Posted on Sep 27, 2013
CPT Aaron Kletzing
63.5K
1.87K
661
49
49
0
As the military enters a significant downsizing period, it's important to talk through relevant issues and solutions. &nbsp;Enter your response below, and if it gets the most Up votes, you win a free iPad Mini and we will personally deliver your thoughts to our Advisory Board, which includes retired Generals George Casey and Norton Schwartz, the recent Chiefs of Staff of the Army and Air Force, respectively.<div><br></div><div>Tip: Get all your friends to vote Up your response by the end of the contest on Oct 7, 2013.</div>
Posted in these groups: 702767d5 Downsizing
Avatar feed
Responses: 502
SGM Steven Richards
2
2
0
First and foremost we need to ensure that our leaders have taken a hard look at what the right number is to ensure we can continue to meet our missions both OCONUS and abroad in the USA. Once that is identified it needs to be strategically messaged so the force understand, so Soldiers have no doubt what our end state is to be. Next leaders need to identify the proper levers to adjust to get us there. Whether it's through a decrease in accessions, early retirements and/or early outs and reclassifications for those over strength MOSs into shortage MOSs we need to ensure we are doing everything possible to keep our best qualified Soldiers. Lastly we need to make it easier for Brigade level leaders to put out substandard Soldiers in order to decrease our QSP numbers over the next three years. Also recommend constant and early messaging to Soldier and leaders in MOSs that need reclassification out of which will ensure Soldiers can get an early start with retention or possibly coded if they are ineligible for  reenlistment.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG John Mendyka
2
2
0
First and foremost retain the smartest not the strongest or most physically fit individuals.  Take physical fitness scores out of the equation.  Look at education and pertinent education.  Keep troops who have attained a degree from a truly accredited institution or are actually working on it, not just their PT score.  Next, conduct interviews from the top down.  Find folks with legitimate technical competency.  There is entirely too many folks who are not skilled technicians but space fillers who only look good on paper.  Commo guys who can't communicate, infantrymen who can't fight or logisticians who can't give troops beans and bullets.  Trim the fat and get those that can perform not just look good.  
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
GySgt (Other / Not listed)
2
2
0
The most important thing the military should do while going through this downsizing period is retaining it's combat experienced men!
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Behavioral Health Specialist
2
2
0

I would agree with eliminating some of those items.  I rarely go to the PX unless I have to go or unless I am looking at their clearance items.  I would like to see that go to contracting and have companies bid to provide these services to a captive audience.  It amazes me that I can go off base in some locations and get gas, haircuts and other items cheaper.  One example would be the barbershop, in the last year the cost of a haircut at my location went up 10%.  However, I did not receive a 10% pay raise.  When I asked about this I was told they do a survey of the surrounding area and keep the price within a percentage range of the average.  I do not really find that as an acceptable answer as elements on the installation do not have all of the same costs of doing business as off post businesses have.  The same applies to fuel!


I also think we could reevaluate all of our MWR activities and determine which activities are better managed by civilian elements.  For example, and this may not apply to all installations, I have been places where it costs more to bowl on base than it does off base. 


BLUF:  If there is a service on the installation that does not enhance the lives of our Soldiers and Families AND it is more costly than receiving that service off base, we need to evaluate whether or not we need to keep it.

(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Public Affairs Broadcast Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
I'm amazed to hear that our Outdoor Recreation trips often cost SIGNIFICANTLY more than if you took the trip on your own...
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Behavioral Health Specialist
2
2
0

I do not believe there is any one "most important thing".  Below are my top 6 (in no particular order):


1. I think we really need to assess what it is that we want from our Soldiers when we go to war.  If we are going to contract cooks, maintenance personnel and other positions, then we really do not need them in the Army.  I would start there. 


2. Reevaluate those tasks that we do in Garrison that do not support our combat mission.  If it does not bring value to the Army then we stop doing it.  No more pet projects.


3. Evaluate the like tasks that are accomplished across all branches of services.  Decide which branch would be best to manage those tasks and assign all those personnel to that branch for management.  (If medical is assumed by the Army then all medical personnel will belong to the Army; if all fight activities are assumed by the Air Force then transfer ALL those activities to the AF; if all HR activities are assumed by the Navy then all HR personnel would be assigned to the Navy).  The 2nd and 3rd order effects of this would amount to phenomenal savings to the DoD. (I could go way more in depth on this)


4. Consolidate installations across the DoD.  I have not seen any conflict that we have fought since Vietnam (and probably further back) that only involved one branch of the service.  There have been separate missions; however, those support the larger goal.  This way we are actually working with the other branches before we go to war (or peacekeeping missions). (I could expand on this as well)


5. Consolidate the entire education system in the DoD.  I am amazed at how fragmented we are across the board when it comes to education.  A simple restructure to mirror a University system would eliminate much of the redundancy that occurs across the branches.  This could be done just in the Army; however, the gains would be amazing if we incorporated the entire DoD.  Once again the 2nd and 3rd order effects would be unbelievable. 


6. Get out of the real estate business!  We started this when we privatized family housing, we need to take it one step further and privatize the barracks as well.

(2)
Comment
(0)
SGT Public Affairs Broadcast Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
11 y
... and the PX, and the Commissaries, and the Theaters, etc, etc, etc... 
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Founder/Senior Pastor
2
2
0
Edited 11 y ago
"What's the most important thing the military should do while going through this downsizing period?"......
Assess whether our nation has become arrogant in seeing the need to downsize our defense while China, Russia and other nations are building theirs up? I believe these other nations understand that a strong and powerful opponent is the greatest deterrent to outside threats. How long can a nation hold to the illusion of being a superpower with no manpower? We have become complacent in our defense approach only because most of the modern conflicts have been fought on foreign soil - not here.  All the while, other nations are busy stealing our secrets to create nukes and other weapons of mass destruction aimed at our demise. Our dependence on long-range weaponry in my opinion causes us to think less manpower is necessary. All the chiefs have to do is ask any giant in manufacturing if automation caused a decrease in personnel overhead. Most of the time they found that the more technology brought in, meant more manpower to repair them and figure out why the machines won't do what they were programmed to do. Sending people out the front door only to have to let them back in through the back door doesn't make sense. Technology alone does not win wars - trained, prepared men and women do. If a war being fought on American soil were a real concern to top brass,
I think their planning and Homeland Security objectives would be
completely different.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW5 Sam R. Baker
2
2
0
Absolutely retain quality servicemembers of all ranks that take their duty seriously and exemplify the qualities and professionalism that serving our country deserves. We need honest assessments on evaluations and boards that not only promote, but serve as quality control points for careers. Everyone has seen someone advance of clearly negative performance or character and often ask why or how? It is the paper and we as leaders must take the hard right over the easy pass to avoid conflict. Being straight with a subpar performer is our responsibility as leaders and mentors, if we don't act, then great leaders and followers will leave or be forced out to keep some less than desirables who will stay knowing that the civilian sector will equally not let them advance. Again, retain quality, recognize them public ally and counsel those who need to step up or move out of our services to make room for those who serve so honorably.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Clarence Zarnes
2
2
0
Properly prepare our Service Members for Civilian Employment. ACAP and TAP are not enough. They need to be educated/trained on the necessary Degrees and Certifications to help them be successful in the civilian sector. Experience and Attitude are not enough.
(2)
Comment
(0)
SSG Mike Angelo
SSG Mike Angelo
>1 y
SGM. If the DoD would spend equal amount of time with recruitment and retention versus processing out...inflows and outflows then maybe those moving forward into civilian world would be more competitive. 

For example, officer tracts are wired for accredited university and college degrees/certs and advance degrees, masters and doctorate levels. Enlisted tracts are not so wired. Correspondent courses are not university accredited; in-service training only. 

Now what I have seen is SM's in mid career in online colleges for AA, BS and MS degree programs. I had an AF MSG in my doctoral class a few years back. Bottom line is that enlisted are heavily relying on their own resources for a competitive advantage in the civilian workforce. 


(1)
Reply
(0)
SGM Clarence Zarnes
SGM Clarence Zarnes
>1 y

SSG A, You have hit the nail on the head!  As Enlisted (NCOs) Service Members we are considered the Back Bone of the Service, but yet there is little consideration or recognition for that work once we leave the Service.  At a minimum we (Enlisted) need a military career tract similar to the Officer Corps.


Thanks, Clarence


 

(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Phillip L.
2
2
0
Don't get injured. Keep your PT scores up and your nose clean. Be flexible for cross-training and assignments. Remember, it's just a phase. Soon they'll be handing out bonuses and begging again. Probably quite soon. Boost your civilian education just as much, if not more, than your military education. The new military likes educated soldiers.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Station Commander
2
2
0

Not give all recruiters new Android Galaxy S4 phones with unlimited data text and minutes.... Not the best way to blow a broken budget.

 

(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close