Posted on Nov 19, 2014
Military court weighing fate of condemned soldier. What Are Your Thoughts?
394K
3.4K
1.23K
80
79
1
From: Army Times
A former U.S. soldier sentenced to death for killing two fellow soldiers and injuring 14 others in an attack in Kuwait is pinning his hopes of staying alive on an argument jurors should have never seen his diary.
Attorneys for 43-year-old Hasan K. Akbar argued on Tuesday that the one-time sergeant's writings, which include details of how he converted to radical Islam, were so inflammatory, that without the proper context, jurors were most likely to focus on the most damaging parts while considering whether to impose a death sentence.
"They didn't present the information in any meaningful way," said Lt. Col. John Potter, a military lawyer arguing the case for Akbar before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in Washington.
Akbar was with the 326th Engineer Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, when he was sentenced to death in 2005. He killed Army Capt. Christopher S. Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory L. Stone in Kuwait two years earlier during the early days of the Iraq war.
Prosecutors say he threw four hand grenades into tents as members of his division slept, then fired his rifle at soldiers in the ensuing chaos on March 23, 2003. A military jury at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, convicted Akbar and handed down the sentence. The military has not carried out an execution since 1961. Akbar is one of five ex-soldiers facing a death sentence, the only one for actions in the Iraq war.
Potter told the judges the defense failed to prepare witnesses and errantly let jurors see Akbar's diary, which contained multiple anti-American passages.
Potter said allowing the jury to read the diary "eviscerated the defense in any meaningful way."
"We think the diary, there's no tactical reason to submit the diary," Potter said.
In one entry dated Feb. 23, 2002, Akbar wrote that he believed staying in the Army would eventually lead him to prison.
"I had a premonition that if I re-enlisted I would find myself in jail. That is probably true because I already want to kill several of them," Akbar wrote of his fellow soldiers.
The judges hearing the case focused on how the diary fit into the rest of the defense strategy, asking whether attorneys did anything to put the passages in the context of Akbar's pre-military life or any mental issues he may have had.
Potter noted that the defense put on 38 minutes of mitigation evidence and argument and didn't present any testimony from his family to humanize him. Instead, the lawyers failed by letting jurors pick through the diary and focus on the passages that left their client in the worst possible light.
Prosecutors said Akbar's defense attorneys acted in his best interest to try and prevent a death sentence from being issued in one of the "most egregious offenses in modern military history." The defense attorneys focused on the most viable arguments and witnesses, Maj. Kenneth Borgnino said.
Prosecutors noted that much of Akbar's family likely wouldn't have made a good impression on the witness stand.
The judges did not indicate when a ruling would be issued.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2014/11/19/akbar-appeal-111914/19265341/
A former U.S. soldier sentenced to death for killing two fellow soldiers and injuring 14 others in an attack in Kuwait is pinning his hopes of staying alive on an argument jurors should have never seen his diary.
Attorneys for 43-year-old Hasan K. Akbar argued on Tuesday that the one-time sergeant's writings, which include details of how he converted to radical Islam, were so inflammatory, that without the proper context, jurors were most likely to focus on the most damaging parts while considering whether to impose a death sentence.
"They didn't present the information in any meaningful way," said Lt. Col. John Potter, a military lawyer arguing the case for Akbar before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in Washington.
Akbar was with the 326th Engineer Battalion of the 101st Airborne Division based at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, when he was sentenced to death in 2005. He killed Army Capt. Christopher S. Seifert and Air Force Maj. Gregory L. Stone in Kuwait two years earlier during the early days of the Iraq war.
Prosecutors say he threw four hand grenades into tents as members of his division slept, then fired his rifle at soldiers in the ensuing chaos on March 23, 2003. A military jury at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, convicted Akbar and handed down the sentence. The military has not carried out an execution since 1961. Akbar is one of five ex-soldiers facing a death sentence, the only one for actions in the Iraq war.
Potter told the judges the defense failed to prepare witnesses and errantly let jurors see Akbar's diary, which contained multiple anti-American passages.
Potter said allowing the jury to read the diary "eviscerated the defense in any meaningful way."
"We think the diary, there's no tactical reason to submit the diary," Potter said.
In one entry dated Feb. 23, 2002, Akbar wrote that he believed staying in the Army would eventually lead him to prison.
"I had a premonition that if I re-enlisted I would find myself in jail. That is probably true because I already want to kill several of them," Akbar wrote of his fellow soldiers.
The judges hearing the case focused on how the diary fit into the rest of the defense strategy, asking whether attorneys did anything to put the passages in the context of Akbar's pre-military life or any mental issues he may have had.
Potter noted that the defense put on 38 minutes of mitigation evidence and argument and didn't present any testimony from his family to humanize him. Instead, the lawyers failed by letting jurors pick through the diary and focus on the passages that left their client in the worst possible light.
Prosecutors said Akbar's defense attorneys acted in his best interest to try and prevent a death sentence from being issued in one of the "most egregious offenses in modern military history." The defense attorneys focused on the most viable arguments and witnesses, Maj. Kenneth Borgnino said.
Prosecutors noted that much of Akbar's family likely wouldn't have made a good impression on the witness stand.
The judges did not indicate when a ruling would be issued.
http://www.armytimes.com/story/military/crime/2014/11/19/akbar-appeal-111914/19265341/
Death Penalty
Kuwait
UCMJ
Posted 10 y ago
Responses: 487
1
0
1
I think it should be death by firing squad composed of and willing family members or unit members. I call it the step out back method. No more free housing, free food, or free legal aid. We all know that freed is not free. One bucket of ammo and any unit or family members wanting to participate. Could we add Burgdahl to the list and save time?
(1)
(1)
0
0
0
Why does he still have rank and awards on his uniform? I thought that all of that was striped from a service member when they were court marshaled. He should have all of the emblems removed from his uniform publicly and then handed a hammer to make big rocks into little rocks until he is escorted into a nice room, strapped to a comfortable bed, and..."You might feel a little pinch..."
(0)
(0)
Capt Richard Theis
I believe that they board has not passed sentence yet, so he is able to retain rank and awards. Depending on the severity of his sentence/ punishment, he may have a dishonorable discharge ,as well as, reduction in rank and pay or made persona non grata as far as the military is concerned and have all rank and awards removed. None of those things will occur until official sentence is passed.
(0)
(0)
Capt Richard Theis
On a personal note...a firing squad would be too merciful for his acts. He should be disgraced by being beheaded by a female military member while being broadcasted on Al Jazeera television along with his buddy Major Hasan! A hood over the head and a use for one of those guillotines that the government has purchased would work well.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
I was stationed at FTCKY at the time of this occurrence. It is sad that one would ever turn on their own; furthermore, the mere fact that he would justify his coward acts by religious fate. He was convicted, he needs to be a man and accept his fate.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
His day in court was nothing more than a formality. Take him out to sea and do a trash call! P.S. toss his diary over with him.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
I'm all for him getting the death penalty. War is a tragedy, but it is made more of one when you are being attacked/killed by those you hope to be safe with and protect your back. Let him die slowly. I hate saying that, but there it is.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
How stupid is this guy? The argument was a passage saying he wanted to kill people. Time to face what he made others face.
(0)
(0)
SGT Andrew Doyle
I was at camp Pennsylvania when this guy went crazy I member it being very cold, and seeing him sitting on the ground with a woobie wrapped around him as I was pulling guard behind him. I hope he gets what he deserves.
(1)
(0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
I say put him next to Saddam and celebrate. I think he should be stoned to death. I wouldnt even waste a bullet on him, plus its a quick death nothing he deaerves at all.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google