What do you think of Personal Nuclear Devices

<div>Gentlemen,</div><div><br></div>The Davy Crockett contained a W54 compact very low yield plutonium implosion type device to be launched from either a 120-millimeter (XM-28) or 155-millimeter (XM-29) recoilless rifle. It had a range of 1.24 miles (120 millimeter) to 2.49 miles (155 millimeter). The SADM contains a minor variant of the W54 tactical nuclear warhead.<div><br></div><div>As proven in field trials, with proper planning the crews detonating these devices could be protected. &nbsp;However, when deployed in the Korean conflict to interdict troops coming south through the mountain passes, southerly winds definitely concerned enlisted men assigned to these crew served devices. &nbsp;However, security was provided by a simple combination lock.<div><br></div><div>Some parties, including President Kennedy, felt the design of these devices intended to be transported, secured, and launched by enlisted personnel represented a serious breach of the doctrine of positive control over nuclear weapons by the national command authority.</div></div><div><br></div><div>Still, from a nursing perspective, we took an awful risk deploying personal nuclear devices.</div><div><br></div><div><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Tahoma; color: #444444">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W54</p>
<p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Tahoma; color: #444444">http://www.militaryfactory.com/smallarms/detail.asp?smallarms_id=570</p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Tahoma; color: #444444">http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html<br></p><p style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Tahoma; color: #444444"><br></p></div><div class="pta-link-card"><div class="pta-link-card-picture"><img src="http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Home.gif"></div><div class="pta-link-card-content"><div class="pta-link-card-title"><a target="_blank" href="http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/Allbombs.html">List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons</a></div><div class="pta-link-card-description">Principal Sources:Swords of Armageddon by Chuck Hansen, 1995U.S. Nuclear Weapons: The Secret History by Chuck Hansen, 1988Nuclear Weapons Databook: U.S. Nuclear Forces and Capabilities by Thomas B. Co...</div></div><div style="clear:both"></div><div class="pta-box-hide"><i class="icon-remove"></i></div></div>

<p>The biggest problem with entertaining the idea of 'small' tactical nukes - is that it would not stay at that level.&nbsp; Escalation from its use on either side of the conflict would most likely lead us down the road that no one in their right mind wants to travel.&nbsp; Also, if you look at some of this issues we've had with our own nukes through the years - I don't think having smaller ones that are even easier to 'misplace' is such a good thing to comtemplate.&nbsp; </p><p>Our long time 'cold war' nemesis has had got a lot of trouble just keeping track of their big stuff and the items to make them.&nbsp; The 'genie' needs to be kept where it belongs - under constant surveillance and locked down.&nbsp; Having small nukes around will create a nightmare that is better left to sfi-fi writers then for us to actually experience.</p><p>There are plenty of 'non-nuke' items that work just as well without&nbsp;the mess or ramifications from its use.</p><p>Back in the cold war times - if our tactical nukes were&nbsp;going to be over run - they would fire them at the attackers (so they could'nt be used against us).&nbsp; This would have started the escalation of nuclear exchange on both sides and spill over to other countries that had nukes that were going to be affected would have launched theirs as well - it's just a very bad scenario that should never came off the drawing boards.</p><p>Fast forward to todays situation with all of the different factions trying to via for their right to push their political/religious points of view on anyone that does not entertain them and you have a recipe for extreme disaster on a global scale.&nbsp;</p>

You guys didn't get one of these in your initial issue?&nbsp; You know they're going to ask for it back when you separate....