Posted on Jul 21, 2015
SCPO David Lockwood
5.43K
60
34
5
5
0
Edited >1 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 16
Capt Seid Waddell
5
5
0
Too bad they had to be shamed into taking this action.
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Kristin Wiley
5
5
0
Why did it take so long? And why isn't our President leading the way by taking the appropriate action immediately?
(5)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
1LT William Clardy
4
4
0
SCPO David Lockwood, I object to calling the casualties victims. Victims are generally helpless, these were military personnel who came under hostile fire.
(4)
Comment
(0)
1SG Military Police
1SG (Join to see)
>1 y
1LT William Clardy while I support your right to your objection, Webster's defines a victim as: a person who has been attacked, injured, robbed, or killed by someone else. Whether in a civilian law enforcement uniform or a military uniform, I wouldn't like to be thought of as a victim but it is the reality of it...especially given these particular service members were not afforded the opportunity to defend themselves.
(1)
Reply
(0)
1LT William Clardy
1LT William Clardy
>1 y
1SG (Join to see), there is some (admittedly still inconclusive) evidence that at least one of the Marines may have returned fire, albeit with a personal weapon instead of an issue one.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/marine-in-chattanooga-shooting-might-have-been-armed-officials-say/2015/07/20/1787a027-bbc4-429b-a8cc-9730d73b96a4_story.html
(2)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close