Posted on Jul 23, 2015
CW4 Brigade Maintenance Technician
2.6K
2
9
2
2
0
Avatar feed
Responses: 4
SGT David T.
0
0
0
Wasn't this thing supposed to replace tanks when they first came up with it?
(0)
Comment
(0)
SGT David T.
SGT David T.
>1 y
I could have swore I saw concept pictures with tank like guns on them...My memory must be going lol
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Stephen Gober
SGT Stephen Gober
9 y
There are 10 Stryker variants on two chassis. The one you're thinking of is the mgs4 Mobile Gun System.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SGT Stephen Gober
SGT Stephen Gober
9 y
That was supposed to say MGS.
(0)
Reply
(0)
SSG James Newman
SSG James Newman
9 y
Yes the MGS has 108mm cannon, they originally were supposed to have 120mm but the cannon was too big for the Stryker. Strykers were never intended to replace tanks. They decided to go with Strykers after the 1st Gulf War when the 82nd was the only unit between Saddam in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Feeling was that the division wouldn't have taken thousands of casualties had Saddam pushed further forward and Strykers are supposed to be the "happy" medium
(0)
Reply
(0)
Avatar small
MSG Intermediate Care Technician
0
0
0
So, instead of dusting off the M1 tanks, or gassing up the Bradleys, the idea to spend money to change cannons on Strykers is the way people want to go? Interesting.
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small
SSgt Geospatial Intelligence
0
0
0
I think the more interesting thing this article points out is that Russia is being seen as a bigger threat again. If they need the upgrade, & the threat is truly legitimate, then go for it. Perhaps in the meantime, produce the weapons so they can be fitted quickly if escalation occurs?
(0)
Comment
(0)
Avatar small

Join nearly 2 million former and current members of the US military, just like you.

close