Posted on Sep 2, 2016
CW2 C2 Systems Integrator
31K
280
110
17
17
0
0c3a586
Units are being told to select new female armor and infantry officers for platoon leader positions ahead of their male counterparts who have been waiting for the position.

Not sure if this guidance has extended to the NCO side.
Avatar feed
Responses: 54
SGT David A. 'Cowboy' Groth
2
2
0
I think they should be mentored by the platoon leaders first, than when the platoon leader moves up the ranks, let them move into the slot. Only my opinion.
(2)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
LTC Laborer
1
1
0
Back in the day, a newly minted armor 2LT's first assignment was as a platoon leader ... with very little, if any, wait time. I can't imagine that it is much different now. There aren't all that many, if any, 2LT non-platoon leader positions in armor ... and none in an armor company. Platoon leader positions weren't "earned" ... they were where a 2LT earned one's spurs ... or washed out. Have things changed that much since I retired?
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CW2 Carl Swanson
1
1
0
I don't really see any difference from puting some young inexperienced 2LT in a platoon leader slot. He doesn't know what he is doing either. How else are they going to learn? Now just throwing an officer into a BN or higher command position without understanding what is going on based on their experience or lack thereof is borderline criminal. If they can do the job, they can do the job.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
CPT Transportation Officer
1
1
0
If they meet the qualifications, they should be able to lead. Leading troops is one of the greatest honors, I feel only the best should lead regardless of gender.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Steven Smith
1
1
0
Without going into great detail and having actual lived into or next to my tank for years I am against female crew members. Additionally nobody should be placed ahead of another person based on their gender. It is absurd.
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SFC Pete Kain
1
1
0
Well I certainly feel safer knowing that our leadership cares enough to promote based on a cause and not performance. (SARCASAM)
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SGM Mikel Dawson
1
1
0
Why am I not surprised. If they were put on the list in order, then no problem. There's nothing equal about this. Just like the story of the Idaho ARNG SFC who just qualified as a M1 tank crew member. No way would she be qualified to take the true SFC position directly from a 16 week qualification course: http://www.military.com/daily-news/2016/06/28/boise-woman-is-nation-first-female-tank-crew-member.html
(1)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
MAJ Keira Brennan
1
1
0
Mr. Verlin, where is the DA Pam from FORSCOM directly this? Just because NBC reports it doesn't mean its so.
(1)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jenna Bisenius
SPC Jenna Bisenius
>1 y
Ah, now this is interesting! So maybe this is just "gossip"? Never occurred to me. Hmmmm....anyone out there know for sure that this is a firm directive being inacted?
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Capt Tom Brown
1
1
0
This article popped up on Google does not say anything about giving women priority placement in leadership positions ahead males. Maybe there is something more out there on just how they are going to place the women.
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/276498-army-approves-first-22-women-to-be-ground-combat-officers
(1)
Comment
(0)
SPC Jenna Bisenius
SPC Jenna Bisenius
>1 y
Yes, let's question it -- I want to know for SURE if it is true!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Instructor
0
0
0
This is against everything we shove down our own throats every quarter. This is a direct violation of EO. This is the vile belly I hate about the Army; we ay one thing and do another for some civilian who doesn’t know what it’s like to deal with these kinds of issues nor do they care as long as they get votes for doing it. This makes me sick.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close