Posted on Feb 20, 2014
Do you think it is OK to degrade or fellow service members for lesser accomplishments?
10.2K
21
17
1
1
0
We have all heard it or said it. When a service member is in a unit and has not done/accomplished what most of the unit has, there is a derogatory phrase associated with them.
We can say it is time-honored tradition or good-natured ribbing, but at the end of the day it is done for no other reason than to belittle and make the SM feel he/she is a lesser soldier.
Prime example: when I arrived at Fort Bragg in 1998, I had not completed Airborne training. Therefore, I was a "leg". My 1SG would drop me everytime he saw me, because I hadn't yet gone to Airborne school. "Drop Leg."
When I went to PLDC in '99, I was leading PT one morning, and we were on a run. I started clling a cadence and asked where all the legs were at. My SGL jumped all over me. I was informed that we were no longer allowed to refer to them as Legs. They were now to be referred to as non-airborne personnel.
I spent 2 1/2 years in that unit, and was consistently belittled by other members of the company because I didn't have my wings. 1SG actually walked away from a conversation he and I were having because "he couldn't hear me with no wings on my chest." And this was in a training meeting. I was the training NCO.
In another thread on RP, a soldier with a deployment referred to an NCO who hadn't as a "slick-sleeved" SGT. There was no respect in the statement or the story.
So, all that was said to say: How is Esprit De Corps built when we have "time-honored" traditions of belittling SM's who don't have the same tabs, patches or wings?
Posted 11 y ago
Responses: 12
Never okay to degrade!<div><br></div><div>Im not getting all soft now on you, but where's the gain in doing so?</div><div><br></div><div>Most men have not been able to accomplish things in their career because they were in a unit and did not have those oppertunities. Rarely do we see people avoiding deployments, saying no to PME, or training. </div>
(5)
(0)
It never ok degrade a fellow service member or anyone for that matter for lesser accomplishments. It is unacceptable and shouldn't be tolerated anywhere.
(4)
(0)
Ragging on Soldiers for doing or not doing something outside of their control isn't in the best of interest of the Command. A Soldier could have a legitimate reason as to why they were/aren't able to receive such awards/deployments/schools. In my honest opinion, someone who rags a Soldier for these types of things should grow up and mature a little. I say leave those training to folks who think they need them because they are insecure about themselves and they need something on their chest to fill important and worthwhile.
I for one have never received any training that you sew onto your uniform, however I made E-7 in 7 1/2 years by building a reputation that I can get anything done that is given to me.
As the Army and DoD begins to become more aware of things like this expect a message to be published address this. Similar to Soldiers not being allowed to smoke in the office now unlike in the past.
If I find out one of my Soldiers/NCOs is ragging on another Soldier for something outside of the Soldiers control then I deal with the offender and not the defender. It's not tolerated in my office and my Soldiers know this.
(2)
(0)
Read This Next