the extension of the entire spectrum of human rights that the cisgender community may take for granted, including life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
I also believe that the cisgender community is quite right to be defensive of their entire spectrum of human rights including freedom of religion, freedom of association, and the right to privacy that they now enjoy, but feel are endangered.
It is intellectually honest to recognize the truth of each sides argument. Unfortunately, a fair and equitable solution will take a better mind than mine. For now I will do my utmost to be personally respectful of the truth of each sides position.
(4)
(0)
Bigotry is always bad business and Justifying it in Law doesn't make it any better, Sanctifying it using Religion is just as bad. Just think of the Nuremberg Laws.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next