Posted on Sep 27, 2013
CPT Aaron Kletzing
64.6K
1.87K
661
49
49
0
As the military enters a significant downsizing period, it's important to talk through relevant issues and solutions. &nbsp;Enter your response below, and if it gets the most Up votes, you win a free iPad Mini and we will personally deliver your thoughts to our Advisory Board, which includes retired Generals George Casey and Norton Schwartz, the recent Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force, respectively.<div><br></div><div>Tip: Get all your friends to vote Up your response by the end of the contest on Oct 7, 2013.</div>
Posted in these groups: 702767d5 Downsizing
Avatar feed
Responses: 502
SFC Charles Williamson
3
3
0
I think that they need to look at whats the most important factor here and that is not to push out all the experience because we are still envolved in conflicts all over. Let the experience people go would only make our troops more open to not getting the training they need to maintain on the battle field to bring them home safely
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Andres Zayas
3
3
0
Create a board of the best and brightest from every rank possible. Sit at a round table, where no one is at the head and all are participants and each member is equally empowered. Understand the current mission, create schedules and assign key members, within their respective specialty, to begin a system of eliminating excess and waist. Implement a hierarchy rule for each and every element that runs and supports the command. "can we do or do with out".  Do this for personnel and equipment. Within personnel, concentrate on career development. By the way the best equipment is the men and women. This is a well planned model. Keep it basic Folks!!! Navy (Res) E-6 and Police Sergeant.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Andres Zayas
3
3
0
Create a board of the best and brightest from every rank possible. Sit at a round table, where no one is at the head and all are participants and each member is equally empowered. Understand the current mission, create schedules and assign key members, within their respective specialty, to begin a system of eliminating excess and waist. Implement a hierarchy rule for each and every element that runs and supports the command. "can we do or do with out".  Do this for personnel and equipment. Within personnel, concentrate on career development. By the way the best equipment is the men and women. This is a well planned model. Keep it basic Folks!!! Navy (Res) E-6 and Police Sergeant.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PV2 Donald Maloy
3
3
0
The military needs to look at more than just a high P.T. score when decided who to put out during the downsizing. I was put out with a 220+ P.T. score, 3 different back conditions, and no benefits, yet everytime my NCO's needed something done, they came to me, the PV2, not the SPC's or the SPC-Promotables. I was contunously recommended for awards, but because my P.T. scores weren't high enough, I was never considered. It's not always about how fit the soldier is, it's about how dedicated they are to their work. 
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Platoon Sergeant
3
3
0
As the military downsizes, we must focus on the values that made us great. We are consistently asked to do the things that others won't or can't. As our numbers decrease, we can no longer rely on numbers to ensure the right Soldiers end up in key positions - positions that create success for the mission. We need to ensure the ones who are left are the highest moral character and skill to make the best out of what will undoubtedly be a difficult situation. We need to be who the nation needs us to be - Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen, Marines, and Coast Guardsmen of character - people in whom our nation can continue to be proud.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Cybersecurity
3
3
0

1. Bring back the SQT

2. Let those folks out that don't want to be in (appropriate reductions in benefits should be applied)

3. Performance Based Promotion Boards

4. All soldiers (officers/enlisted) should receive a Career Performace Chart that will indicate Career Achievement Goals, with each goal made up of subtasks based upon TIS and TIG, MOS, and SQI. Failure to meet or exceed those objectives should result in chapter proceedings.

4. Promote more Seconday MOSs so that soldiers can be reassigned to those positions when needed.

5. More Professional Development geared toward the younger NCOs that should include Financial Education, Person to Person Leadership, Anger Management, Small Task Success.

6. Not all solders are honest and retain the 3-hour moral and ethics class they are given in Basic Training. Soldiers should be exposed to moral and ethical situations more often so that they can conduct themselves accordingly. The concept of On the Spot Correction is almost non-existent these days.

7. Senior Leaders (First Sergeants, SGMs, CSMs) should interact directly with Junior NCOs (SGTs, SSGs) when executing Operations and Planning. SSG(P), SFCs, and MSGs should be there to help Guide there subordinates..learning by watching is not a great concept in the military, the more they realize that, the better leaders troops will become. 

8. Program utilization should be shared across all branches instead of a sepreate program for each service. Porgram interoperability is essential in cutting costs. This would eliminate excess contract jobs.

 

Plus more, but I have to get back to work. I will add some more later.

 

(3)
Comment
(0)
SGT Cybersecurity
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
I meant to type "their" subordinates, not there
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SSG James Lopez
3
3
0
Downsizing can be a good thing or a bad thing. I know with this new technology that is coming out, it is replacing soldiers, but what happens if our technology is wipe out etc., then we will regret not having enough troops etc! The government doesn't really care, it is all about saving the $$, but sometimes is it worth it? By downsizing, we are hurting families, economy in small towns etc. Remember our troops and their families! God Bless!
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Healthcare Specialist (Combat Medic)
3
3
0
Get rid of all the civilians and let the soldiers do their jobs. 
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPO Jon Campbell
3
3
0
Drawing down and tightening up after a war is something that the military has always had to do. Inter-war periods are an opportunity to kill off un needed and redundant programs and study the lessons learned. A tightened budget doesn't have to mean a loss of ability to carry out a mission. Many troops will tell you that a bloated structure is far worse than a lean, effective force. 
Listening to the troops about what is needed is vital to determining the needs of the military.
(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
COL Tom Miller
3
3
0

What is your response?

 



What’s the most important thing the military should do while
going through this downsizing period?



 



First and foremost, we have to recognize that what is
preserved in terms of the force and the associated capabilities will represent
our “start point” for the next major conflict. 
Miscalculations will directly translate into additional casualties and
ad hoc solutions during the early months and first years of this next period of
prolonged combat. 



Fundamental enablers, while not “sexy” to retain and
certainly a significant challenge to keep trained and ready are imperative
building blocks in the force we should retain.  Signal, Medical, Aviation and Intelligence individual,
collective skills along with the necessary force structure which ensure these
critical pieces are ready to deploy and support (fight) early are an absolute must have.  Significant investment dollars must continue
to be leveraged and spent to continue the processes to network the force on
tomorrow’s battlefield, treat and heal our warriors, move the force rapidly
across the space and enable decision dominance for leaders from the point of action
on the ground, to and through our leadership nodes in the fight all the way to
the White House. 



This line of thought represents a significant intellectual challenge
and directly runs counter to the Army’s “DNA” of retaining combat arms
formations in the active force.  Combined
arms maneuver is most certainly the key ingredient for success in a kinetic
fight and must at some level be retained. 
A point for thought, how many commanders since 9/11 have asked for more
killing power?  The fight has been and
will be a fight for information. 
Understanding the humans in the space will be the most important aspect
of all future fights.  Not many potential
adversaries, not any with direct understanding of what we did as we burst
across the Iraqi border in ’03 and marched to Baghdad, will risk their war
objectives on a “conventional” battlefield against the combined arms
capabilities of the air and ground forces we can put on the field. Accordingly,
a mix of enablers with a lethal but reduced active force of combat arms
formations supported by other formations in the Guard and Reserves represents
the new norm for how we mix our force across the Active, Guard and Reserve formations. 



Our most important “thing we must do:” is retain capable,
combat experienced junior leaders, present day senior 0-3s and junior 0-4s who
are deemed most likely to be tomorrows 0-5 and 0-6 level commanders and Flag
Officer primary staff officers.  They
must be incentivized to stay the course, remaining in a force that will for the
near term not look much like the force they joined, deployed with, and lead in
combat.  Many, if not all, will ask WHY
STAY?  Most of our very successful junior
leaders would be do well in any field of endeavor they pursue.  Too times today’s senior leaders are not
capable or not willing to provide a clear and concise (think precise) answer to
the question Why - as it is not politically correct and certainly not what many
young leaders and their spouse want to hear: 
the force will need you to be a key senior leader in the early period of
the next fight.  Your experiences and expertise
will reduce the number of KIA and WIA in that early period of major conflict.  Senior leaders must look them straight in the
face and tell them they understand they are asking everything of them – those nearly
10 years between senior Captain and LTC worst case (normal case for Army) equal
five Permanent changes of station: five new houses to set up and manage; for
the kids five new schools, 5 sets of friends lost, five new sets of friends to
make while seeing less and less of the service member as he or she takes on
more difficult and time consuming jobs. After those 10 years of sacrifice, the force
offers no guarantee of command or primary staff job that assures selection to
0-6.  This must be done.  It is possible.  History shows us that General Marshall with
others in fact accomplish this critical task as he moved through the pre-WWII
Army and once appointed Chief of Staff shaped the officer course who lead the
Army to victory in WWII.  A tough, very
tough sell to leaders and their families who know nothing but deployment and
conflict but the critical action we must successful undertake if we want to be successful
in the next significant fight. 

 



(3)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close