3
3
0
I think that the purpose of federal recognition was important in the past, especially when the National Guard was an organization run very differently from active duty.
But now that schooling is centralized and the Guard, in structure, parallels active duty, is there a reason why federal recognition still exists?
But now that schooling is centralized and the Guard, in structure, parallels active duty, is there a reason why federal recognition still exists?
Edited 8 y ago
Posted 8 y ago
Responses: 6
I don't necessarily disagree with the idea of the fedrec process, however my main concern is the length of time to get through. Currently I'm awaiting to be recognized to Captain. It's been eight months since my packet was submitted and comparing myself to others before me, I'll likely have to wait another four months before I get pinned. All-in-all, about a year of turnaround time.
From an outsider's perspective to the process, it seems like an inefficient system. I haven't been able to find any information out there as to what is actually being validated/confirmed. If anyone has more information I'd love to know. One would think that validating civ education, military schools, apft, ht/wt, and a background check would take at most a few weeks or months.
From an outsider's perspective to the process, it seems like an inefficient system. I haven't been able to find any information out there as to what is actually being validated/confirmed. If anyone has more information I'd love to know. One would think that validating civ education, military schools, apft, ht/wt, and a background check would take at most a few weeks or months.
(2)
(0)
CW2 (Join to see)
Sir, I've heard similar stories as I'm going through the steps for WO right now. There has to be a more efficient manner in which we utilize new technology to make this happen. However, I do not hold much hope considering we can't centralize most administrative systems at this point
(0)
(0)
Oh heck yes there's a reason Federal recognition is still important! State GO's are still appointed by Governors. Politics play a role therefore as an additional check and balance it's good to keep it. I have a classmate that was retired from Active Duty Army as an 0-5 LTC. He's now been appointed as GAARNG as a 1 star General. In South Carolina the TAG is Elected. You really need to make sure they meet federal standards!
(2)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Sir, I agree with GOs, but for most company and field grade officers, the standards remain the same. Officers complete the same BOLC, same civilian education requirements and have this undue length added to the promotion process.
(0)
(0)
Sir, to directly answer you, I believe the actual "process" is outdated, but I do not believe the concept is. I think we can make it significantly more efficient than it currently stands, but, I do believe it is a necessity. I would believe that much of our complaints rely around the inefficient timing of it all, not really about having to do it.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next