Posted on Feb 11, 2016
The Battle of the Brandywine: It was a loss but really a win
7.56K
24
16
14
14
0
September 11, 1777: The Battle of the Brandywine, the largest battle of the Revolutionary War. The Americans lost because Gen. Washington was outmaneuvered, and, quite honestly, outsmarted by Gen. Howe in basic tactics. This battle is not talked about much because the Americans lost and it was not a major turning point of the war. However, I believe that the Americans came out on top despite having lost the battle and their foothold along the Brandywine River blocking Philadelphia.
Capt. Patrick Ferguson of the British army, was a very innovative officer for his time - maybe too much of a maverick to be acceptable for some of his superiors. His military thoughts were way outside the box. Ferguson invented a rifle that was not loaded from the end of the barrel as all muskets were at that time. His rifle was loaded with a screw mechanism above the trigger assembly. A soldier could fire off six shots in a minute compared to two shots from the commonly used style of weapon at the time. Most surprisingly, the rifle could be fired and reloaded from the prone position - unheard of for the rifles of the times.
To the British army’s credit, they recognized he was on to something advantageous and gave him command of a company of troops hand-picked for their shooting abilities and armed them with the new Ferguson rifles. His immediate commander (Gen. Knyphausen) recognized Ferguson’s talent and surprisingly gave him freewill on the battlefield.
Mistake? Perhaps. But hindsight being 20/20, Ferguson and his rifles were simply too far ahead of their times for the style of warfare at the time and the unbending discipline of the 18th century armies to be correctly utilized.
Capt. Ferguson latched onto a British unit called the Queen’s Rangers and began fighting the Americans in the first engagements of combat during the battle. Early on in the battle, Ferguson was severely wounded which prevented him from personally leading his troops in combat for the rest of the fight. Gen. Howe took this opportunity to disband Ferguson’s company and send the members back to their respective line units. Howe was not a fan of Ferguson or his innovative and cutting-edge ideas. Politics in the military were, in some ways, worse in the 18th century than they are presently.
In my opinion, had Ferguson not been wounded and had been able to command his special company during the battle, it would have come to the attention of the British to expand on this rifle and possibly even use them in regular British line units of the time. This would have proven fatal to the American fight for independence. In this case, the Brit’s win was not a loss, but a win for America as well.
Capt. Patrick Ferguson of the British army, was a very innovative officer for his time - maybe too much of a maverick to be acceptable for some of his superiors. His military thoughts were way outside the box. Ferguson invented a rifle that was not loaded from the end of the barrel as all muskets were at that time. His rifle was loaded with a screw mechanism above the trigger assembly. A soldier could fire off six shots in a minute compared to two shots from the commonly used style of weapon at the time. Most surprisingly, the rifle could be fired and reloaded from the prone position - unheard of for the rifles of the times.
To the British army’s credit, they recognized he was on to something advantageous and gave him command of a company of troops hand-picked for their shooting abilities and armed them with the new Ferguson rifles. His immediate commander (Gen. Knyphausen) recognized Ferguson’s talent and surprisingly gave him freewill on the battlefield.
Mistake? Perhaps. But hindsight being 20/20, Ferguson and his rifles were simply too far ahead of their times for the style of warfare at the time and the unbending discipline of the 18th century armies to be correctly utilized.
Capt. Ferguson latched onto a British unit called the Queen’s Rangers and began fighting the Americans in the first engagements of combat during the battle. Early on in the battle, Ferguson was severely wounded which prevented him from personally leading his troops in combat for the rest of the fight. Gen. Howe took this opportunity to disband Ferguson’s company and send the members back to their respective line units. Howe was not a fan of Ferguson or his innovative and cutting-edge ideas. Politics in the military were, in some ways, worse in the 18th century than they are presently.
In my opinion, had Ferguson not been wounded and had been able to command his special company during the battle, it would have come to the attention of the British to expand on this rifle and possibly even use them in regular British line units of the time. This would have proven fatal to the American fight for independence. In this case, the Brit’s win was not a loss, but a win for America as well.
Military History
War of Independence
Command Post
Posted 9 y ago
Responses: 9
2
2
0
The British were fighting a war of attrition against a country of conventional, hostile settlers, unconventional forces, and rugged terrain at times. The militia were not designed nor were they prepared to be linear fighters, they were asymmetric fighters. Their muskets had twice the range of the British muskets, and often would act as snipers to kill the British Leadership. The militia used the terrain to their advantage and were hard to track down as they dispersed into the countryside. Some of them were asked to fire two volleys and conduct a passage of lines. It did not help that the British sometimes made the common mistake of the Romans in Germania where they marched their army column in dense forests to be picked off. An event that led to the complete destruction of 15,000 men or 3 Roman Legions, and three Roman Eagle Staffs.
(2)
(0)
MAJ Ken Landgren
Why do people accuse me of stating something I never said. I never demeaned linear fighting.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Ferguson was eventually killed in battle at Kings Mountain on 7 OCT 1780 in western North Carolina while fighting patriot forces--"over-mountain irregulars" (many were Scotch-Irish hunters/indian fighters) who had crossed into NC from what is now Tennessee--and rebel militia forces from North and South Carolina. The "back water" men from the western side of the Blue Ridge Mountains were armed with long rifles--which were very accurate--and used unconventional 'frontier' tactics. Along with the back water men, on the patriot side were militia forces with Colonel Isaac Shelby, Colonel John Sevier, Colonel Benjamin Cleveland and Colonel Charles McDowell (all from North Carolina), Colonel William Campbell (Virginia), and Colonel James Williams (South Carolina). During the battle on Kings Mountain, Ferguson was hit by a rebel bullet (he was on horseback) and died leaning against a tree. On the patriot side, Colonel Williams was also killed. After Ferguson died his men surrendered to patriot forces. Oddly enough, he was the only British soldier killed in the battle, since all his men were Tories, and thus, like the rebels, also Americans.
(1)
(0)
SFC Jim Mergott
Here is another interesting fact about the Ferguson rifle. There is only one known original out of the rifles that were used in Brandywine. It actually resurfaced during the Civil war in North Carolina.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Great example of a missed opportunity. Where victory brings complacency, defeat breeds innovation. Seems to be a common trend throughout military history, why fix what isn't broken, or improve what already works. Think of the impact this rifle would have had in the hands of irregular forces such as Rogers' Queens Rangers and Simcoe's Rangers harassing and disrupting Colonial supply lines.
(1)
(0)
SFC Jim Mergott
Yes.I find it fascinating how we can learn from the past by analyzing "what if " type scenarios from past battles. Kind of like an AAR but not really.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google