34
26
8
Obama has proven to be feckless and ineffective.
Government
Office of the President (POTUS)
Politics
Barack Obama
Edited 8 y ago
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 136
1
1
0
If he was so great, why would people be questioning his legitimacy and loyalty to our Constitution?
U.S. Military Constitutionally Obligated to Arrest Obama, Congress for Treason The Constitution
Defending the Constitution from domestic threats requires arresting elected officials for treason.
(1)
(0)
PO2 Robert Cuminale
The typical Liberal's response to any criticism of Obama. The most divisive hater of the Constitution in the history of this country.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Capt Walter Miller
You can't show that in the record.
Rallypoint is full of racists. That much is plain.
Walt
Rallypoint is full of racists. That much is plain.
Walt
(0)
(0)
Sgt Tom Cunnally
88 Senators “Gravely Concerned” over Obama Administration Funding of Hamas Terrorist-Led...
Meet the Palestinian Unity Government and their newest members, the officially designated terrorist group Hamas . Hamas, responsible for thousands of...
(0)
(0)
Sgt Tom Cunnally
"Rallypoint is full of racists. That much is plain".........Capt Walter Miller
Again you keep saying this ....care to identify the so called "Racists" here at Rallypoint??
Again you keep saying this ....care to identify the so called "Racists" here at Rallypoint??
(0)
(0)
MCPO Roger Collins
Leaving aside the fact most of us of all stripes either agree with each other or provide good logic for our arguments. I think Walt spends too much time in front of the mirror, or is just trolling again. After that statement, I'm kind of surprised one of the Mods didn't take him to the woodshed.
(2)
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
Sgt Tom Cunnally -
Politics | Mon Jun 2, 2014 8:50pm EDT
"President Barack Obama's administration said on Monday it plans to work with and fund the new Palestinian unity government, and Israel immediately voiced its disappointment with the decision also criticized by some U.S. lawmakers.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas swore in a unity government on Monday in a reconciliation deal with Hamas Islamists, who advocate Israel's destruction.
The United States views Hamas as a "terrorist" organization and the U.S. Congress has imposed restrictions on funding for the Palestinian Authority, which typically runs at $500 million a year, in the event of a unity government.
Senior U.S. lawmakers said Washington should suspend aid until it is sure of the Islamist group's commitment to pursuing peace with Israel.
In its first comment since the Palestinian government was sworn in, however, the State Department stressed that it regarded the new cabinet as made up of technocrats and was willing to do business with it.
"At this point, it appears that President Abbas has formed an interim technocratic government that does not include ministers affiliated with Hamas," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters at a press briefing.
"Based on what we know now we intend to work with this government but will be watching closely to ensure that it upholds principles that President Abbas reiterated today," she said, referring to Abbas' commitment to honor past peace deals."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/03/us-palestinian-unity-usa-idUSKBN0ED1VQ20140603
Politics | Mon Jun 2, 2014 8:50pm EDT
"President Barack Obama's administration said on Monday it plans to work with and fund the new Palestinian unity government, and Israel immediately voiced its disappointment with the decision also criticized by some U.S. lawmakers.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas swore in a unity government on Monday in a reconciliation deal with Hamas Islamists, who advocate Israel's destruction.
The United States views Hamas as a "terrorist" organization and the U.S. Congress has imposed restrictions on funding for the Palestinian Authority, which typically runs at $500 million a year, in the event of a unity government.
Senior U.S. lawmakers said Washington should suspend aid until it is sure of the Islamist group's commitment to pursuing peace with Israel.
In its first comment since the Palestinian government was sworn in, however, the State Department stressed that it regarded the new cabinet as made up of technocrats and was willing to do business with it.
"At this point, it appears that President Abbas has formed an interim technocratic government that does not include ministers affiliated with Hamas," State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters at a press briefing.
"Based on what we know now we intend to work with this government but will be watching closely to ensure that it upholds principles that President Abbas reiterated today," she said, referring to Abbas' commitment to honor past peace deals."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/06/03/us-palestinian-unity-usa-idUSKBN0ED1VQ20140603
Obama administration to work with Palestinian unity government
President Barack Obama's administration said on Monday it plans to work with and fund the new Palestinian unity government, and Israel immediately voiced its disappointment with the decision also criticized by some U.S. lawmakers.
(0)
(0)
Sgt Tom Cunnally
Capt Walter Miller -
Uphold the Law: No Deals with Jihadists
The Obama Administration is violating the law in its quest to appease jihadists.
It has reportedly engaged in secret talks with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization that kills Israeli children, and has agreed to recognize and fund the Palestinian Authority’s new government that includes Hamas.
These actions violated the law and benefited Islamic radicals. This is intolerable. It’s time for accountability.
Defend the Law and Defend the United States: No Deals With Terrorists
Mr. President,
You swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately, you have disregarded the law to pursue a strategy of appeasement. You’re placing American security at risk, and you’ve betrayed our close ally Israel. Appeasement will not work. Uphold the law and make no deals with terrorist radicals.
Uphold the Law: No Deals with Jihadists
The Obama Administration is violating the law in its quest to appease jihadists.
It has reportedly engaged in secret talks with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization that kills Israeli children, and has agreed to recognize and fund the Palestinian Authority’s new government that includes Hamas.
These actions violated the law and benefited Islamic radicals. This is intolerable. It’s time for accountability.
Defend the Law and Defend the United States: No Deals With Terrorists
Mr. President,
You swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Unfortunately, you have disregarded the law to pursue a strategy of appeasement. You’re placing American security at risk, and you’ve betrayed our close ally Israel. Appeasement will not work. Uphold the law and make no deals with terrorist radicals.
(1)
(0)
PO2 Robert Cuminale
MCPO Roger Collins - I agree that this guy is a troll. He picks subjects sure to stimulate while adding nothing to them. He's been involved in a number of them and eventually gets beat up enough and stops posting until he comes up with a new subject.
(0)
(0)
PO2 Robert Cuminale
MCPO Roger Collins - I hadn't thought of that. He might be too squeamish for actual S&M.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
I am sorry, but I can not respond to this since I find it impossible to respond in a dignified way. I find very little this man has done that is good for this country.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I still cant get over the 'fact' that obama has been a successful president… I feel he set us back 30 with race issues and his constant assult on our constitutional rights makes him the worst president ive had to suffer through… im 48 so thats quite a few…. Last democratic president who was a patriot and a decent human being was jimmy carter. I dispute the 'fact' wholeheartedly. He is trying to get cops killed with his rhetoric and desperately trying to take away our constitutional rights to religion, free speech, and to bear arms…. Its time for a republican administration.
(1)
(0)
SrA Art Siatkowsky
Looking through the leftist rose colored glasses it might seem ludicrous but obama makes nixon looks like a saint…. Hell nixons crimes by comparison should mean hillary should be behind bars by now.. The dems today are pure evil if your a thiest and totaly communist if your not… the last dem who was a decent human being was jimmy carter but not a very good pres.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Most incompetent President ever. Most incompetent Commander in Chief ever. Most corrupt Administration ever.
(1)
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
Reagan administration scandals
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any US president.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals
Walt
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any US president.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals
Walt
Reagan administration scandals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any US president.[1]
(0)
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
I don't know of a single Obama appointment who was removed from office for improper behavior.
The reason the Rethugs keep talking up Benghazi is because they have nothing else to bitch about.
Walt
The reason the Rethugs keep talking up Benghazi is because they have nothing else to bitch about.
Walt
(0)
(0)
Capt Walter Miller
The most incompetent Commander in Chief is George Bush 43 in a walk.
FIASCO:
"The book alleges that the planning of the Iraq war was mismanaged by both the Bush administration as well as the U.S. Army. Ricks then goes on to outline the infighting between the senior policy advisers such as Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and the Army. Ricks includes quotes from former generals of the Iraq war, former Army generals, and several top level officials, both working for the Bush administration and Douglas Feith's planning contingent. Moving into the war, Ricks alleges various miscommunication and mismanagement of the Army's combat tactics as well as criticizing the overall strategy. Ricks also heavily criticizes the actions of L. Paul Bremer and explores his impact as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiasco_(book)
“President George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 ultimately may come to be seen as one of the most profligate actions in the history of American foreign policy,” Mr. Ricks writes. “The consequences of his choice won’t be clear for decades, but it already is abundantly apparent in mid-2006 that the U.S. government went to war in Iraq with scant solid international support and on the basis of incorrect information — about weapons of mass destruction and a supposed nexus between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda’s terrorism — and then occupied the country negligently. Thousands of U.S. troops and an untold number of Iraqis have died. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent, many of them squandered. Democracy may yet come to Iraq and the region, but so too may civil war or a regional conflagration, which in turn could lead to spiraling oil prices and a global economic shock.” -- NY Times
Walt
FIASCO:
"The book alleges that the planning of the Iraq war was mismanaged by both the Bush administration as well as the U.S. Army. Ricks then goes on to outline the infighting between the senior policy advisers such as Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld and the Army. Ricks includes quotes from former generals of the Iraq war, former Army generals, and several top level officials, both working for the Bush administration and Douglas Feith's planning contingent. Moving into the war, Ricks alleges various miscommunication and mismanagement of the Army's combat tactics as well as criticizing the overall strategy. Ricks also heavily criticizes the actions of L. Paul Bremer and explores his impact as head of the Coalition Provisional Authority."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiasco_(book)
“President George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 ultimately may come to be seen as one of the most profligate actions in the history of American foreign policy,” Mr. Ricks writes. “The consequences of his choice won’t be clear for decades, but it already is abundantly apparent in mid-2006 that the U.S. government went to war in Iraq with scant solid international support and on the basis of incorrect information — about weapons of mass destruction and a supposed nexus between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda’s terrorism — and then occupied the country negligently. Thousands of U.S. troops and an untold number of Iraqis have died. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent, many of them squandered. Democracy may yet come to Iraq and the region, but so too may civil war or a regional conflagration, which in turn could lead to spiraling oil prices and a global economic shock.” -- NY Times
Walt
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Hmmmm..... How many Constitutional violations has he done sir? To many for me to count. How often has he broken the law sir? Almost everyday. He acts like a dictator. If he can't push his agenda through Congress, he then legislates via Executive Order. He even said it himself. That entire statement is flawed and a joke sir.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
1
1
0
Obama Threatens To Veto Republican Bill That Would Undo Consumer Protections
President Obama is standing up for average Americans by threatening to veto a Republican bill that would undo important consumer protections.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
I know every toothpaste is recommended by 4 out of 5 dentists. It is all shaping facts how you want to and in other cases what you value more to determine if a person did good or not. Example in Seattle I believe it was raising minimum wage. Good if you got raise, bad if you had to lay off people as you could not afford as many employees or if you lost profit because of it.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google