Posted on Jan 21, 2014
SSG Robert Burns
4K
49
20
7
7
0
I'm sure everyone has heard about the terroristic threats for the upcoming Winter Games in Russia.  When there is such an immanent threat such as these, should we send our athletes over with the protection of our military?  Much like our dignitaries?  
They are representative of our Country and in the event of their harm or capture we would be reacting anyway with possible military force.  Why not an ounce of precaution?
Posted in these groups: Olympics logo Olympics
Avatar feed
Responses: 16
CPT Assistant Professor Of Military Science
4
4
0
A lot of good responses below.&nbsp; BLUF: Not our job, not our jurisdiction, potential diplomatic nightmare.<br>
(4)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Operations (S3)
MAJ (Join to see)
11 y
Exactly! It sounds good to say but you're spot on. 
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Executive Officer
4
4
0
SSG Burns,

Should the US protect our athletes? Absolutely. 


Should the military protect our athletes? I do not think so.



There are many ways to protect people, and I believe the lack of incidents at the Olympic Games shows that our nation and the host nations have done a fairly good job of protecting the competitors. 



I believe that having military force with our athletes would be a mistake and could potentially bring about more issues. If we did bring military forces to protect our troops, other countries would likely do the same and by the end of it your will have hundreds of countries militarized (many of whom do not agree with each other) in a small area.  I believe that is a recipe for disaster. 



 

(4)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1SG(P) First Sergeant
3
3
0
This isn't going to happen.&nbsp; But I'll play along since it's a good exercise in deployment considerations.&nbsp; You have good intent, but it's not well thought out.&nbsp; What's your plan when the Russians say, "Pound sand, you have no legal grounds to send troops here."&nbsp; They'd have every right to do that.&nbsp; Furthermore, they'd be right since such a suggestion I believe is unprecedented.&nbsp; In a sovereign country whose government we recognize, we'd still have to get their permission to send soldiers, especially if they're armed.&nbsp; And there's no SOFA I'm aware of.&nbsp; So that'll get sticky if a US soldier shoots someone.<br>
(3)
Comment
(0)
1SG(P) First Sergeant
1SG(P) (Join to see)
11 y
I've no doubt there's a robust NEO plan in place.  We just won't see it.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close