Military life compared to socialism

There have been many comparisons of military life to a socialism existence.

I am strictly conservative and find this subject distasteful, however, I bring it up to see how everyone else has responded to this argument. A large majority of military members run the conservative gamut, and therefore are largely anti-socialism.
However, we have seen many changes in the last decade thst appear to be taking this great country down a very govt-dependent path.

In a Socialism model, there is no difference in class, we are all equals, and none do without. Education, Health, Housing is all paid for...this is one of the arguments about the eerily similarities of military life and socialism.

2 million men and women wake up at approximately the same time.
They all wear the same uniform.
They all March to the same drum or cadence, even singing songs.
Their housing is taken care of and communal living is commonplace. When communal living is not provided, private housing is subsidized. Food is provided. Everyone is paid according to their rank, not merit. (Merit comes in later, of course)
Free healthcare is provided, often times for life.
There is little difference in lifestyle between troops, they can pretty much live as equals, none richer than the other.
We contribute $1200 to the MGIB, and get back $90k+. That is a free education no matter how you look at it.
The Differences:
It is a volunteer force until you sign the document, then and only then you are forced...or in a contract.
There is a merit based system, so one can advance.
The poorest soldier can, over time, make it from the stock room to the boardroom (figuratively speaking), and eventually become a General Officer.

When this topic is broached with your peers or liberal family member, how do you handle it?
Do you agree about the eery similarities?
Does it kind of create a paradox with your conservative ideals?