Posted on Nov 19, 2014
Military court weighing fate of condemned soldier. What Are Your Thoughts?
394K
3.4K
1.23K
80
79
1
From: Army Times
A former U.S. soldier sentenced to death for killing two fellow soldiers and injuring 14 others in an attack in Kuwait is pinning his hopes of staying alive on an argument jurors should have never seen his diary.
Attorneys for 43-year-old Hasan K. Akbar argued on Tuesday that the one-time sergeant's writings, which include details of how he converted to radical Islam, were so inflammatory, that without the proper context, jurors were most likely to focus on the most damaging parts while considering whether to impose a death sentence.
"They didn't present the information in any meaningful way," said Lt. Col. John Potter, a military lawyer arguing the case for Akbar before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in Washington.
Akbar was with the 326th Engineer Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, when he was sentenced to death in 2005. He killed Army Capt. Christopher S. Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory L. Stone in Kuwait two years earlier during the early days of the Iraq war.
Prosecutors say he threw four hand grenades into tents as members of his division slept, then fired his rifle at soldiers in the ensuing chaos on March 23, 2003. A military jury at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, convicted Akbar and handed down the sentence. The military has not carried out an execution since 1961. Akbar is one of five ex-soldiers facing a death sentence, the only one for actions in the Iraq war.
Potter told the judges the defense failed to prepare witnesses and errantly let jurors see Akbar's diary, which contained multiple anti-American passages.
Potter said allowing the jury to read the diary "eviscerated the defense in any meaningful way."
"We think the diary, there's no tactical reason to submit the diary," Potter said.
In one entry dated Feb. 23, 2002, Akbar wrote that he believed staying in the Army would eventually lead him to prison.
"I had a premonition that if I re-enlisted I would find myself in jail. That is probably true because I already want to kill several of them," Akbar wrote of his fellow soldiers.
The judges hearing the case focused on how the diary fit into the rest of the defense strategy, asking whether attorneys did anything to put the passages in the context of Akbar's pre-military life or any mental issues he may have had.
Potter noted that the defense put on 38 minutes of mitigation evidence and argument and didn't present any testimony from his family to humanize him. Instead, the lawyers failed by letting jurors pick through the diary and focus on the passages that left their client in the worst possible light.
Prosecutors said Akbar's defense attorneys acted in his best interest to try and prevent a death sentence from being issued in one of the "most egregious offenses in modern military history." The defense attorneys focused on the most viable arguments and witnesses, Maj. Kenneth Borgnino said.
Prosecutors noted that much of Akbar's family likely wouldn't have made a good impression on the witness stand.
The judges did not indicate when a ruling would be issued.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2014/11/19/akbar-appeal-111914/19265341/
A former U.S. soldier sentenced to death for killing two fellow soldiers and injuring 14 others in an attack in Kuwait is pinning his hopes of staying alive on an argument jurors should have never seen his diary.
Attorneys for 43-year-old Hasan K. Akbar argued on Tuesday that the one-time sergeant's writings, which include details of how he converted to radical Islam, were so inflammatory, that without the proper context, jurors were most likely to focus on the most damaging parts while considering whether to impose a death sentence.
"They didn't present the information in any meaningful way," said Lt. Col. John Potter, a military lawyer arguing the case for Akbar before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in Washington.
Akbar was with the 326th Engineer Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, when he was sentenced to death in 2005. He killed Army Capt. Christopher S. Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory L. Stone in Kuwait two years earlier during the early days of the Iraq war.
Prosecutors say he threw four hand grenades into tents as members of his division slept, then fired his rifle at soldiers in the ensuing chaos on March 23, 2003. A military jury at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, convicted Akbar and handed down the sentence. The military has not carried out an execution since 1961. Akbar is one of five ex-soldiers facing a death sentence, the only one for actions in the Iraq war.
Potter told the judges the defense failed to prepare witnesses and errantly let jurors see Akbar's diary, which contained multiple anti-American passages.
Potter said allowing the jury to read the diary "eviscerated the defense in any meaningful way."
"We think the diary, there's no tactical reason to submit the diary," Potter said.
In one entry dated Feb. 23, 2002, Akbar wrote that he believed staying in the Army would eventually lead him to prison.
"I had a premonition that if I re-enlisted I would find myself in jail. That is probably true because I already want to kill several of them," Akbar wrote of his fellow soldiers.
The judges hearing the case focused on how the diary fit into the rest of the defense strategy, asking whether attorneys did anything to put the passages in the context of Akbar's pre-military life or any mental issues he may have had.
Potter noted that the defense put on 38 minutes of mitigation evidence and argument and didn't present any testimony from his family to humanize him. Instead, the lawyers failed by letting jurors pick through the diary and focus on the passages that left their client in the worst possible light.
Prosecutors said Akbar's defense attorneys acted in his best interest to try and prevent a death sentence from being issued in one of the "most egregious offenses in modern military history." The defense attorneys focused on the most viable arguments and witnesses, Maj. Kenneth Borgnino said.
Prosecutors noted that much of Akbar's family likely wouldn't have made a good impression on the witness stand.
The judges did not indicate when a ruling would be issued.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2014/11/19/akbar-appeal-111914/19265341/
Death Penalty
Kuwait
UCMJ
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 487
1
1
0
This is absolutely sickening. I don't know how he made it back to the US alive. There is nothing we can do to make him suffer enough for what he has done.
After all of the friends I have lost, I only wish I had the opportunity to be alone with this sack of shit.
After all of the friends I have lost, I only wish I had the opportunity to be alone with this sack of shit.
(1)
(0)
SSG Jim Foreman
What just amazes me is other nations, our weak politician's, and the liberal media condems the way we treated these prisoners. When are they going to start screaming about the way ISIS ( and their friends) treat women, children, and men? Where are their screams of indignation when someone gets their head cut off because they believe in Jesus Christ. Where is the liberal voice when a IED severs the legs or arms of an American soldier? Why is it America is always wrong and our enemy is always right?
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Does anyone really give a shit about the diary? This pos did what he did, and soldier's died at the hands of another in uniform, someone they should have been able to trust that pathetically attacked them in their sleep. Fuck this guy, shove a grenade up his ass and shoot him in the balls.
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
Family of victims should be the selected firing squad not authorizing them to shoot to kill just continue to shoot until his body gives up and he dies
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
On a daily schedule at random times, hang him just before he stops breathing then let him down. Then blindfold him in front of a firing squad with blanks. Repeat for a few weeks, maybe less maybe more, then give firing squad only .22 cal & make sure they hit the knees. That's all I got to say about that.
(1)
(0)
SPC(P) Carlos Santini
I could not agree more with that idea MSG Lupien. This guy should have the most painful and slow death as possible.
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
Death penalty is too forgiving for him, but I will take it. Just should have been done already!!! Firing squad, but hit him in the gut and let him bleed slow!
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
Tit for tat. Chain his ass to a floor in a tent and roll a grenade or two in there with him!
(1)
(0)
1
1
0
(0)
(0)
CPL Brian Clouser
Obama has not earn that right. He a traitor and need be put up against a wall. My oath was to defend the Constitution not the POS in the White House
(0)
(0)
1
1
0
The soldiers and officer's familys who will never see there loved ones again because of this cowardly and coldly piece of trash he took there Without no remorse should not have any remorse on his soul he needs to get that uniform off hes a disgrace to the us army and the United States of America! He needs to be terminated now!!
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google