Posted on Jun 16, 2015
MAJ Senior Observer   Controller/Trainer
279K
1.82K
774
33
32
1
Iknoor singh 600x400
A Federal Judge has ruled that Iknoor Singh's adherence to his Sikh faith - wearing facial hair, keeping his hair long, but wrapped in a turban, and carrying a sharp knife on his person - would not diminish his capacity to serve the nation he loves, the United States of America, as a future Officer in the United States Army. Do you feel too many allowances are being made for his faith or do you feel he should be welcomed into the ranks if he can successfully fulfill the requirements for Commissioning? What say you, RP?
--
(Note: Full article added by RP Staff.)

MINEOLA, NY — A Sikh college student from New York said Monday he is excited about a federal court decision that will permit him to enroll in the U.S. Army's Reserve Officer Training Corps without shaving his beard, cutting his hair, or removing his turban.

U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson issued the ruling Friday in Washington, D.C., saying 20-year-old Iknoor Singh's adherence to his religious beliefs would not diminish his ability to serve in the military.

"I didn't believe it at first when I heard about the decision," said Singh, who lives in the New York City borough of Queens.

He told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Monday: "It was kind of surreal. This is something I have been fighting for for two or three years. I'm excited and nervous; very excited to learn."

Singh, who will be a junior next fall studying finance and business analytics at Hofstra University on Long Island, said he has had a lifelong interest in public service. He speaks four languages — English, Punjabi, Hindi, and Urdu — and he said he wants to work in military intelligence.

"Becoming an officer is not an easy thing," he conceded. "You have to be proficient in many areas."

Sikhism, a 500-year-old religion founded in India, requires its male followers to wear a turban and beard and keep their hair uncut.

Under a policy announced last year, troops can seek waivers on a case-by-case basis to wear religious clothing, seek prayer time or engage in religious practices. Approval depends on where the service member is stationed and whether the change would affect military readiness or the mission.

Currently, only a few Sikhs serve in the U.S. Army who have been granted religious accommodations.

In her ruling, Jackson said, "It is difficult to see how accommodating plaintiff's religious exercise would do greater damage to the Army's compelling interests in uniformity, discipline, credibility, unit cohesion, and training than the tens of thousands of medical shaving profiles the Army has already granted."

Army spokesman, Lt. Col. Ben Garrett, said in a statement the decision is currently being examined. "The Army takes pride in sustaining a culture where all personnel are treated with dignity and respect and not discriminated against based on race, color, religion, gender and national origin," he said.

Hofstra spokeswoman Karla Schuster said in a statement that the university "supports Mr. Singh's desire to serve his country, as well as his right to religious expression and practice. We are pleased that the courts have affirmed that he can do both as a member of the ROTC."

Gurjot Kaur, senior staff attorney for the Sikh Coalition, said the decision was "an important victory in the fight for religious freedom. We urge the Pentagon to eliminate the discriminatory loopholes in its policies and give all Americans an equal opportunity to serve in our nation's armed forces."

The American Civil Liberties Union and a group called United Sikhs jointly represented Singh in the case.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/queens/sikh-student-queens-clear-join-army-rotc-article-1.2259423
Posted in these groups: World religions 2 ReligionThcapm08l9 ROTCDiversity Diversity
Avatar feed
See Results
Responses: 282
SFC Jeff L.
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
meh
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MSgt Paul Anderson
0
0
0
During any field training, hygene is going to be a problem. Is he going to get a kevlar cover for his turban?
Seriously. It is an ALL volunteer force. Make him comply with the regs or boot his butt out.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW3 Arthur Petty
0
0
0
I am a retired veteran and I can not fathom how any one could possibly coocieve in their farthest stretch of imagination how anyone could allow someone to challenge and overcome the discipline of our military. This indiividual is a human being and there is nothing about his religion which can assure anyone that he will not one day decide to use that weapon to settle an argument or forcibly expresws his views. Members of our military have trained, fought and died to preserve our liberty. The US military has certain rules which should not be ignored becauuse this individual wants to join our military, if he will be allowed to preserve certain rules of his religion. His religion should not be allowed to dictate to us. I was a drill sergeant at one time, and I can see some problems with a drill sergeant trying to train an armed recruit, with several hair violations. This entire idea is ludicrous. If tis person is allowed to proceed, I believe many other recruits will file petitions for what they believe is right.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Signal Support Systems Specialist
0
0
0
COL Charles Williams

2. The religious headgear is of a style and size that can be completely covered by standard military headgear.

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

6. Religious headgear will not be worn in place of military headgear under circumstances when the wear of military headgear is required (for example, when the Soldier is outside or required to wear headgear indoors for a special
purpose).

I mean, there lies the answer, right?? Just like some unfortunates want to re-write the Constitution to meet their needs... lets re-write 670-1
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT Signal Support Systems Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
See, Lt Col (Join to see) the way his beard was, just too much. How can you fit a gas mask? I understand a beard, but it should still be in regulations to what type of facial hair you are allowed so you can get that seal. As far as the turban......................Moms always said if I can't say anything nice, not to say anything at all. Take the fifth.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Lt Col Instructor Navigator
Lt Col (Join to see)
>1 y
30bbbb64
F2e1b113
Well, it would be a real shame if we deployed people who couldn't get a seal on a gas mask.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Signal Support Systems Specialist
SGT (Join to see)
>1 y
Is That SF?? Cause they are different kinda breed there. Nothing can stop them.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
TSgt Steven Van Dyken
0
0
0
This is ridiculous. Almost every individual in the military has given up something important to them in order to assimilate. The military has no desire to keep this individual from practicing his faith, but why can't he do that while confirming to military standards? The regulations are in place for a reason, and everyone must have the same standard.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Frank Rinchich
0
0
0
This is BS, we are giving our country away bit by bit might as well give the military away also. When I was active we had our religious faith stamped on our dog tag, that's enough religious freedom in the military. We are a fighting , killing machine. not there to save souls.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Sgt Frank Rinchich
Sgt Frank Rinchich
>1 y
The court went to far, if it stays in the ROTC I could go for it but . the courts has no business making rules for our military , leave that up to our military leaders that know best. Our tradition has been a clean look sharp military, need to keep it that way. Our country is run now by political correctness , now the WH wants to start on our military. as I said in my last post on this , it's BS. give in to the minority and political correctness.
and we will end up like the military of a few countries that turn tail and run. The Sikh may be great fighters , and we would be proud to have them in our military. but if they want to be part of a US military rather then their own then they have to be willing to follow our rules and regulations.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Human Resources Specialist
0
0
0
2b7859c0
And yet this is still banned
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Human Resources Specialist
0
0
0
I think they blended the rules a lot on this one many people have religious believes that say they should be able to wear dreds and that's still band to this day
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Ward Taber
0
0
0
I have no problem with him being part of the military but he should be held to the SAME standards and dress codes as everyone else.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt W Hibshman
0
0
0
The Sikh student is asking to be allowed to participate in an Officer Candidate program which would prepare him to "possibly" be commissioned. ROTC members are not active duty; merely candidates. If there are other Sikh serving on active duty, then the Armed Forces have already vetted the issue and this decision must pertain specifically to the ROTC. An example of the dragon outrunning its' tail.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Sgt W Hibshman
Sgt W Hibshman
>1 y
Personally, I believe the uniform should be wore strictly by the Uniform Code no exceptions. If someone wishes to serve then they should be willing to set aside their religious requirement while in uniform. If their religion does not permit that then they may choose to serve this nation in a civilian capacity. But, that is only an opinion. Obviously, the military leadership does not agree.
(0)
Reply
(0)
CPT Quentin von Éfáns-Taráfdar
CPT Quentin von Éfáns-Taráfdar
>1 y
The taxpayer is paying for the ROTC. It is waste of funds to pay for someone who "may" be commissioned who clearly is not a team player.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Sgt W Hibshman
Sgt W Hibshman
>1 y
229f6f7a
That is true it is a waste of money. But, apparently the armed services have already decided the issue. There currently are several Sikh adherents in the US Army. I guess I'm confused why ROTC would have a stricter standard than active duty.
(1)
Reply
(0)
MAJ David White
MAJ David White
9 y
my first encounter with a Sikh in uniform was in 1998 when I met a radiologist in the base hospital wearing a turban. I heard that he knew his field, though and that covered the medical end of it. I wondered about the turban vis-à-vis donning a promask, as he also had a beard.... I've raised that issue before and folks have vouched that they've seen Sikhs "don and clear" within the standard. Good evidence can/did convince me he can serve. AS he serves, and others of his faith, we all can see that they "buy in" to the whole democracy/republic concept. I'm happy with that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close