Posted on Jul 7, 2024
We Must Build a Talent Innovation Base – For the 21st Century and Beyond
473K
72
9
34
34
0
Strategic competition with China – and its authoritarian fellow travelers: Russia, North Korea, and Iran – is a contest for the future of the world order. Yet, the United States has yet to fully commit to this generational competition – not only in terms of ships, planes, munitions – but also talent.
This debate over the United States’ commitment to this strategic competition for the future of the world order further unfolded late last week during the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) mark-up. SASC Ranking Member Roger Wicker (R-MS) offered an amendment that would bring the overall authorized national defense topline to a notable $923.3 billion – consistent with his recent op-ed in which he asserted “America’s military is not prepared for war – or peace.” While this amendment was adopted as part of the SASC-marked National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, its inclusion catalyzed bipartisan support – both for and against the bill – in its final passage out of committee.
While fiscal considerations have been part of the dialogue, the bulk of the discussion in Washington has focused on preparing the United States from an innovation and technological perspective to effectively compete China – what the US Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy describes as the pacing challenge. This focus on innovation and technology, in part, stems from China’s Xi Jinping generational effort to modernize China’s military. Xi’s “Made in China 2025” is focused on elevating China to the forefront of key technologies such as robotics, artificial intelligence, and aerospace. Meanwhile, Russia's investments in hypersonic weapons and cyber capabilities reflects an alignment with Xi to challenge Western dominance.
These efforts around technological superiority by China and Russia reflect an attempt to achieve an envisioned alternative world order. This vision was further elucidated during a recent state visit between Xi and Putin in which through a 7000-word treatise they doubled down on their “no limits” strategic relationship (announced just weeks before Russia conducted a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022), casting it as a “new era” partnership to deepen the defense and trade engagement between China and Russia – the two most powerful rival states to the United States. Moreover, with Putin’s recent state visit to North Korea – the first in 24 years – a new strategic partnership was forged between Russia and North Korea, aimed at mutual protection in the event of attack, further solidifying a coalition of countries aligned to Xi and Putin’s envisioned alternate world order.
It is reasonable for US policymakers to focus on technological competition as part of this broader strategic competition against the quadruple hydra rivals of the West of China, North Korea, and Iran. Technological innovation is certainly one of the key strengths of democracies. Yet, an exclusive focus on technology misses perhaps an even great superpower of democracies: talent.
Strategic competition with China and Russia might be best characterized by a relentless pursuit of technological superiority. But, in reality, it is a relentless pursuit of talent. In strategic competition with China and Russia and their cronies, talent is the lifeblood that will drive technological breakthroughs and fundamentally determine whether we have a China-led world or a US-led world.
By making a national commitment to build a national infrastructure of talent to solve the critical public problems of our time – from the local to the global – through innovation and entrepreneurship, the United States will not only be building a “talent innovation base” for the 21st century.
We will be ensuring the United States remains the global leader in the 22nd century – and beyond.
Dr. Alex Gallo is a US Army Veteran and author of “Vetspective,” a RallyPoint series that discusses national security, foreign policy, politics, and society and highlights the analysis of thought-leaders, policy analysts, and scholars. Alex is a Senior Vice President with NobleReach Foundation. He also serves as a fellow with George Mason University’s National Security Institute and an adjunct professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University. Follow him on Twitter at @AlexGalloUSA.
Sources:
https://breakingdefense.com/2024/06/sasc-breaks-spending-cap-by-25-billion-in-fy25-defense- policy-bill/
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/29/opinion/us-military-war.html
https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/ [login to see] /-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-
STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF
https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-visit-chinas-xi-deepen-strategic-partnership-2024-05-15/
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/made-china-2025-threat-global-trade
https://www.wsj.com/articles/russias-vladimir-putin-meets-with-chinese-leader-xi-jinping-in-
beijing [login to see] 3
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/kim-jong-un-putin-north-korea-russia-mutual-defense-pact-rcna157903
This debate over the United States’ commitment to this strategic competition for the future of the world order further unfolded late last week during the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) mark-up. SASC Ranking Member Roger Wicker (R-MS) offered an amendment that would bring the overall authorized national defense topline to a notable $923.3 billion – consistent with his recent op-ed in which he asserted “America’s military is not prepared for war – or peace.” While this amendment was adopted as part of the SASC-marked National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, its inclusion catalyzed bipartisan support – both for and against the bill – in its final passage out of committee.
While fiscal considerations have been part of the dialogue, the bulk of the discussion in Washington has focused on preparing the United States from an innovation and technological perspective to effectively compete China – what the US Department of Defense’s National Defense Strategy describes as the pacing challenge. This focus on innovation and technology, in part, stems from China’s Xi Jinping generational effort to modernize China’s military. Xi’s “Made in China 2025” is focused on elevating China to the forefront of key technologies such as robotics, artificial intelligence, and aerospace. Meanwhile, Russia's investments in hypersonic weapons and cyber capabilities reflects an alignment with Xi to challenge Western dominance.
These efforts around technological superiority by China and Russia reflect an attempt to achieve an envisioned alternative world order. This vision was further elucidated during a recent state visit between Xi and Putin in which through a 7000-word treatise they doubled down on their “no limits” strategic relationship (announced just weeks before Russia conducted a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022), casting it as a “new era” partnership to deepen the defense and trade engagement between China and Russia – the two most powerful rival states to the United States. Moreover, with Putin’s recent state visit to North Korea – the first in 24 years – a new strategic partnership was forged between Russia and North Korea, aimed at mutual protection in the event of attack, further solidifying a coalition of countries aligned to Xi and Putin’s envisioned alternate world order.
It is reasonable for US policymakers to focus on technological competition as part of this broader strategic competition against the quadruple hydra rivals of the West of China, North Korea, and Iran. Technological innovation is certainly one of the key strengths of democracies. Yet, an exclusive focus on technology misses perhaps an even great superpower of democracies: talent.
Strategic competition with China and Russia might be best characterized by a relentless pursuit of technological superiority. But, in reality, it is a relentless pursuit of talent. In strategic competition with China and Russia and their cronies, talent is the lifeblood that will drive technological breakthroughs and fundamentally determine whether we have a China-led world or a US-led world.
By making a national commitment to build a national infrastructure of talent to solve the critical public problems of our time – from the local to the global – through innovation and entrepreneurship, the United States will not only be building a “talent innovation base” for the 21st century.
We will be ensuring the United States remains the global leader in the 22nd century – and beyond.
Dr. Alex Gallo is a US Army Veteran and author of “Vetspective,” a RallyPoint series that discusses national security, foreign policy, politics, and society and highlights the analysis of thought-leaders, policy analysts, and scholars. Alex is a Senior Vice President with NobleReach Foundation. He also serves as a fellow with George Mason University’s National Security Institute and an adjunct professor in the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University. Follow him on Twitter at @AlexGalloUSA.
Sources:
https://breakingdefense.com/2024/06/sasc-breaks-spending-cap-by-25-billion-in-fy25-defense- policy-bill/
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/29/opinion/us-military-war.html
https://media.defense.gov/2022/Oct/27/ [login to see] /-1/-1/1/2022-NATIONAL-DEFENSE-
STRATEGY-NPR-MDR.PDF
https://www.reuters.com/world/putin-visit-chinas-xi-deepen-strategic-partnership-2024-05-15/
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/made-china-2025-threat-global-trade
https://www.wsj.com/articles/russias-vladimir-putin-meets-with-chinese-leader-xi-jinping-in-
beijing [login to see] 3
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/kim-jong-un-putin-north-korea-russia-mutual-defense-pact-rcna157903
International Relations
World Affairs
China
Russia
VetSpective
Edited 2 mo ago
Posted 2 mo ago
Responses: 7
8
8
0
7
7
0
7
7
0
Should POTUS Biden ask Congress to take $360 Billion from climate change and reallocate it to...
President Biden told our adversaries on 7-9-2023 that we are low on Artillery ammunition. I bet if President Trump did this in a TV interview, we would have an impeachment proceeding. +++++Update 1-10-2024 The Recent Houthis attack on shipping has caused the US Navy to spend $17 million in shooting down 24 drones in one day. The US Destroyers and US Navy aircraft has expended about $80 million just in the last 2 months. The Stupid Biden...
(7)
(0)
6
6
0
Recruiting and investing into Talent & STEM programs should be a main focus.
Within the last 10 years or more, there has been a huge boost in STEM camps for children as young as 11, perhaps younger. They are also looking to neurodiverse individuals as that they have a singular and tunnel vision point of view in STEM related fields. My daughter, who has autism, had attended one of these camps and ended up running circles around the doctor...she would complete her minor comprehension projects of computer programming within 10mins. The professor became absolutely entranced with her thought process....
eventually he ended up sitting in a desk next to her to observe her problem solving abilities. However, in this powerful ability in problem solving, my daughter has a great disability in socializing, self care, and will trust any adult that comes along.
The article is extremely informative and through provoking :0)
Within the last 10 years or more, there has been a huge boost in STEM camps for children as young as 11, perhaps younger. They are also looking to neurodiverse individuals as that they have a singular and tunnel vision point of view in STEM related fields. My daughter, who has autism, had attended one of these camps and ended up running circles around the doctor...she would complete her minor comprehension projects of computer programming within 10mins. The professor became absolutely entranced with her thought process....
eventually he ended up sitting in a desk next to her to observe her problem solving abilities. However, in this powerful ability in problem solving, my daughter has a great disability in socializing, self care, and will trust any adult that comes along.
The article is extremely informative and through provoking :0)
(6)
(0)
4
4
0
Simple close the holes they use to steal our innovations. Property and intellectual. That probably is most of the problem. Put people in jail. And our enemies will start to lag behind. Then again our current admin
is letting them in left and right or should I say north and south.
is letting them in left and right or should I say north and south.
(4)
(0)
3
3
0
Animated timeline shows how Silicon Valley became a $2.8 trillion neighborhood
Silicon Valley is a name that is synonymous with the technology industry, but when and how did this small area of California become the center of the tech wo...
Never too late to relocate to the epicenter of high tech (and ground zero for international/industrial espionage).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO-8CMdeSHA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UO-8CMdeSHA
(3)
(0)
Bethina Lee
I believe I have heard rumors and seen some that I will not elaborate, about other parts of the US becoming
"The New Silicon Valley"
"The New Silicon Valley"
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
It is incumbent upon governmental support of military leaders who have a vision of military doctrine which impact tactics. Then the requirements will be given to the defense industries whose engineers will pursue the creation of technologically advantageous weapons systems and equipment. This is how it works in preparation for the next war. Sometimes they get it right. Sometimes they get it wrong.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google