Posted on Aug 22, 2014
CPT Aaron Kletzing
361K
2.13K
963
111
111
0
Confed2
Confed
Recently, I had a long and heated discussion with a fellow veteran about this issue. I don't know for sure whether a branch-specific reg or a DoD-wide reg exists that prohibits/allows personnel on a military installation to display the Confederate flag on their personal vehicle or on their person (e.g. a belt buckle). Maybe this is a base-specific policy and left to the judgment of the installation commander. Display of the Confederate flag is a divisive issue and people often feel really strongly one way or the other. But today, it is still a relevant topic and touches on other military leadership/discipline areas, including the actions of one member deeply offending another member -- regardless of whether said action is legal/authorized. That can create huge problems in a military unit, and this happened in a unit I personally served in. So, below are my questions for the RallyPoint community about this issue.

Please try to keep comments professional (don't attack one another) and explain your thoughts as best you can.

Questions:
(1) How do you feel about the Confederate flag being displayed on the vehicle/person of a service member if he/she is ON post? How does your opinion change if the member is OFF post?
(2) What does the Confederate flag symbolize to you personally? What do you think it can symbolize to other people around you who may perceive it differently?
(3) If you have personally experienced a military-related situation where a symbol/flag caused someone to be offended, what happened and what did you/would you have done as the leader?

I look fwd to everyone's thoughts on this. Personally, I have some strong feelings about this issue, though I don't want to bias people's answers upfront. Please be as honest as possible.

Tag: SSG Emily Williams Col (Join to see) 1SG Steven Stankovich SSG Scott Williams 1LT Sandy Annala CPT (Join to see) SSG V. Michelle Woods MSG Carl Cunningham
Edited 10 y ago
Avatar feed
Responses: 326
MAJ Rn
0
0
0
The flag is to me like the "Allah Huwa Akbar" shout. It means one thing to devout muslims but to me it sez "Take cover, lock and load etc" The CSA flag has multiple interpretations. One's race and region likely serve as good predictors of your opinion on it.

In all likelihood few KKK types are openly running around advertising bigotry. Though I don't have any flag decal on any POV I have for years been involved with SCV. Sons of Confederate Veterans is not threat to anyone. No political agenda beyond their own self-described commitment to "Historical accuracy" as it pertains to "heritage violations"
And yet thru neglect and indifference the CSA battle flag increasingly has been commandeered by Klanners and other kooks, despite the best efforts of SCV to deny the flag's use to advance any modern 20th or 21st century political/racist agenda.

White good old boys are loyal to the south. That doesnt mean they celebrate George Wallace or Lester Maddux or Orval Faubus or (insert segregationist name here). For most folks I suspect the CSA flag is a point of "ethnic pride" not unlike the way Puerto Rican troops (even those born here in CONUS with zero connection to the island anymore) adorn their POVs with the flag of their beloved Commonwealth. Remember if the flag has blue stripes and a star on a RED field you may or may not be facing an ally!!

If you want to venerate the bravery of an ancestor (which is really what most old SCV folks want most to do) use the CSA "national flag": it is 7 stars in a circle on a blue field. Then to the right of the star circle is a broad red/white/red triple stripes.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Rn
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
As it says in the Bible if something causes a brother to stumble it is best to get rid of it. Of course, there is also an opp to educate the brother whose offense might not be truly justified. In Tx one of the biggest defenders of CSA historic heritage is in fact an African American man (somewhat of a kook to many) who wears a grey confederate uniform.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SPC Christopher Morehouse
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
My personal belief is that it is unappropriated. Regardless of your personal beliefs on the purpose and ramifications of the Civil War, and what the symbol means to you, the fact of the matter is it is the flag of a belligerent organization which violated the US Constitution. It was an enemy of which the United States Army fought it's bloodiest war. I do not believe it appropriate for US military members to take up the symbol of an enemy of which no peace was ever attained. I would expect US military not to fly the flag of North Korea, Nazi Germany, The Soviet Union, or the Saddam Regime Iraqi flag.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Rn
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
The CSA men felt it was the Unon which violated the constitution. Robert E. Lee openly despised slavery as what it was "a moral and political evil" and yet Lee also famously said "a Federal union of states which requires rifles and bayonets to hold it together can never hold any affections from me". That to me says a great deal. Lincoln to his eternal credit was willing to "by any means necessary" keep the Union together. Had the nation split apart we would likely had a heavily patroled border for the 19th and most of the 20th century. Moreover as Harry Turtledove vividly imagined it, CSA and USA would have likely been drawn into WW1 or WW2 on oppposite sides.
Like Lee, most of the CSA officer corps were Westpoint educate men but their allegiance to state above national govt though we may fault it in 21st century was entirely understood. Prior to CW folks said the United States "are" [not is] and one's primary loyalty was to New Hampshire or Massachusetts or Alabama. The CW was necessary to modernize our nation and truly bind us together as one and not just different tribes and factions as we see in premodern nations around the globe to this very day.
(2)
Reply
(0)
SPC Christopher Morehouse
SPC Christopher Morehouse
>1 y
They waited until after Lincolns election to break away. They did not want to honor the election, or constitutional process for changing laws, and so they blatantly violated them by saying in no uncertain terms "The US Constitution no longer applies here. Federal Law no longer applies here. Go Screw yourself".

As much as those confederate officers who were west point graduates might have been good leaders, they were also all traitors. They Swore this Oath: ""I, _____, appointed a _____ in the Army of the United States, do solemnly swear, or affirm, that I will bear true allegiance to the United States of America, and that I will serve them honestly and faithfully against all their enemies or opposers whatsoever, and observe and obey the orders of the President of the United States, and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to the rules and articles for the government of the Armies of the United States."

There is no grey area there. in 1982 the Oath was changed for officers to include affirmation that they have never taken up arms against the US, or supported actions against the Constitution.

Lee might have felt that the Union wasn't worth preserving if it had to be done by force of Arms, but that's a flawed logic at best and a delusional justification for his loyalty to Virginia over the Union at worst. It was a flawed justification for breaking his oath because powers that be in the South were frustrated with their diminishing influence to keep the status quo.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Capt Gregory Prickett
Capt Gregory Prickett
>1 y
SPC Christopher Morehouse

No, that's not correct. The first aggressive act was when MAJ Anderson occupied Fort Sumter in Dec. 1860, after President Buchanan had given assurances that the uncompleted fort would not be manned. He then tried to supply the garrison using the Star of the West, even though the harbor was closed. Only after being informed that President Lincoln intended to encroach on South Carolina sovereignty by resupplying and reinforcing, did BG Beauregard demand the surrender of Fort Sumter.

That's why the conflict is known as the War of Northern Aggression in the South.

Second, there was no change of the officer's oath in 1982, the same oath has been in use by the military since 1962. See 5 U.S.C. 3331; 10 U.S.C. 626.

Third, one's first loyalty at that time was to one's State, not the Federal government.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
PVT Director Afghan Operations Grp
0
0
0
A great forum. FREEDOM of expression is one of the things we fight for as active, reserve and national guardsmen.
Shaking someone's hand with your left hand is a symbol of disrespect... But it happens and no one loses sleep over it.
To most here....do the research on the flag in question. When one builds a case on "notions" it makes you look silly.
The bottom line is very blurry here..and permit me to explain. IF this flag is a symbol of racism...WHY are there large groups of Blacks hanging around each other on post in public? Same thing can be said about whites, Latinos, Asians and the whole lot of folks. ARE WE NOT all GREEN?
That action in itself is a symbol of racism...I hear the whole flurry of excuses...."white folks don't understand", "black folks are don't like hanging around with us"....blah blah blah....We are ALL American...we speak English....so what's the deal?
If you as an individual are too self inverted to take the time....AS A LEADER...to acknowledge, ask and get to know one another....then that in itself is a ignorant view of expression and what the term actually means.
The flag of the Army of Northern Virginia is similar to someone having a close feeling about a football team...or basketball team. Why do people wear sports jerseys on post? SAME REASON...different rationale. It is a symbol that defines an individual.
I can call Cowboys fans homos....or Lakers fans knuckledraggers....its the same logic....it is a symbol of pride to you...the individual. You never played on the team...you aren't an NFL or NBA player....but you still say " we had a bad season....bad game...we won...etc."
Would you like to be judged as a coward, a traitor, a racist, or just plain ignorant for being a fan of those faggety assed sports?
If that struck a chord in you...(and the above is just being used as an example)...just think about that when you see others having pride in something different than you. It doesn't make it wrong...or gives you the right to pass judgment... It just means that someone has pride in something that has value to them.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PO1 Ron Clark
0
0
0
I know that I may ruffle some feathers here, however, personally there should be only one flag displayed on a U.S. Military base! Old Glory! That being said, some people feel that the Confederate flag is something honorable to be displayed, I beg to differ. The folks fighting for what they believe in is honorable, but, people attempting to over throw a standing are known as insurgents, definition is as follows: "Insurgent" a person who rises in forcible opposition to lawful authority, especially a person who engages in armed resistance to a government or to the execution of its laws; rebel. Its very offensive and has no place to be displayed on a military other than inside someones' domicile.
(0)
Comment
(0)
MAJ Rn
MAJ (Join to see)
>1 y
Again, there were legal scholars in the south who understood their duty to the constitution of their state as requiring secession. We have the hindsight of the 21st century which legal scholars like Judah P. Benjamin etc did not. Secession may have been constitutional and legal but they were blind to the immorality of chattel slavery. And if you are legally and constitutionally correct but morally wrong and fail to recognize that fact then that to me is the tragedy of our era's legal abortion and that era's legal slavery. The arguments made to defend both are eerily parallel and similar.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
Sgt Bill Right
0
0
0
Edited >1 y ago
After reading many comments on the subject at hand what I find more interesting is that patriotism often blinds people to the truth-often plain truth that is readily available. There's a lot of things that we were all taught in school that's just not true under the light of day. Examples are: The Mississippi is the longest river in the United States (but it's not); The cheetah is the fastest land animal (but it's not); bad weather sank the Spanish Armada (but the ship and port logs all around of all the British ships at sea and in port had reported good weather ten days before and after that alleged event); however, I could continue and burst some of your ignorant patriotic or scientific beliefs but I won't. An exception I will make will be disregarded by 90% of the readers. No northern state legislature declared nor enforced the abolition of slavery but several southern states did in the 1850s. All ignorant people believe whatever they are told and this case if you just disregard my words without further research then you are nothing more than an ignorant hayseed and ten times worse than any self-proclaimed redneck; additionally, you believe that 2 plus 2 equals 7 in this analogy. Did it ever occur to any of you that are currently disregarding my comments that it's rather strange that the slave railroad was operated in northern states? Why? I would answer it for you but that would spoil your soon to be self discovery and your liberation from lies that divide and destabilize educated patriotism. But I digress, most of you won't read my comments down this far because you are truly bigoted and permanently enslaved in your ignorance. Truly, ignorance is bliss. If you live near or visit Fort Hood, then go to the last lobby outside of the NCOA classrooms and look at the miniature paintings of the southern armies. Or don't.
(0)
Comment
(0)
CPO Culinary Specialist
CPO (Join to see)
>1 y
Sgt Bill Right,

If there was anything of value in what you said, thank you. Such a demonstrative way of talking and a total decay of respect for others as individuals and most certainly your peers on this page. This being said, I am left wondering ... how terrible it would be a person of your caliber actually being in a position of leadership. Some people rise as a result of skills and abilities, sadly some are like a turd in the bathtub. Either way they can rise, so here is some feedback for you also.
I enjoy this site, the people are very well thought out for the overall. The quality of information and truth that comes out is quite challenging for learning and military history.

Now that you have unloaded my guess you have been carrying that for a while... Perhaps you could express yourself in a more concise manner with focus and clarity on your central point.

Do you want people to research?
Read?
Challenge you personally?
Challenge you professionally?
Arouse emotions to take the topic way off track?
Just needed to vent?
You don't like people and want to share that?

The list goes on and on, so having given you a couple of examples, perhaps you might be more clear in your thought. That would help if you are looking at a discussion. Thanks. BTW, grew up just outside of Gettysburg and the underground market was a very real part of the history of our area. I grew up reading, feeling and understanding the full scope of the sociological perspective taking place at the time.
If you would like to have discussion, please consider clarity in your statement. If not, that is ok, just was not sure what you were looking for from anybody.
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Michael Glenn
0
0
0
Kinda turning the table a bit here...but could someone please explain to me why a vehicle is dubbed a POV when its not??? when I was stationed in Germany I was a Neo warden and it was our job to ensure that we told all soldiers who had said POV to keep them fully tanked at all times in case we had to evacuate.The vehicles would be used to transport personnel as needed and then be disposed of as needed. Also while stationed in Germany I was told countless times that its not a right to own said POV but a privilege and if the commander didnt want a specific soldier to have one they couldnt. Also I was told that a vehicle that has Government plates or a military sticker in the windshield is government property. We had a soldier who was late for roll out, the company area was down hill a good half mile from the motor pool, so he threw all his gear into his trunk to include his weapon.When he got to the motor pool someone saw him pulling all this "sensitive Item gear " from his POV, the next thing he knew he was receiving a field grade for this, but it was dropped because the argument was brought up that a POV isnt in fact a POV but belongs to the Government. Clarification anyone ??? Ohh and by the way country boys will be country boys will be country boys....just saying....
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
PFC Jim Mills
0
0
0
Growing up in the north and the south and having family from both and african American family aswell this has been a discussion many times and we have all come to the conclusion that the only reason the flag is an issue are people that use race as a way to build there own agendas !! Like the way the whole ferguson issue was carried on and now we have more hate and discontent and dead police officers ! The the problem is racism is a double edged sword and without proper education it will always make hearts bleed
(0)
Comment
(0)
PO1 Ron Clark
PO1 Ron Clark
>1 y
Well PFC I cant stay out of this conversation with you because, Ferguson and the Confederate flag issue is different! The flag serves no viable purpose on a US military installation other than to offend/promote the secret racist agenda that the south will rise again mentality, (let the issue and flag die a well earned/deserved death). Most white supremacist hold this confederate flag more dearly than the US flag, being born and raised in the south I know this to be true. While you are a member of the military, you will be REQUIRED to help all people regardless of race, creed or nationality, religion, etc., if you are in the military we are all brothers in arm. My true brother would not attempt to offend me especially since we hold each other lives in each others hands at one time or another. I didnt say that you couldnt fly the flag if you choose to (inside your own home/foot locker etc., just not in public view.
(0)
Reply
(0)
PFC Jim Mills
PFC Jim Mills
>1 y
Did you miss the part that i have people of other race in my family and not only that i dont have the flag displayed anywhere and neither does anyone i know and mostly because of the negative attention it brings.Do you really in your heart believe that everyone during that time was racist? What about segregation up north and out west? What about segregation going on now or reverse racism? A flag doesnt make a person racist
(1)
Reply
(0)
Cpl Matthew Wall
Cpl Matthew Wall
>1 y
PO1 Ron Clark Let me ask you this then. When a black person displays this flag does that mean that they are a white supremacist and hold racist views towards other black people?
(1)
Reply
(0)
PO1 Ron Clark
PO1 Ron Clark
>1 y
Just stupid as heck! Dont know nothing about their history! That's all Corporal!
(1)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SMSgt Senior Enlisted Leader, Religious Affairs
0
0
0
I personally don't understand why people are so proud of the Confederate flag or why it is still flying any place in this country 150 years after the Civil War. From the flag's very conception it was Anti-American. It was flown by people who wanted nothing to do with America any more, and decided to start their own country. It is a complete contradiction to fight for the American flag and defend the Confederate one at the same time. Regardless of how it reminds southerners of fond memories of home, that doesn't change what the flag represents. To think that you can just change what something like that represents after 4 years of Civil War is as misguided as African Americans saying they are putting a positive spin on the N word by using it to address each, or dropping the "er" and replacing it with an "a". That word still means what it was originally intended to, and so does the flag. Then you throw on all the racial connotations associated with it as well. To me it's a no brainer. What's even more ironic is a lot of times people that support the Confederate Flag are the same people who get mad at Mexicans and Puerto Ricans for displaying their home country's flag in America. At least those flags aren't Anti-American.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSG Dwight Amey MSA, MSL, BS, AS
0
0
0
(1) How do you feel about the Confederate flag being displayed on the vehicle/person of a service member if he/she is ON post? How does your opinion change if the member is OFF post?

My first impression is the person displaying this flag probably would attack me if he had the chance, because of what economic system fueled its origins. I think of Willie Lynch a businessman in the slave industry around the world. This is my opinion only, here is a statement he made while speaking to slave owners somewhere in the colony of Virginia in 1712,

“I have outlined a number of differences among the slaves, and I take these differences and make them bigger. I use fear, distrust, and envy for control purposes. These methods have worked on my modest plantation in the West Indies, and it will work throughout the South. Take this simple little test of differences and think about them. On the top of my list is "Age", but it is there because it only starts with an "A"; the second is "Color" or shade; there is intelligence, size, sex, size of plantations, attitude of owners, whether the slaves live in the valley, on a hill, East, West, North, South, have fine or coarse hair, or is tall or short. Now that you have a list of differences, I shall give you an outline of action--but before that, I shall assure you that distrust is stronger than trust, and envy is stronger than adulation, respect, or admiration” (African American images, 2015 p. 1). http://www.africanamericanimages.com/aai/willie%20lynch.htm

Fact or fiction this individual or someone made up served as a catalyst to perpetuate the success of an economic system based off human labor for hundreds of years. This cannot be disputed.

As a black man this strikes me with fear. To think our Constitution once authorized this type of doctrine is even more terrifying. In addition, the reality is, some Americans still view this man (or the idea) in high regard today not only in the south.

I think of President Woodrow Wilson, who brought segregation to the North in the federal government. This flag represents the reality that with enough votes our Constitution can return to the acceptance of the doctrine translated into something else.

I don’t see it as a racial superiority issue as much as an economic belief system that used slaves all around the world as production capital. Some may say that the Bible condones slavery. Well, I was fortunate enough to hold a real slave bible from the 1800’s in my hand from a Professor from Colorado State foreign policy class in 2002. The bible is saw had verses in there reflected the 18th century ideas of what being a slave should be twisting the Bible texts out of context. Easy because speaking African language slaves probably did not know any better.

My second impression is the individual displaying the flag may have family legacy that may not have ties or beliefs to slavery, but was part of the Confederate Nation.

I think of a conversation I had with a German National who taught school at our American High School in Vilseck Germany. We started talking about Hitler. He said that Hitler was a good leader that got Germany out of their economic depression, but he did not agree with his racial superiority and world dominance agendas. His father was an officer in the SS before and during WWII. I think if we get past the high octane emotions of the fluff we can begin to find a path to snuffing out racial hate.
(0)
Comment
(0)
SSG Dwight Amey MSA, MSL, BS, AS
SSG Dwight Amey MSA, MSL, BS, AS
>1 y
1LT L S, very interesting. Your post brings up another unsung heroes of our Constitution and equal rights. White people. I recognize that our Constitution allowed slavery to exist to preserve the union. But, some California black family and friends want to cast the entire white population as an not trusted. I understand how Jim Crowe, Segregation, gave them this belief. Terror tactics of the few were so effective, they effected a large majority of blacks in America to "keep their place". Well, I believe millions of white men and women died to protect the blacks right to go from capital 2/3rds of a person to a regular human being. This did not just happen, changing our Constitution is a dramatic step. The whole thing with love and respect. It is earned, these white Americans who have fought for me to have the rights I enjoy today need to have their holiday. President Lincoln serves as an icon but many more involved in the Abolitionist Campaign did their parts too.

While at a baseball game in 1983 I was in Junior High. My best friend had a baseball game. I was not playing this season. During the game a black man was yelling at the umpire disagreeing with a call. A white man turned to my friends dad with me sitting next to him asking should we take that #$#$ from this $#$#$ we should kick his $$$. Understanding my best friend's dad was a ex-green berets and respected CPA in the city. He told the man that we should keep cool he is not hurting anyone. That moment taught me something about white people. More are good and a portion of them are dangerous.
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
SGT Police Officer
0
0
0
With regards to the Stars and Bars, perception is everything. It will vary from person to person, whether they view its purposes for history, racism, or just a memory of home. That being said, I really have no problem, as long as it's displayed with respect and decency.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close