Posted on Sep 27, 2013
What's the most important thing the military should do while going through this downsizing period?
64K
1.87K
661
49
49
0
As the military enters a significant downsizing period, it's important to talk through relevant issues and solutions. Enter your response below, and if it gets the most Up votes, you win a free iPad Mini and we will personally deliver your thoughts to our Advisory Board, which includes retired Generals George Casey and Norton Schwartz, the recent Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force, respectively.<div><br></div><div>Tip: Get all your friends to vote Up your response by the end of the contest on Oct 7, 2013.</div>
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 502
The main focus should be on retaining quality personnel. To coincide with this, DOD must make an effort to ease the transition of chaptering unsatisfactory soldiers. By this, I mean, let's stop paying soldiers large amounts of severance pay for their inability to maintain the standard. This only burdens units and makes the chapter process not even worth it. Also, in order to retain the productive and contributing soldier, there must be some type of incentive program in the likes of reenlistment options. We as a military have fallen victim to what is known as Packards Law in which, there have been an outstanding amount of small bureaucratic red tape placed around our nco's, driving away the right type of leaders which then forces higher level leadership to promote the wrong people, in turn forcing more red tape to ensure they are properly doing their jobs and the cycle starts over. This cycle has left us in an endless state of mediocrity. Once we learn that micromanagement is the opposite of effective leadership, we may begin to dig ourselves out of this hole we are in.
(1)
(0)
The government has a bad habit of sticking round pegs in square holes and vice versa, the one action that in my opinion would gain the most positive response is simply prior to discharge, in the last six months or so, arrange for 3 correspondence courses for the service member in varied career fields, preferably in subjects of the service members choosing. Prior to discharge evaluate for reclassification based on performance. If the service member is retained, the service has significantly increased the members versatility, if not, the member has increased the chances of employment in a difficult economy. It's win-win. And it can help overcome bad career matches due to recruiting quotas.
(1)
(0)
Educating separating members on all benefits and entitlements. Using the VA, assisting with continued education, and building a competitive résumé to market themselves into civilian life are the top three things the army should focus on as many soldiers prepare for the downsize. With the oldies who will be staying in the service there should be an equal amount of information being shared as many programs that were available in the past will most likely be discontinued due to the downsizing.
(1)
(0)
I see all these responses saying "keep the best and cut the worst". Question becomes how do you identify those people? By NCOER/OER? Too many raters have the attitude that "if my subordinates get an 'among the best' rating, that means I get an 'among the best' too" or "This guy tries really hard, I don't want to ruin his career". Just going by ratings can be just as subjective as using PT scores or number and prominence of awards: different people will have different standards for all of those things.
How about we utilize the metric of those who can contribute the most to the mission? Not just the Soldiers who "do their job" but who seek out additional duties and skill sets, (i.e., Ranger, SF, jumpmaster, master gunner, etc) that make them more valuable members of their team/unit?
Or maybe trim some of the flag officer positions. The latest numbers I could find (April 2011) are that there are currently just shy of 1000 flag officers, for a total military force (all branches and components) of just over 3M SM, or one for every 3k SM. During WWII, there were a little over 1000 flag officers, for a total military force of over 13M SM, or one flag officer for every 13k SM. How many of those positions are duplicates? Could some of them be done jointly for all services, e.g., does each service need a separate procurement system, headed by a 4 star with all their attendant staff (i.e. 2 3-stars, 4 2-stars, 8 1-star, all their chiefs of staff and the staff itself, aides in the rank of captain through colonel whose main job seems to be to carry a bag full of coins, etc)?
(1)
(0)
SSG (Join to see)
SSG Stewart, the way forward may just be peer evaluations. The peers that you would choose for yourself, as well as the Service members that would be fair and impartial when evaluating another Soldier/Marine/Sailor, etc.
(1)
(0)
What is your response? We need to protect our troops and family while in unform or out of uniform
(1)
(0)
Teach those staying in how to advance in there JOB and there RANK.
Second those getting out show them how to get all transcripts of the experiences so they can better ready for the CIVILIAN Market.
(1)
(0)
Sir:
Be Fair and TRIM from the TOP and Bottom equally. Ensure QMP/QSP encompasses everyone and is used effectively.
Take this time to "re-energize" our military. In some ways we have become complacent with our military customs & courtesies. We've become relaxed with enforcement of regulations, and we've blurred the lines between being "friends" versus being leaders to an embarrassing degree.
Take this downsizing time to also hone in and perfect our younger Soldiers with great mentorship programs.
Thank you,
SSG Best
(1)
(0)
Read This Next