Posted on Jul 12, 2015
CH (MAJ) William Beaver
13.5K
192
105
23
23
0
42edc931
I have a proposal for term limits for all three federal branches. But does anyone beside me think we need term limits for all branches?

Here's my proposal:

President and VP: no re-election. Simply one 6-year term. Election held every six years (starting 2016).

Supreme Court: Still appointed and confirmed, but get one 10 year term.

Senate: One 6 year term. Half elected same year as President (2016) and other half 3 years later (2019).

Representatives: One 4 year term. 1/3 of House elected every 3 years (2016, 2019, 2022).

Congress and President can run for re-election and serve ONE MORE TERM, but must stay out of the office for one full term between occupying any federal office.

Sample election cycle:
2016: President, Senate 1, House 1
2019: Senate 2, House 2
2022: President, Senate 1, House 3
2025: Senate 2, House 1
2028: President, Senate 1, House 2
2031: Senate 1, House 3
....and so on.

What do you think?
Avatar feed
Responses: 51
SFC Operations Nco
0
0
0
Two terms for anything above city level.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SFC Operations Nco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
It is a lot harder for a mayor to hide his/her screw ups, or corrupt activities than it is for someone higher than that. The general population pays attention at the local level, but the further it gets from home, the less they give a damn. It is a lot easier to remove a mayor from office via traditional means or through courts than it is higher than that.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SFC Operations Nco
SFC (Join to see)
>1 y
Your points are valid, sir. After additional thought I realize that my logic in this case doesn't hold any more water than a colander does. I am from Seattle, where corrupt politicians at the county level and bellow usually get stepped on at the ballot box most effectively.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close