Posted on Jan 20, 2016
Attorney General defends executive actions on guns as legal | KSL.com
4.82K
67
32
8
8
0
Attorney General Loretta Lynch defended President Barack Obama's executive actions curbing guns, telling lawmakers Wednesday that the president took lawful, common-sense steps to stem firearms violence that kills and injures tens of thousands of Americans yearly.
Lynch's justification for the moves was immediately attacked by Republicans, who said the measures Obama announced two weeks ago were the latest example of actions by Obama that infringe on the constitutional right to own guns and has overreached his executive branch powers.
Lynch's justification for the moves was immediately attacked by Republicans, who said the measures Obama announced two weeks ago were the latest example of actions by Obama that infringe on the constitutional right to own guns and has overreached his executive branch powers.
Attorney General defends executive actions on guns as legal | KSL.com
Posted from ksl.comPosted in these groups: 
Gun Control
2nd Amendment
Gun Control 2nd Amendment
Edited >1 y ago
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 14
9
9
0
8
8
0
Well it turns out El Chapo had a 50 cal weapon smuggled into Mexico by Holder and Obama's justice department. Interesting, I guess it is OK for Mexican drug lords to have this type of weapon supplied by our government but citizens, nope law abiding citizens can't be trusted!
(8)
(0)
6
6
0
... wonder why the senate confirmed her at the first place .... they know what they are getting ... why they still let her be AG?? it is like an abusive relationship ...
(6)
(0)
LTC (Join to see)
The opposition always claims the president is overreaching. Both President Reagan and Bush I authorized amnesty to certain groups of immigrants that congress had specifically left out of the amnesty bill, because they thought it was the right thing to do. But was there any explosion by the republicans about them not having that authority? Not a peep. But when President Obama did it, it's an unheard of overreach of executive power.
(0)
(0)
PO3 (Join to see)
LTC (Join to see) - no in this level and in so many hot topic in a roll. I can understand the legacy fight, but usually one or two topics, but he is like having a bucket list to finish within these last 11 months. I actually start laugh at my own words .... lol
(1)
(0)
LTC David Brown
LTC Micheal Mathews, I don't think you can say either Bush or Reagan granted amesty with out congress. The understanding was that congress would then secure the border but congress didn't keep up their end.http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/11/the-weak-argument-defending-executive-amnesty/382906/
Reagan and Bush Offer No Precedent for Obama's Amnesty Order
Not only were past executive actions smaller, they didn't work.
(2)
(0)
Capt Seid Waddell
PO3 (Join to see), "wonder why the senate confirmed her at the first place"
Because the alternative was keeping Eric Holder?
Because the alternative was keeping Eric Holder?
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google