Posted on Dec 27, 2013
When did the Army lose focus on personal responsibility?
5.98K
65
42
8
8
0
A comment in another thread sparked this discussion question.
Since when did we lose focus on accountability?
Some things are a leader responsibility. But the Army has become much like the rest of America: it's always someone else's fault.
Example: a Soldier fails his APFT or HTWT. They start blaming the SL. Even though the SL has told the Soldier you can't eat mcdonalds every day if the Soldier does it's still somehow the SLs fault.
A Soldier misses his medical appointment (this is huge where I'm at) and the PSGs gets a letter of concern.
A Soldier goes out and gets a DUI and they wanna know if your safety brief was good enough.
Sadly it extends to more important things like suicide.
What I mean by that is the Army has become a giant series of check the blocks to CYA. The moment someone is remotely upset we force them to go to the chaplain, MFLC, and a million other programs the Army has paid for rather than being 100% concerned about the problem. For example I'm ASIST T4T instructor. But if someone approached me with suicidal thoughts instead of fully talking to them as trained we take them to the million agencies to check the widgets first.
Don't take this as someone trying to shirk responsibility.
I'm just annoyed that the Soldier rarely gets fully blamed.
If a Soldier fails HTWT this is an individual responsibility. It shouldn't be the leaders fault that the Soldier eats like crap when they go home (assuming said leader has counseled them on proper eating and sent them to the nutritionist). Or if they fail the APFT it's suddenly the PSG fault even though the other 50 people passed.
The final straw was my objection to my PSGs getting LOC for their Soldier missing a medical appointment. I was told that it's the PSGs responsibility to ensure PFC Smith gets to medical. No. The Soldier made the appointment it's their job to get there. We are all adults. If we continue to treat Soldiers like children they will continue to act like children. The only exception would be if PSG Jones keeps PFC Smith at work and prevents him or her from going.
Thoughts?
Edited 11 y ago
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 15
10
10
0
The military went away from personal accountability and responsibility, when someone decided to micromanage leaders and blame them for the transgressions of their subordinates. When I came in the Army in the early 80's once you Graduated from IET you were an Individual and there was no more mass punishment, you screwed up you were held accountable and were punished you did it too many times you were chaptered. Today with the new crop of leaders soldiers are babied and leaders are held accountable when the babies screw up. I remember as a 1SG my CSM and BN commander were trying to hold me accountable for a soldier screw up and I flipped the scrip on them and told them seeing that you are trying to hold me accountable for an off duty off post incident. How about holding your self accountable also because you are in the chain of command and the soldier belongs to you also. That was the end of the conversation.
(10)
(0)
CSM Colin Patterson
Leaders need to realize that soldiers are humans and regardless of how much you counsel a soldier. If they choose to go out there and get in trouble there isn't anything anyone can do about it even if you are the greatest leader. Which is why I believe holding leaders accountable for soldiers behavior is a crock of shit. I have seen senior people get in trouble and have not seen their chain of command held responsible. Why have a double standard and only hold junior leaders or company level leaders accountable for the transgressions of their soldier. If we are going to hold leaders responsible lets do it across the board if not, lets put it back on the individual and hold them responsible.
(7)
(0)
CSM James Winslow
Exactly the way it should be. You cannot micromanage, control or regulate individual free will. You are a grownup now, with grownup responsibilities. You screw up, you pay the price. Get over it!
(5)
(0)
3
3
0
In my 20 plus years in uniform I have never arrested someone for DUI who said " if only I had attended that safety briefing". They are for CYA and everyone knows it. If you show up late for work it is no ones fault but your own. If you fail an APFT that's pathetic as it is, but failing tape is a individual responsibility. I don't care if you are overweight, the Army's weight standards don't account for weight lifters, instead we are all supposed to look like anorexics.
(3)
(0)
CSM Mike Maynard
There are not "weight standards", only "body fat" standards. The weights are screening tools to determine whether someone should be taped or not.
Not perfect, but I guarantee that the average BF of those under the screening weight is less than those over the screening weight and hence the reason for the screening weight.
(2)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
Correct, I just refer to them as standards because the Army stipulates a minimum and maximum.
(0)
(0)
CSM James Winslow
Speaking of standards, does anyone else thing it is strange that Someone in their 50's has to maintain the same weight standard as someone in their 40's? Between 28-39 we are authorized a 2% gain in BF. How about 40-55?
(0)
(0)
3
3
0
Another example. I had a SFC PSG before we deployed. I was a relatively new 1SG. This SFC couldn't even manage simple tasks or effectively manage his time. At all. I showed him how I stayed organized and I counseled him. After two months he just plain sucked.
It took every fiber of my being to get the BN to let me leave him behind (we had to cut some people anyhow).
I endured comments from other 1SG's about how this NCOs failures were probably a result of my lack of leadership. Wrong. You can only lead someone so far. Some people are never meant to lead a 30-40 person element. They just aren't organized.
If you show them organization melds and even recommend books on managing time and tasks and they still can't meet a single deadline that's not the leaders fault.
He has since cycled through about three or four positions and has been terrible at every one.
Some Soldiers just suck and are a product of over a decade at war and the war on numbers and I don't think any leader can necessarily fix stupid.
(3)
(0)
SFC (Join to see)
The question is did someone properly rate this incompetent NCO so that they are not competitive for promotion? That is a trend that happens far too often which is the reason we have so many piss poor senior NCOs.
(0)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
Yes, he was given a very bland 3/3 NCOER. Unfortunately I would have given him a RFC if I was his rater AND had been counseling him appropriately. Unfortunately I took over as 1SG in August 2012 and counseled him in October on paper with like ten other people present (it was that bad), but then that counseling was enough to get the BN to let me cut him from deployment. So he wasn't in my unit after that. His NCOER was definitely mediocre and in today's cuts he won't get picked up any time soon because of it - but it wasn't as bad as I wanted.
But then again I'm pretty harsh. I don't believe in rating someone as a "3" if they suck. Because "3" is a success.
(0)
(0)
CSM James Winslow
Some people can't get it if you paint it purple and tie it to their necks. Not all the right cups in the closet, or forks in the drawer. Call it what you want, but the Peter Principle applies to the Army, just as in every organization.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google