US military won't hold ISIS detainees more than 30 days, policy not 'nailed down' | Fox News

I was interested to learn that the ISIL chemical munitions leader captured recently had been turned over to the Iraqi government in Baghdad IAW the 30 day hold policy. According to this recent report the length of time before captured ISIL operatives are turned over is subject to review. I hope "we" are extracting as much as intelligence from these captives and what they are captured with as we can before they are turned over. From what I understand there is no requirement to turn over captured material of intel value to Iraq.
"The U.S. military has no plans to hold captured Islamic State operatives for more than a month before turning them over to the Iraqi government, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition based in Baghdad told reporters Friday.
“Fourteen to 30 days is a ballpark figure, but even that is not really completely nailed down,” said Col. Steve Warren, a U.S. military spokesman based in Baghdad. “There isn’t a hard definition of short-term.”
On Thursday, Pentagon Press Secretary Peter Cook also made clear that the policy for holding operatives is, at best, evolving. He said they would be handled on a “case-by-case” basis over a “short-term” period.
The lack of a well-defined policy for handling captured ISIS terrorists is in turn raising concerns on Capitol Hill.
“The law requires a comprehensive detainee policy,” a congressional aide said. “By definition, ‘we’ll figure it out if we ever capture anyone’ is not a comprehensive policy. “
Some on Capitol Hill are concerned the vague short-term detention policy hampers the U.S. military’s ability to gather intelligence, particularly in the wake of administration plans to close the detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Many in Congress, though, are fighting the Gitmo closure push, and some see the center as the solution for what to do about captured ISIS soldiers.
On Thursday, 12 Republican senators, including presidential candidates Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, introduced a resolution to send the captured ISIS fighters to Guantanamo Bay.
Warren acknowledged Friday the U.S. military in Iraq is “not equipped for long-term detention” and “not in that business.”
“As we take people off the battlefield we’re just going to have to make the decisions as we go,” he said.
As one recent example, Cook announced Thursday that Sulayman Dawud al-Bakkar, an ISIS commander in charge of chemical weapons, was turned over to the Iraqi government after being captured by U.S. special operations forces last month.
Intelligence from al-Bakkar’s capture led to two U.S. military strikes near Mosul in the past week, destroying two chemical weapons facilities, Warren said.
Warren said any ISIS detainees turned over to the Iraqi government will be available to U.S. authorities in the future should the need arise to question them.
“This is not a catch-and-release program,” he said. “If we have to go back and talk to them, we’ll go back and talk to them.”
Warren said the U.S. military was not considering building any detention centers to hold ISIS detainees long-term.
When asked about his confidence in the Iraqi government’s ability to hold ISIS prisoners, Warren was absolute.
“We are confident [the Iraqis] can hold them. If some escape, then we’ll just go catch them again or kill ‘em.”
At the CNN Republican debate in Miami on Thursday, Rubio said ISIS detainees need to be put at Guantanamo Bay.
“They’re not going to go to a courtroom in Manhattan. They’re going to go to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and we will find out everything they know and we’ll do so legally,” he said."