Posted on Sep 27, 2013
What's the most important thing the military should do while going through this downsizing period?
64K
1.87K
661
49
49
0
As the military enters a significant downsizing period, it's important to talk through relevant issues and solutions. Enter your response below, and if it gets the most Up votes, you win a free iPad Mini and we will personally deliver your thoughts to our Advisory Board, which includes retired Generals George Casey and Norton Schwartz, the recent Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force, respectively.<div><br></div><div>Tip: Get all your friends to vote Up your response by the end of the contest on Oct 7, 2013.</div>
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 502
Great question and one that should weigh heavy on every Commander's mind. I went through downsizing early in my career. Thankfully I de the cut. I never forgot how it felt to wonder if I would be let go. I say the most important thing would be: Is this decision for the good of the Army.
(2)
(0)
Fully understand the strategic impacts; 2nd and 3rd order effects by downsizing too fast, too soon in conjunction with on-going world-wide events and take into consideration as to critical MOSs required.
(2)
(0)
Leadership Development.
Not management training, not diversity training, not (fill in the blank) training...LEADERSHIP Training and Development. When the smoke clears and you see what the powers that be have left you with, you'd better be ready to develop and train what you've got. As Mr. Rumsfeld famously said, "You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you want." (or something close to that) What will ALWAYS win the war (and consequently, the peace), is the squad, the fire team, the individual Soldier carrying out his or her mission. Better have some folks able to motivate, inspire, train those troops.
Not management training, not diversity training, not (fill in the blank) training...LEADERSHIP Training and Development. When the smoke clears and you see what the powers that be have left you with, you'd better be ready to develop and train what you've got. As Mr. Rumsfeld famously said, "You go to war with the Army you have, not the Army you want." (or something close to that) What will ALWAYS win the war (and consequently, the peace), is the squad, the fire team, the individual Soldier carrying out his or her mission. Better have some folks able to motivate, inspire, train those troops.
(2)
(0)
I think they should discontinue the automatic promotions. I never supported this idea since its conception. All it does is allows those less than stellar Soldiers to simply wait things out (while staying out of trouble) until their time arrives, then they simply become less than stellar leaders. Promotions should be based off a Soldiers' past performance, appearance, attitude, proficiency and ability to adhere to the Army Values.
(2)
(0)
The military needs to look very cautiously at who they are getting rid of. I remember the last time we went through a large reduction in the early 1990s and unfortunately the good leaders got out and we were left with the inefficient ones who knew that they could not succeed in the outside world.
(2)
(0)
I feel that they should focus on the education of the "best and brightest" and really take a close hard look at the ones "who are here for the paycheck" . This would help with the downsizing issue and educate the force.
(2)
(0)
I'm with the good LT on the networking issues, but I'll go a step further. We need to seriously rethink the degree to which we depend upon networked computing. Much of our MC and Intel systemry now depends upon client-server systems that cannot exist while on the move (I firmly believe winT is a fairy tale until I see it functionally demonstrated while on the move). Map and acetate doesn't fail when the power goes out, you just get a flashlight. CPOF will not function without continuous, safe DC power. Many of our systems now cannot be used in a 'stand-alone' role, meaning it's a paperweight until the Taj Mahal TOC gets set up. Maneuver battalions, particularly Combined Arms Battalions, can move hundreds of kilometers a day under good conditions. No time to set up a TOC, they just roll. But then they can't get onto the CPOF BUB, so that BC would be in trouble. Got to slow down, set up the TOC for four or six hours so the boss can talk. Same thing with DCGS.
What the Army needs to do is seriously think about how to win the next conventional war. Where we can accept risk and where we can't. What the force structure of the brigade should look like for the future and what resources we can add to it to make it further self sufficient. That said, the brigade as it currently stands is a big beast and may need some reworking to better enable staffs to manage. Seven or more direct reporting units is beyond the Army standard 3-5, but we ask O6's to do that daily.
I propose we reorganize the brigade, reintroduce the regiment as a subordinate echelon, reorganize maneuver battalions under their regimental affiliations, and assign enablers to supporting regiments, placing the regiments, then, under a Brigadier as the brigade commander. And get back to using maps and acetate.
(2)
(0)
Always remember that EVERY Soldier is of value. Treat each one with respect and dignity and the transition will be much easier to cope with, the Services should not lose sight of that when downsizing. When a person feels valued they can usually cope much, MUCH better through the challenges of employment and relationships. A very good prescription for preventing depression and/or suicide among our troops.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next