Posted on Jun 16, 2015
Sikh Wins Court Case To Join ROTC: Is this a victory for religious freedom or did the court go too far?
280K
1.82K
762
33
32
1
A Federal Judge has ruled that Iknoor Singh's adherence to his Sikh faith - wearing facial hair, keeping his hair long, but wrapped in a turban, and carrying a sharp knife on his person - would not diminish his capacity to serve the nation he loves, the United States of America, as a future Officer in the United States Army. Do you feel too many allowances are being made for his faith or do you feel he should be welcomed into the ranks if he can successfully fulfill the requirements for Commissioning? What say you, RP?
--
(Note: Full article added by RP Staff.)
MINEOLA, NY — A Sikh college student from New York said Monday he is excited about a federal court decision that will permit him to enroll in the U.S. Army's Reserve Officer Training Corps without shaving his beard, cutting his hair, or removing his turban.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the ruling Friday in Washington, D.C., saying 20-year-old Iknoor Singh's adherence to his religious beliefs would not diminish his ability to serve in the military.
"I didn't believe it at first when I heard about the decision," said Singh, who lives in the New York City borough of Queens.
He told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Monday: "It was kind of surreal. This is something I have been fighting for for two or three years. I'm excited and nervous; very excited to learn."
Singh, who will be a junior next fall studying finance and business analytics at Hofstra University on Long Island, said he has had a lifelong interest in public service. He speaks four languages — English, Punjabi, Hindi, and Urdu — and he said he wants to work in military intelligence.
"Becoming an officer is not an easy thing," he conceded. "You have to be proficient in many areas."
Sikhism, a 500-year-old religion founded in India, requires its male followers to wear a turban and beard and keep their hair uncut.
Under a policy announced last year, troops can seek waivers on a case-by-case basis to wear religious clothing, seek prayer time or engage in religious practices. Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military readiness or the mission.
Currently, only a few Sikhs serve in the U.S. Army who have been granted religious accommodations.
In her ruling, Jackson said, "It is difficult to see how accommodating plaintiff's religious exercise would do greater damage to the Army's compelling interests in uniformity, discipline, credibility, unit cohesion, and training than the tens of thousands of medical shaving profiles the Army has already granted."
Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Ben Garrett, said in a statement the decision is currently being examined. "The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin," he said.
Hofstra spokeswoman Karla Schuster said in a statement that the university "supports Mr. Singh's desire to serve his country, as well as his right to religious expression and practice. We are pleased that the courts have affirmed that he can do both as a member of the ROTC."
Gurjot Kaur, senior staff attorney for the Sikh Coalition, said the decision was "an important victory in the fight for religious freedom. We urge the Pentagon to eliminate the discriminatory loopholes in its policies and give all Americans an equal opportunity to serve in our nation's armed forces."
The American Civil Liberties Union and a group called United Sikhs jointly represented Singh in the case.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/sikh-student-queens-clear-join-army-rotc-article-1.2259423
--
(Note: Full article added by RP Staff.)
MINEOLA, NY — A Sikh college student from New York said Monday he is excited about a federal court decision that will permit him to enroll in the U.S. Army's Reserve Officer Training Corps without shaving his beard, cutting his hair, or removing his turban.
U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the ruling Friday in Washington, D.C., saying 20-year-old Iknoor Singh's adherence to his religious beliefs would not diminish his ability to serve in the military.
"I didn't believe it at first when I heard about the decision," said Singh, who lives in the New York City borough of Queens.
He told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Monday: "It was kind of surreal. This is something I have been fighting for for two or three years. I'm excited and nervous; very excited to learn."
Singh, who will be a junior next fall studying finance and business analytics at Hofstra University on Long Island, said he has had a lifelong interest in public service. He speaks four languages — English, Punjabi, Hindi, and Urdu — and he said he wants to work in military intelligence.
"Becoming an officer is not an easy thing," he conceded. "You have to be proficient in many areas."
Sikhism, a 500-year-old religion founded in India, requires its male followers to wear a turban and beard and keep their hair uncut.
Under a policy announced last year, troops can seek waivers on a case-by-case basis to wear religious clothing, seek prayer time or engage in religious practices. Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military readiness or the mission.
Currently, only a few Sikhs serve in the U.S. Army who have been granted religious accommodations.
In her ruling, Jackson said, "It is difficult to see how accommodating plaintiff's religious exercise would do greater damage to the Army's compelling interests in uniformity, discipline, credibility, unit cohesion, and training than the tens of thousands of medical shaving profiles the Army has already granted."
Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Ben Garrett, said in a statement the decision is currently being examined. "The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin," he said.
Hofstra spokeswoman Karla Schuster said in a statement that the university "supports Mr. Singh's desire to serve his country, as well as his right to religious expression and practice. We are pleased that the courts have affirmed that he can do both as a member of the ROTC."
Gurjot Kaur, senior staff attorney for the Sikh Coalition, said the decision was "an important victory in the fight for religious freedom. We urge the Pentagon to eliminate the discriminatory loopholes in its policies and give all Americans an equal opportunity to serve in our nation's armed forces."
The American Civil Liberties Union and a group called United Sikhs jointly represented Singh in the case.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/sikh-student-queens-clear-join-army-rotc-article-1.2259423
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 279
Personally I don't think it is appropriate. He is going to benefit from serving, but can't perform the same as everyone else, such as wearing a gas mask.
(0)
(0)
7 Sep 2012 ... US military judge orders forced shaving of Nidal Hasan, ruling his beard is not covered by laws protecting religious freedom.
This Judge was removed from the trial. So much for regulations, although he did have the pleasure of having a forced shaving. The NYPD was monitoring Islamic Religious Services and found many of them to be a hot bed of Anti American preaching. This was stopped by Mayor deBlosio, as profiling.
This Judge was removed from the trial. So much for regulations, although he did have the pleasure of having a forced shaving. The NYPD was monitoring Islamic Religious Services and found many of them to be a hot bed of Anti American preaching. This was stopped by Mayor deBlosio, as profiling.
(0)
(0)
I thought this was settled 30+ years ago, when Sikh's were allowed to wear their turbans while serving. Sikhs are, traditionally , great soldiers and have served with great honor.
(0)
(0)
Oh, I guess the subject was roses! Any way, does any one out there remember a fellow soldier? who worked as a clerk at The Ferris Barracks, Erlangen, (then) West Germany Main Post Office circa 1971. He was a member of a certain Native American Tribe and had quite long hair. OK, I know there is gas mask fitting problems and due to the chaos of combat, it is wise to have every body, on your side, to have the same uniform. But, really I'm curious about him and what bearing and/or situation he may have had on this case?
(0)
(0)
This may seem right to many, I look forward to seeing the results. But I think it goes a bit far, even though the exception is on a basis of religious beliefs. How will he manage to keep his hair clean and how much of an issue will facial hair cause for a gas mask? I don't remember the regulations around knives but I suspect they call for a folding knife less than 3 & 1/2's closed and what he is carrying a permanently open blade in a sheath.
Will his turban qualify as a cover and wouldn't it need to be camouflage in order to blend in with his surroundings?
We all know the rules of warfare and that a wounded soldier takes 2 other men/women to carry him/her which drastically reduces the efficiency of a small squad. A leaky gas mask will cause any Sikh to be incapacitated.
Maybe in the Air Force or Navy but not in the Army or God Forbid, the U.S.M.C. !
Will his turban qualify as a cover and wouldn't it need to be camouflage in order to blend in with his surroundings?
We all know the rules of warfare and that a wounded soldier takes 2 other men/women to carry him/her which drastically reduces the efficiency of a small squad. A leaky gas mask will cause any Sikh to be incapacitated.
Maybe in the Air Force or Navy but not in the Army or God Forbid, the U.S.M.C. !
(0)
(0)
During any field training, hygene is going to be a problem. Is he going to get a kevlar cover for his turban?
Seriously. It is an ALL volunteer force. Make him comply with the regs or boot his butt out.
Seriously. It is an ALL volunteer force. Make him comply with the regs or boot his butt out.
(0)
(0)
I am a retired veteran and I can not fathom how any one could possibly coocieve in their farthest stretch of imagination how anyone could allow someone to challenge and overcome the discipline of our military. This indiividual is a human being and there is nothing about his religion which can assure anyone that he will not one day decide to use that weapon to settle an argument or forcibly expresws his views. Members of our military have trained, fought and died to preserve our liberty. The US military has certain rules which should not be ignored becauuse this individual wants to join our military, if he will be allowed to preserve certain rules of his religion. His religion should not be allowed to dictate to us. I was a drill sergeant at one time, and I can see some problems with a drill sergeant trying to train an armed recruit, with several hair violations. This entire idea is ludicrous. If tis person is allowed to proceed, I believe many other recruits will file petitions for what they believe is right.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next