Posted on May 11, 2015
CH (MAJ) William Beaver
52.7K
347
196
16
16
0
Image
Image
What is the Navy's most lethal warship in today's fleet? The aircraft carrier? The submarine? Something else? What say you?
Posted in these groups: Navy NavyWeapons logo WeaponsFf98e4cc Submarines
Avatar feed
Responses: 103
Votes
  • Newest
  • Oldest
  • Votes
SPC Charles Brown
2
2
0
Edited 10 y ago
Which one has the most Marines on it? Whichever one that is is the most lethal. And this from an Army veteran. Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS & GySgt Wayne A. Ekblad , can you help me out here?
(2)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
Sgt Aaron Kennedy, MS
10 y
LHD easily. Wasp class (Wasp, Essex, etc). Holds 2k~ Marines. Essentially an ARG (3 ships) holds an entire MEU (BLT, Squadron+, Log Element, and MEU Command Element). The other two boats have "about" 1 Company each on them.

Marines are powerful in a "Plant the Flag" way. SSBNs are powerful in a "no one will be there when we Plant the Flag" way. They're incomparable assets, because they do two different things.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPO Information Systems Technician
CPO (Join to see)
10 y
The best marine is a submarine. SSBN = black-glass parking lots, while-u-wait, LOL!
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO2 Johnathan Kerns
PO2 Johnathan Kerns
10 y
Yup Chief lol
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO3 Mike Beachem
2
2
0
Submarine
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO2 Reed Armond
2
2
0
SSBN'S first and then the CVN's !!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Admin Alpo
2
2
0
Submarines, Navy policy sets the submarine program higher then any other surface ship and aviation program out there. The ability to strike with nuclear weapons inside any nations shores is almost impossible to defend against. Other forms of nuclear warfare can be intercepted or defended against with varying degrees of success, but the nuclear submarine being able to strike anywhere from the world can`t be defended against.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SCPO Ken Badoian
2
2
0
Love to say a surface ship but Ohio class SSBN's - 24 missiles with minimum 10 X megaton warheads per missile. A BIG bang for the buck. MMCS(SW)(SS) USN Ret.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SN Greg Wright
SN Greg Wright
10 y
24 missiles that are EACH capable of carrying 3-12 warheads.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MIDN LT Ex Navy Lt.
2
2
0
Breathless SSBN!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Jose Roman
2
2
0
SSGN packs a lot of extra punch besides the tomahawk armament, enough berthing for a SOTF, dry dock for an ADS and lockout chambers to put them on the beach.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Bryon Sergent
2
2
0
Well Chaplin, not in the Navy but would have to say the Aircraft Carrier. Reason being 84 ( or how ever many I don't know) F-18's, with all the ordinance that they carry holy crap Batman!
(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Bryon Sergent
SGT Bryon Sergent
10 y
So wouldn't the flex ability make it better then? Just asking sir?
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPO Emmett (Bud) Carpenter
CPO Emmett (Bud) Carpenter
10 y
Twenty-four years of experience in Naval Aviation taught me carriers are a lot harder to find then one would thank. It's a very big ocean and even with satellites there are ways to hide.
(1)
Reply
(0)
CPO Mike Anderson
CPO Mike Anderson
10 y
We rigged the carrier I was on to look like a merchant at night, a few times during exercises.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPO Information Systems Technician
CPO (Join to see)
10 y
Don't know how many times an SSBN has sent pictures of people smoking in the hangar bay to the CO of some CVN during an exercise, close enough to read their name tags, LOL! CVN's are awesome, but they look pretty small through a periscope, and they can't take out four countries at a time from anywhere on the planet.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Mark Strobl
2
2
0
Once again, demonstrating my bias: I'd say anything that starts with "L" --LPH, LHA, LPD, etc. These "gators" carry Marines. C'mon!
(2)
Comment
(0)
LCDR Graduate Student
LCDR (Join to see)
10 y
You're right and my bias in neutral working four carrier deployments and a couple SPMAGTFs. Regardless there's no reason to ignore the simple math. Setting aside ALL the air assets, trac barrels, weapons companies and a battalion's worth of crunchies lead absorption units, each big deck can deploy the 12 artie and tank tubes ready to give out some mad love. gives it around 2,000 pounds of heavy ordnance BOOM every minute - sustained. A carrier running cyclic ops has a throughput of AT BEST around 80 F/A-18s a day each for OTH strikes with around 8,000 pounds. That peaks out at just over 400 pounds a minute. Even if we throw SOPs and common sense out the window and loaded for bear against something a few miles from the CVN with zero air-to-air, we're still talking less than 1000 pounds a minute. Take all the stuff into account that I ignored before and there's no argument. Additionally, the CVN doesn't employ CAS control organically whereas the LHs carry over a hundred CAS-able troops ranging from 0369 all the way to the harbingers of death JTACs.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Rick Serviss
1
1
0
Great question. It used to be an Aegis Destroyer. I'm not sure now.
(1)
Comment
(0)
PO2 Mark Saffell
PO2 Mark Saffell
>1 y
Well Being a carrier sailor I have to vote an Aircraft Carrier, although the bubble heads will say a sub
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.