1
1
0
Anyone know the difference (apart from the names) between these two forms?
Posted >1 y ago
Responses: 3
2
2
0
I dont think there is any true difference except for formatting...
On 22 April 2014 Army Publications Directorate published ATP 5-19, Risk
Management, dated April 2014. This doctrine replaced the now obsolete FM
5-19, Composite Risk Management, dated August 2006. ATP 5-19 established DD
Form 2977 as the standard risk management worksheet, replacing the now
rescinded DA Form 7566. On 23APR14 DoD Forms Branch released DD Form 2977,
dated 01JAN 2014, for general use.
(a) All units will replace all active DA Form 7566 risk management
worksheets predominately through normal review and replacement cycles with
an approved DD Form 2977 (Att 3) NLT 01MAY14.
That is the reasoning I found, and honestly, when I look for DA Form 7566, I can no longer find it on the armypubs website.
On 22 April 2014 Army Publications Directorate published ATP 5-19, Risk
Management, dated April 2014. This doctrine replaced the now obsolete FM
5-19, Composite Risk Management, dated August 2006. ATP 5-19 established DD
Form 2977 as the standard risk management worksheet, replacing the now
rescinded DA Form 7566. On 23APR14 DoD Forms Branch released DD Form 2977,
dated 01JAN 2014, for general use.
(a) All units will replace all active DA Form 7566 risk management
worksheets predominately through normal review and replacement cycles with
an approved DD Form 2977 (Att 3) NLT 01MAY14.
That is the reasoning I found, and honestly, when I look for DA Form 7566, I can no longer find it on the armypubs website.
(2)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Roger, I received the same thing. I was just double checking. Thank you for the clarification.
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
Ok, also, I heard from my S6 that the army is losing the lotus software contract; bringing all .xdfl over to fill-able .pdf. I haven't seen that in black and white personally, but I do trust him...
(0)
(0)
MAJ (Join to see)
So is there no longer a stated policy of O-5's being able to approve medium risk? The new ATP 5-19 seems to me to state that, Commander's now designate the level of risk they're willing to tolerate, if they choose to address it in their Commander's Guidance at all...
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
Yes, one is a Department of the Army form and only applies to the Army the other is a Department of Defense form and applies to all DOD activities.
(0)
(0)
0
0
0
The DA for is for the Department of the Army, and the DD is for the department of defense.
(0)
(0)
CPT (Join to see)
Roger, I meant like content wise. I looked at both and I didn't see any major difference. I was wondering because my unit was told to utilize DRA instead of CRM. Didn't know if this was a wide army change or something locally
(0)
(0)
SGM (Join to see)
Content wise nothing significant. That is a local thing not an Army wide change. If your Unit or mission includes Joint assets or OGA then the DD form would apply to all.
(1)
(0)
Read This Next
Continue with Facebook 
Continue with Google