8
8
0
I understand that Soldiers are required to make appointments they schedule, it's their responsibility. Is it really worth an article 15? Maybe i just don't see how the Army is losing money if you miss a 15 minute appointment. It's not like they run those expensive machines waiting on you or even show up on time themselves.
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 36
Its about personal accountability and responsibility, and depending on what kind of appointment it was, someone else could have taken that spot. Things happen at times when you cant make the appt, (mission or emergencies) but just blowing it off is irresponsible. Now an Article 15 for 1st offense it may be a little harsh but if they have a habit of missing appts then yes i would have recommended one.
(0)
(0)
LTC Paul Labrador
It may also be that the BN or BDE (or even post) may be having an issue and the commander has had enough of getting chewed on by Garrison....
(0)
(0)
Actually, the cost of an appointment, for whichever reason you schedule it, costs money. In Fort Carson, they would post the cost of certain types of appointments in civilian form showing that however minute one feels about a missed appointment, that spot could have been given to someone who actually needs it and would have kept their appointment. Article 15's may be a little harsh for first time offenders, but repeat offenders, once counseled, should be shown the severity and administratively dealt with accordingly.
(0)
(0)
It would have to depend on the circumstances. I'm big on individual accountability, but I also recognize that when Soldiers have it beat into thier heads to ensure their NCO knows about upcoming appointments, that NCOs should ensure the Soldier makes it to that appointment. If the Soldier is managed carefully and is reminded, yet still misses out of carelessness or blatantly blows it off, then disciplinary action is needed.
(0)
(0)
Read This Next